Rehabilitation of discourse impairments after acquired brain injury;Reabilitação de dificuldades comunicativas discursivas pós-lesão cerebral adquirida

Dementia e Neuropsychologia

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 58-65

  Gindri, Gigiane ^a   Pagliarin, Karina Carlesso ^a   Casarin, Fabíola Schwengber ^a   Branco, Laura Damiani ^a   Ferré, Perrine ^b   Joanette, Yves ^b   Fonseca, Rochele Paz ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain injuries; Communication; Language; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897095630     PISSN: 19805764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1980-57642014DN81000009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Brookshire RH. Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders. ERIC; 1997.
2. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Physic Med Rehab 1995;76:27-32.
3. Murray L, Coppens P. Formal and informal assessment of aphasia. In: Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Potagas C, editors. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
4. Mourik M van, Verschaeve M, Boon P, Paquier P, Harskamp F van. Cognition in global aphasia: Indicators for therapy. Aphasiology 1992;6: 491-499.
5. Zaidel E, Kasher A, Soroker N, Batori G. Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the "Right Hemisphere Communication Battery". Brain lang 2002;80:510-535.
6. Herrmann M, Koch U, Johannsen-Horbach H, Wallesch CW. Communicative skills in chronic and severe nonfuent aphasia. Brain Lang 1989; 37:339-352.
7. Ortiz KZ, Ferreira C P, Bento ACP. Aplicação do teste Beta 86 (protocolo Mt modifcado) em analfabetos. Fono atual 2006;8:65-73.
8. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17:35-43.
9. Rousseaux M, Daveluy W, Kozlowski O. Communication in conversation in stroke patients. J Neurol 2010;257:1099-1107.
10. Blake ML. Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: effects of contextual bias. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009;52: 373-384.
11. Cote H, Payer M, Giroux F, Joanette Y. Towards a description of clinical communication impairment profles following right-hemisphere damage. Aphasiology 2007;21:739-749.
12. Myers PS. Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. Singular Pub.; 1999.
13. Harley TA. The psychology of language: From data to theory. Taylor & Francis; 2001.
14. Brandão L. Discurso e cognição em suas variantes da demência fron-totemporal e na doença de Alzheimer. Rev Neuropsicol Latinoam 2010; 2:11-24.
15. Robertson DA, Gernsbacher MA, Guidotti SJ, et al. Functional neuro-anatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychol Sci 2000;11:255-260.
16. Van Djik TA. Context and language. Discourse and context: a socio-cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
17. Tompkins CA, Scharp VL, Fassbinder W, Meigh KM, Armstrong EM. A different story on "theory of mind" defcit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology 2008;22:42-61.
18. Lehman Blake M. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2006; 15:255-267.
19. Barnes S, Armstrong E. Conversation after right hemisphere brain damage: motivations for applying conversation analysis. Clin Ling Phon 2010;24:55-69.
20. Jorgensen M, Togher L. Narrative after traumatic brain injury: a com-parison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Inj 2009;23: 727-740.
21. Hird K, Kirsner K. The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: an analysis of intentional structure. Clin Ling Phon 2003;17:309-315.
22. Angeleri R, Bosco FM, Zettin M, Sacco K, Colle L, Bara BG. Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment. Brain Lang 2008:229-245.
23. Ferré P, Ska B, Lajoie C, Bleau A, Joanette Y. Clinical Focus on Prosod-ic, Discursive and Pragmatic Treatment for Right Hemisphere Damaged Adults: What's Right? Rehab Res Prac 2011;2011:1318-1320.
24. Bryan K. The right hemisphere language battery. Far Communications England; 1989.
25. Joanette Y, Ska B, Cote H. Protocole {MEC}, Protocole Montréal d'évaluation de la communication. Ortho Éd.; 2004.
26. Pimental PA, Kingsbury NA. Mini Inventory of Right Brain Injury. Texas: Pro-Ed.; 1989.
27. Ross-Swain D. Ross information processing assessment. Pro-Ed.; 1986.
28. Ribeiro A F. A utilização de inferências visuais na elaboração do discurso oral de indivíduos normais e indivíduos com lesão de hemisfério direito (Tese). Universidade de São Paulo; 2011.
29. Whitworth A. Using narrative as a bridge: linking language processing models with real-life communication. Semin Speech Lang 2010;31: 64-75.
30. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. WB SAUNDERS CO; 2000;81: 1596-1615.
31. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1681-1692.
32. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;91:519-530.
33. Tompkins CA. Rehabilitation for cognitive-communication disorders in right hemisphere brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93: 61-69.
34. Rispoli MJ, Machalicek W, Lang R. Communication interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury. Dev Neurorehabil 2010;13:141-151.
35. Ardila A. A proposed reinterpretation and reclassifcation of aphasic syndromes. Aphasiology 2010;24:363-394.
36. Maher LM, Raymer AM. Management of anomia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:10-21.
37. Foerch C, Misselwitz B, Sitzer M, Berger K, Steinmetz H, Neumann-Haefelin T. Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric stroke. Lancet 2005;366:392-393.
38. Morris J. Effects of right hemisphere strokes on personality functioning. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:425-430.
39. Sim P, Power E, Togher L. Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis. Brain Inj 2013;27:717-742.
40. Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, et al. Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial. J Rehabil Med 2013;45: 637-645.
41. Stuss D T, Winocur G, Robertson IH. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: Evidence and Application. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
42. Cherney LR, Halper AS. Novel technology for treating individuals with aphasia and concomitant cognitive defcits. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008: 542-554.
43. Cherney LR, Halper AS, Holland AL, Cole R. Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2008; 17:19-34.
44. Manheim LM, Halper AS, Cherney L. Patient-reported changes in communication after computer-based script training for aphasia. Arch Physic Med Rehabil 2009;90:623-627.
45. Simmons-mackie N, Elman RJ, Holland AL, Damico JS. Management of Discourse in Group Therapy for Aphasia. Top Lang Disord 2007; 70420:5-23.
46. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, González JL, Varela De Seijas E. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995-3000.
47. Rabelo DF, Neri AL. Recursos psicológicos e ajustamento pessoal frente à incapacidade funcional na velhice. Psicol Est 2005;10:403-412.
48. Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, Rossi B, Stemmer B, Van Heugten CM. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:665-680.
49. Rodriguez AD, Rothi LJG. Principles in conducting rehabilitation research. In: Stuss DT, Winocur G, Robertson IH, editors. Cognitive Neurorehabilitation: evidence and application. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008:79-90.
50. Wilson B. Evidence for the effectiveness of neuropsychological rehabilitation. In: Wilson B, Gracey F, Evans JJ, Bateman A, editors. Neuro-psychological rehabilitation: theory, models, therapy and outcome. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:22-36.
51. Mackenzie C, Brady M. Communication diffculties following right hemisphere stroke: applying evidence to clinical management. Evid Based Commun Asses Interv 2008;2:235-247.
52. De Noreña D, Ríos-Lago M, Bombín-González I, Sánchez-Cubillo I, García-Molina A, Tirapu-Ustárroz J. Efectividad de la rehabilitación neuropsicológica en el daño cerebral adquirido (I): atención, velocidad de procesamiento, memoria y lenguaje. Rev Neurol 2010;51:687-698.