What is an utterance?

Dialogicality in Focus: Challenges to Theory, Method and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 33-52

  Haye, Andrés ^a   Larraín, Antonia ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD ALBERTO HURTADO   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897224612     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1929/1984). Problems of Dostoyevsky's poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1986a). The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences: An experiment in philosophical analysis. Speech genres and others late essays (pp. 132-158) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1986b). Toward a methodology for the human sciences. Speech genres and others late essays (pp. 159-172) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
5. Bakhtin, M. (1986c). The problem of speech genres. Speech genres and others late essays (pp. 60-102) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
6. Bakhtin, M. (1986d). Response to question from the Novy Mir editorial. Speech genres and others late essays (pp. 1-9) (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
7. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Billig, M. (2006). The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization. Discourse & Society, 19, 783-800.
9. Billig, M. (2011). Dialogical writing and dialogical theory: Reflections on Locke, Shaftesbury and fictional things. In M. Märtsin, B. Wagoner, E. L. Aveling, I. Kadianaki, & L. Whittaker (Eds.), Dialogicality in focus: Challenges to theory, method and application (pp. 3-18). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
10. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Lagenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32-51). Blackwell: Oxford.
11. Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2010). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19-46.
12. Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2009). Studying the movement of thought. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 69-88). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.
13. Goffman, E. (1975). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
14. Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis in psychology: A dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science 44, 1-22.
15. Haye, A., & Larraín, A. (2009). The notion of discourse: Beyond thought and language. In T. Teo, P. Stenner, A. Rutherford, E. Park, & C. Baerveldt (Eds.), Varieties of theoretical psychology. Internationa,l philosophical and practical Concerns. Concord, ON: Captus University Publication.
16. Heraclitus. (1987). Heraclitus: Fragments (T.M. Robinson Ed., Trans.). Toronto: Toronto University Press. (Original work 500 b.c).
17. Hermans, H. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243-281.
18. Josephs, I. E., Valsiner, J., & Surgan, S. E. (1999). The process of meaning construction: Dissecting the flow of semiotic activity. In J. Brandstädter & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Action & self-development: Theory and research through the life span.
19. Larraín, A., & Haye, A. (in press). The discursive nature of inner speech. Theory & Psychology.
20. Larraín, A., & Medina, L. (2007). Análisis de enunciación: Distinciones operativas para un análisis dialógico del discurso [Utterance analysis: Operative distinctions for a dialogical discourse analysis]. Estudios de Psicología, 28, 283-301.
21. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument of knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
22. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
23. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.
25. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Marková, I. (2006). On the inner alter. Journal for Dialogical Science, 1, 125-148.
27. Marková, I., & Foppa, K. (1990). The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
28. Marková, I., Linell, P., Grossen, M., & Salazar-Orvig, A. (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.
29. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007) Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
30. Mininni, G. (2010). The method of dialogue: Transaction through interaction. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science 44, 23-29.
31. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
32. Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluations. European Review of Social Psychology 9, 233-66.
33. Rommetveit, R. (1992). Outlines of dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind (pp.19-43). Stockholm: Scandinavian University Press.
34. Salgado, J. (2006). Thought as dialogue: A comment on Marková. Journal for Dialogical Science, 1, 149-154.
35. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout-Yagodzinski, S., & Clegg, J (Eds). (2009). YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science. Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Group.
36. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Shotter, J. (1993). Vygotsky: The social negotiation of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 11, 61-75.
38. Shotter, J. (2006). Vygotsky and consciousness as con-scientia, as witnessable knowing along with others. Theory & Psychology, 16, 13-36.
39. Tannen, D. (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12, 251-265.
41. Valsiner, J. (2005). Transformations and flexible forms: Where qualitative psychology begins. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 39-57.
42. Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: A requiem to the post modernist experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological & Behavioural Science, 43, 1-21.
43. Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Historically structured sampling (HSS): How can psychology's methodology become tuned into the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, C. Kölbl, D. Weidemann, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning: Theoretical and methodological advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 215-251). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
44. van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. van Dijk (Ed) Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
45. Voloshinov, V. N. (1926/1976). Discourse in life and discourse in art. Freudanism. A Marxist critique (I.N. Titunik & N.H. Bruss, Trans.). New York: Acadamic Press.
46. Voloshinov, V. N. (1929/1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka, I. I. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1999). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber, A. S. Carton, (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, V. 1. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
48. Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P., Lyra & N. Chaudhary (Eds). Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 99-121). New York: Springer.
49. Wagoner, B., & Valsiner, J. (2005). Rating tasks in psychology: From a static ontology to a dialogical synthesis of meaning. In A. Gülerçe, I. Steauble, A. Hofmeister, G. Saunders & J. Kaye (Eds), Contemporary theorizing in psychology: Global perspectives (pp. 197-213). Toronto: Captus Press.
50. Wagoner, B., Gillespie, A., Valsiner, J., Zittoun, T., Salgado, J., & Simão, L. (2011). Reparing ruptures: Multivocality of analysis. In M. Märtsin, B. Wagoner, E. L. Aveling, I. Kadianaki, & L. Whittaker (Eds.), Dialogicality in focus: Challenges to theory, method and application (pp. 105-128). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
51. Wertsch, I. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1997). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.