Combination of flow reversal and distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 651-658

  Harada, Kei ^a   Kakumoto, Kousuke ^a   Morioka, Jun ^b   Saito, Tarou ^a   Fukuyama, Kouzou ^a  

^a FUKUOKA WAJIRO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Fukuoka Shin Mizumaki Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN PROTECTION; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEVICE SAFETY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISTAL FILTER; EMBOLIC PROTECTION FILTER; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; FEMALE; FEMORAL HEMATOMA; FLOW REVERSAL FILTER; GUIDING CATHETER; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OCCLUSION BALLOON CATHETER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VENOUS CIRCULATION; VERY ELDERLY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BALLOON OCCLUSION; BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID STENOSIS; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; BALLOON OCCLUSION; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CAROTID ARTERY, COMMON; CAROTID ARTERY, EXTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL EMBOLISM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84897092873     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: 16155947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.032     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gurm HS, Nallamothu BK, Yadav J. Safety of carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid artery disease: a metaanalysis. Eur Heart J 2008;29:113-9.
2. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:712-24. (Pubitemid 47598199)
3. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, et al. Wall aspiration assessment performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177-85. (Pubitemid 351628570)
4. Harada K, Morioka J, Higa T, et al. Significance of combining distal filter protection and a guiding catheter with temporary balloon occlusion for carotid artery stenting: clinical results and evaluation of debris capture. Ann Vasc Surg 2012;26:929-36.
5. Eskandari MK, Najjar SF, Matsumura JS, et al. Technical limitations of carotid filter embolic protection devices. Ann Vasc Surg 2007;21:403-7. (Pubitemid 47030840)
6. El-Koussy M, Schroth G, Do DD, et al. Periprocedural embolic events related to carotid artery stenting detected by diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison between proximal and distal embolus protection devices. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:293-303. (Pubitemid 47057911)
7. Montorsi P, Caputi L, Galli S, et al. Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1656-63.
8. Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Hazizi F, et al. The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1383-9.
9. Cosottini M, Michelassi MC, Puglioli M, et al. Silent cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients treated with protected and unprotected carotid artery stenting. Stroke 2005;36:2389-93. (Pubitemid 41566964)
10. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Martinez AE, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and cerebral embolization after carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:1188-94.
11. Ansel GM, Hopkins LN, Jaff MR, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;76:1-8.
12. Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Liso A, et al. Endovascular treatment of soft carotid plaques: a single-center carotid stent experience. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:190-5. (Pubitemid 44811727)
13. Coppi G, Moratto R, Silingardi R, et al. PRIAMUSeproximal flow blockage cerebral protectIon during carotid stenting: results from a multicenter Italian registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005;46:219-27. (Pubitemid 43932983)
14. Clair DG, Hopkins LN, Mehta M, et al. Neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting using the GORE flow reversal system: 30-day outcomes in the EMPiRE Clinical Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:420-9.
15. Schmidt A, Diederich KW, Scheinert S, et al. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44: 1966-9.
16. Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ, et al. Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation 2001;104:1999-2002.
17. Rubartelli P, Brusa G, Arrigo A, et al. Transcranial Doppler monitoring during stenting of the carotid bifurcation: evaluation of two different distal protection devices in preventing embolization. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:436-42.
18. Ribo M, Molina CA, Alvarez B, et al. Transcranial Doppler monitoring of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: a novel carotid revascularization technique. Stroke 2006;37:2846-9.
19. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Shimbo J, et al. Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurg 2010;67:1260-7.