Local spatial statistics for remotely sensed image classification of mangrove

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 37, Issue , 2008, Pages 719-723

  Liu, Zhi Gang ^a   Li, Jing ^a   Lim, Boon Leong ^b   Seng, Chung Yueh ^b   Inbaraj, Suppiah ^b   Sun, Zhichao ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Cilix Corporation   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Classification; Local Spatial Statistics; Mangrove; Remotely Sensed Image; Texture

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ENTROPY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; REMOTE SENSING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TEXTURES;

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; HIGH RESOLUTION REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; MANGROVE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFIERS; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; SPATIAL STATISTICS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84897370953     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Anguita, D., Boni, A., Ridella, S., 2000. Evaluating the generalization ability of support vector machines through the bootstrap. Neural Process, 11, pp. 51-58.
2. Anselin, L., 1995. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), pp. 93-115.
3. Anys, H., Bannari A., He, D.C., and Morin, D., 1994. Texture analysis for the mapping of urban areas using airborne MEIS-II images. Proceedings of the First International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, Strasbourg, France, 3, pp. 231-245.
4. Baraldi, A., Parmiggiani, F., 1995. An investigation of the textural Characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters. IEEE Trans. On Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(2), pp. 293-304.
5. Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Dcnkcr, J., Druckcr, H., Guyon, I., Jackcl, L., Cun, Y., Muller, U., Sackingcr, E., Simard, P., and Vapnik, V., 1994. Comparison of classifier methods: A case study in handwriting digit recognition. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Press, 77-87.
6. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V., 1995. Support Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, pp. 273-297.
7. Gao, J., 1999. A comparative study on spatial and spectral resolutions of satellite data in mapping mangrove forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(14), pp. 2823-2833.
8. Gao, J., 1998. A hybrid method toward accurate mapping of mangroves in a marginal habitat from SPOT multispectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(10), pp. 1887-1899.
9. Getis, A., Ord, J. K., 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), pp. 189-206.
10. Green, E.P., Clark, C.D., and Mumby, P. J., Edwards, A. J., Ellis, A.C., 1998. Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(5), pp. 935-956.
11. Siddiqui, Y., 2003. The modified IHS method for fusing satellite imagery. ASPRS Annual Conference Proceedings, Anchorage, Alaska.
12. Vapnik, V.N., 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. New York, Wiley.
13. Wang, L., Wayne, P.S., Gong, P., Gregory, S.B., 2004. Comparison of Ikonos and Quickbird Images for Mapping Mangrove Species on the Caribbean Coast of Panama. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91, pp. 432-440.
14. Zhang, Q.M., Sui, S.Z., 2001. The mangrove wetland resources and their conservation in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(1), pp. 28-36.
15. Zhang, X.L., Li, P.Y., Xu, X.Y., 2005. Present conditions and prospects of study on coastal wetlands in China. Advances in Marine Science, 23(1), pp. 87-95.