Outcome of patients with esophageal perforations: A multicenter study

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 902-909

  Biancari, Fausto ^a   Saarnio, Juha ^a   Mennander, Ari ^b   Hypén, Linda ^a   Salminen, Paulina ^c   Kuttila, Kari ^c   Victorzon, Mikael ^d   Böckelman, Camilla ^d   Tarantino, Enrico ^e   Tiffet, Olivier ^e   Koivukangas, Vesa ^a   Søreide, Jon Arne ^f,g   Viste, Asgaut ^h   Bonavina, Luigi ⁱ   Vidarsdóttir, Halla ^j   Gudbjartsson, Tomas ^j  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d Vaasa City Hospital   (Finland)

^e HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^f STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^h HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^j LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Iceland)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; ESOPHAGUS; ESOPHAGUS PERFORATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897114344     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2312-2     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Barrett NR (1947) Report of a case of spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus successfully treated by operation. Br J Surg 35:216-218
2. Biancari F, D'Andrea V, Paone R et al (2013) Current treatment and outcomes of esophageal perforations in adults: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 75 studies. World J Surg 37:1051-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1951-7
3. Søreide JA, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19:66
4. Koivukangas V, Biancari F, Meriläinen S et al (2012) Esophageal stenting for spontaneous esophageal perforation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1011-1013
5. van Boeckel PG, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP et al (2011) Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:1292-1301
6. Biancari F (2012) On the need of standards for reporting on esophageal perforation. G Chir 33:254-258
7. Udelnow A, Huber-Lang M, Juchems M et al (2009) How to treat esophageal perforations when determinants and predictors of mortality are considered. World J Surg 33:787-796. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9857-5
8. Vidarsdottir H, Blondal S, Alfredsson H et al (2010) Oesophageal perforations in Iceland: a whole population study on incidence, aetiology and surgical outcome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58:476-480
9. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD et al (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016-1021