Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Tan, Kelvin H ^a   Sabapathy, Antoinette ^b   Wei, Xing ^a  

^a KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANXIETY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTRACTION STRESS; COST CONTROL; FETAL MANIPULATION; FETAL WELL BEING; FETUS DISTRESS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LOW RISK POPULATION; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MATERNAL ANXIETY; META ANALYSIS; MOCK STIMULATION; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ABDOMEN; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS MOVEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PALPATION; PREGNANCY;

ABDOMEN; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; FETAL MOVEMENT; HUMANS; PALPATION; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84897368239     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003396.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Druzin ML, Gratacos J, Paul RH, McCart D, Smith M. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. XII. The effect of manual manipulation of the fetus on the nonstress test. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985;151:61-4.
2. Newnham JP, Burns SE, Roberman BD. Effect of vibratory acoustic stimulation on the duration of fetal heart rate monitoring tests. American Journal of Perinatology 1990;7:232.
3. Piyamongkol W, Trungtawatchai S, Chanprapaph P, Tongsong T. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2006;89(12):1999-2002.
4. Trungtawatchai S, Chanpraparp P. Comparison of the nonstress test (NST) and NST with manual stimulation test (MST). Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999;11(4):273.
5. Visser GHA, Zeelenberg HJ, De Vries JIP, Dawes GS. External physical stimulation of the human fetus during episodes of low heart rate variation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1983;145:579-84.
6. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
7. Keegan KA Jr, Paul RH. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980;136(1):75-8.
8. Piyamongkol W, Trungtawatchai S, Chanprapaph P, Tongsong T. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2006;89(12):1999-2002.
9. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
10. Trungtawatchai S, Chanpraparp P. Comparison of the nonstress test (NST) and NST with manual stimulation test (MST). Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999;11(4):273.
11. Tan KH, Sabapathy A. Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. [DOI: ]