Using research to inform learning technology practice and policy: A qualitative analysis of student perspectives

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Russell, Carol ^a   Malfroy, Janne ^b   Gosper, Maree ^c   McKenzie, Jo ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897391043     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.629     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ackroyd, S. (2009). Research designs for realist research. In Buchanan (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Resarch Methods (pp. 532-548; 531). London: Sage.
2. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology new vistas for qualitative research. London: SAGE.
3. Creswell, J. W. (2009) Research Design: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology (Research Report). Louisville: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
6. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. (2009) Students and Information Technology in Higher Education: 2010 Survey Questionnaire (Survey Instrument). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar.
7. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. (2010) Students and Information Technology in Higher Education: 2010 Survey Questionnaire (Survey Instrument). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar.
8. Ed Tech Now. (2012). MOOCS and other ed-tech bubbles. Retrieved from http://edtechnow.net/2012/12/29/moocs-and-other-ed-tech-bubbles
9. Ernst & Young. (2011). Higher education and the power of choice: Reform, competition and the emerging consumer-driven market in Australian higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Higher_education_and_the_power_of_choice_Australia/ $File/Higher%20education%20and%20the%20power%20of%20choice%20Australia.pdf
10. Ernst & Young. (2012). University of the future: A thousand year old industry on the cusp of profound change. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Higher_education_and_the_power_of_choice_Australia/ $File/Higher%20education%20and%20the%20power%20of%20choice%20Australia.pdf
11. Forsyth, H., Pizzica, J., Laxton, R., & Mahony, M. J. (2010). Distance education in an era of eLearning: challenges and opportunities for a campus-focused institution. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 15-28.
12. Franzosi, R. (2004). Content analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, pp. 187-191, Sage.
13. Gosper, M., Malfroy, J., & McKenzie, J. (2013). Students' experiences and expectations of technologies: An Australian study designed to inform planning and development decisions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 268-282.
14. Hanson, J. (2009). Displaced but not replaced: The impact of e-learning on academic identities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 553-64.
15. Ipsos MORI. (2008). Great expectations of ICT: How higher education institutions are measuring up. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Available from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/research/2008/greatexpectations.aspx
16. JISC. (2011). Student Experiences of Technology. Retrieved June 11, 2011 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/campaigns/studentexperiences.aspx
17. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
18. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Freeman, A. (2013). Technology outlook for Australian tertiary education 2013-2018: An NMC Horizon Project regional analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
19. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K. & Krause, K. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: are they really digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.
20. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective Use of Learning Technologies. London: Routledge Falmer.
21. Little, B. Locke, W, Scesa, A., & Williams, R. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. Centre for Higher Education Research and Information, The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2009/rd0309/rd03_09.pdf
22. Moss, G., Kubacki, K., Hersh, M., & Gunn, R. O. D. (2007). Knowledge management in higher education: A comparison of individualistic and collectivist cultures. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 377-394.
23. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.
24. Russell, C. (2009). A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: individual strategies in an institutional context. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 17(1), 3-19.
25. Sclater, N. (2008). Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems. ECAR Research Bulletin, 2008(13). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/web-20-personal-learning-environments-and-futurelearning-management-systems
26. Weller, M. (2007). The Ed Techie: "The VLE/LMS is dead" [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2007/11/the-vlelms-is-d.html
27. Weller, M. (2010). The centralisation dilemma in educational IT. International Journal of Virtual and Personal learning Environments, 1(1) 1-9, January-March.