Comparison of outlier detection algorithms for GOCE gravity gradients

International Association of Geodesy Symposia

Volumn 129, Issue , 2005, Pages 83-88

  Bouman, J ^a   Kern, M ^b   Koop, R ^a   Pail, R ^b   Haagmans, R ^c   Preimesberger, T ^d  

^a SRON NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^d Space Research Institute ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

GOCE mission; Gradiometry; Outliers; Statistical tests

Indexed keywords

ANOMALY DETECTION; DATA HANDLING; EARTH (PLANET); GRAVITATION; SIGNAL DETECTION; STATISTICAL TESTS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

GOCE MISSION; GRADIOMETRY; GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL; GRAVITY FIELD ANALYSIS; HIGH-RESOLUTION MODELS; INTERPOLATION OF GRADIENTS; OUTLIER DETECTION ALGORITHM; OUTLIERS;

STATISTICS;

EID: 84897075577     PISSN: 09399585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26932-0_15     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Arabelos D, Tscheming CC (1998) Calibration of satellite gradiometer data aided by ground gravity data. Journal of Geodesy. 72: 617-625
2. Bamett V, Lewis T (1994) Outliers in statistical data. 3rd edition, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York
3. Bouman J (2004) Quick-look outlier detection for GOCE gravity gradients. Paper presented at the lAG Porto meeting (GGSM 2004)
4. Bouman J, Koop R, Tscheming CC, Visser P (2004) Calibration of GOCE SGG data using high-low SST, terrestrial gravity data and global gravity field models. Journal of Geodesy, 78, DOI 10.1007/sOO 190-004-0382-5
5. Cesare S (2002) Performance requirements and budgets for the gradiometric mission. Issue 2 GO-TN-AI-0027, Preliminary Design Review, Alenia, Turin
6. ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. Reports for mission selection. The four candidate Earth explorer core missions. ESA SP-1233(1). European Space Agency, Noordwijk
7. Heiskanen W, Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
8. Kern M, Preimesberger T, Allesch M, Pail R, Bouman J, Koop R (2004) Outlier detection algorithms and their performance in GOCE gravity field processing. Accepted for publication in Journal of Geodesy
9. Lemoine F, Kenyon S, Factor J, Trimmer R, Pavlis N, Chinn D, Cox C, Klosko S, Luthcke S, Torrence M, Wang Y, Williamson R, Pavlis E, Rapp R, Olson T (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. TP 1998-206861, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt
10. Mayer C (2003) Wavelet modelling of ionospheric currents and induced magnetic fields from satellite data. PhD thesis. Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautem, Germany
11. Pail R, Preimesberger T (2003) GOCE quick-look gravity solution: application of the semianalytic approach in the case of data gaps and non-repeat orbits. Studia geophysica et geodaetica. 47:435-453
12. Rapp R, Wang Y, Pavlis N (1991) The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models. Rep 410, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus
13. Tscheming CC (1991) The use of optimal estimation for grosserror detection in databases of spatially correlated data. Bulletin dTnformation, no. 68, 79-89, BGI
14. Vauterin P, van Camp M (2004) TSoft Manual. Version 2.0.14, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Bruxelles, Belgium. Available at http://www.astro.oma.be/SEISMO/TSOFT/tsoft.html