Being delicious: Materialities of research in a web 2.0 application

Beyond Postprocess

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 163-180

  Brooke, Collin ^a   Rickert, Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897286961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Bay, Jennifer, and Thomas Rickert. 2010. Dwelling with new media. In RAW: Reading and writing new media, edited by Cheryl Ball and Jim Kalmbach, 117-39. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
2. Bentley, Alex. 2008. Creative industries: Fashion versus reason. Cultural Science 1 (1http:// www.cultrual-science.org/journal/index.php/culturalscience/ article/view/4/12
3. Bollen, Johan, Herbert Van de Sompel, Aric Hagberg, Luis Bettencourt, Ryan Chute, Marko A. Rodriguez, and Lyudmila Balakireva. 2009. Clickstream data yields highresolution maps of science. PLoS ONE 4 (3). http://www.plosone.org/ article/ info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004803.
4. Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. 2003. The craft of research. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2004. Taylor's (anti-)epistemology. In Charles Taylor, edited by Ruth Abbey, 52-83. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dror, Itiel E., and Stevan Harnad, eds. 2009. Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
8. Evans, James A. 2008. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science 321 (5887): 395-99.
9. Fulkerson, Richard. 2001. Of pre- and post-process: Reviews and ruminations. Composition Studies 29 (2): 93-119.
10. Hayles, Katherine. 2007. Hyper and deep attention: The generational divide in cognitive modes. Profession 13 187-199.
11. Hansen, Mark. 2000. Embodying technesis: Technology beyond writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12. Ingold, Timothy. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling, and skill. New York: Routledge.
13. Johnson, Steven. 2005. Everything bad is good for you: How today's popular culture is actually making us smarter. New York: Riverhead.
14. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2005. Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. http:// www.kff.org/entmedia/7251.efm.
15. Kent, Thomas. 1991. On the very idea of a discourse community. College Composition and Communication 42 (4): 425-45.
16. 1993. Language, philosophy, writing, and reading: A conversation with Donald Davidson JAC 13 (1): 1-20.
17. 1999. Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Morville, Peter. 2005. Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
20. Reid, Alex. 2008. The two virtuals: New media and composition. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
21. Shirky, Clay. 2003. The FCC, weblogs, and inequality. Clay Shirky's writings about the Internet. http://shirky.com/writings/fcc-inequality.html.
22. Tuhus-Dubrow, Rebecca. 2008. Group think. Boston Globe, November 23, 2008, http:// www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/11/23/group-think/.
23. Vitanza, Victor. 2000. From heuristic to aleatory procedures; or, towards "writing the accident." In Inventing a discipline: Rhetoric scholarship in honor of Richard E. Young, edited by
24. Maureen Daly Goggin, 185-206. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Weinberger, David. 2007. Everything is miscellaneous: The power of the new digital disorder. New York: Times Books.