Station-level forecasting of bikesharing ridership

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2387, 2013, Pages 46-55

  Rixey, R ^a  

^a Fehr and Peers   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POPULATION STATISTICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BUILT ENVIRONMENT; DATA CONSISTENCY; DATA QUALITY; ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISTIC; NETWORK EFFECTS; POPULATION DENSITIES; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; REGRESSION MODELLING; ROBUST REGRESSIONS; STATION NETWORK;

FORECASTING;

EID: 84897134086     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2387-06     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Shaheen, S. A., S. Guzman, and H. Zhang. Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2010, pp. 159-167.
2. Shaheen, S. A., E. W. Martin, A. P. Cohen, and R. S. Finson. Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding. MTI report 11-26. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, Calif., 2012.
3. Krykewycz, G. R., C. M. Puchalsky, J. Rocks, B. Bonnette, and F. Jaskiewicz. Defining a Primary Market Area and Estimating Demand for a Major Bicycle-Sharing Program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2010, pp. 117-124.
4. Gregerson, J., M. Hepp-Buchanan, D. Rowe, J. Vander Sluis, E. Wygonik, M. Xenakis, and E. McCormack. Seattle Bicycle Share Feasibility Study. University of Washington, College of Built Environment Department of Urban Design and Planning, Seattle, 2011.
5. Olson, J., P. Goff, and S. Simms. City of Providence Bike Share Feasibility Study. Final report. Prepared by Alta Planning + Design for City of Providence, R. I., 2011.
6. Maurer, L. K. Feasibility Study for a Bicycle Sharing Program in Sacramento, California. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2012.
7. Buck, D., and R. Buehler. Bike Lanes and Other Determinants of Capital Bikeshare Trips. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2012.
8. Daddio, D. W. Maximizing Bicycle Sharing: An Empirical Analysis of Capital Bikeshare Usage. Master's project. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2012.
9. Hampshire, R. C., and L. Marla. An Analysis of Bike Sharing Usage: Explaining Trip Generation and Attraction from Observed Demand. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2012.
10. Osborne, J. Notes on the Use of Data Transformations. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2002. http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v=8&n=6. Accessed April 14, 2008.
11. Capital Bikeshare. Capital Bikeshare Launches Bank on DC Partnership Program. December 16, 2011. http://www.capitalbikeshare.com/news/2011/12/16/1140