Assessment of initial emission allowance allocation methods in the Korean electricity market

Energy Economics

Volumn 43, Issue , 2014, Pages 244-255

  Ahn, Jaekyun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auction; Benchmark; Electricity; Emission trading; Initial allocation of permits; Mixed complementarity problem; Social welfare

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMMERCE; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY; EMISSION CONTROL; FUELS; INVESTMENTS;

AUCTION; EMISSION TRADING; INITIAL ALLOCATIONS; MIXED COM-PLEMENTARITY PROBLEMS; SOCIAL WELFARE;

POWER PLANTS;

BENCHMARKING; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; INVESTMENT; POLICY APPROACH;

KOREA;

EID: 84897068848     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Åhman M., Holmgren K. New entrant allocation in the Nordic energy sectors: incentives and option in the EU ETS. Clim. Pol. 2006, 6:423-440.
2. Åhman M., Burtraw D., Kruger J.A., Zetterberg L. The ten-year rule: allocation of emission allowances in the EU Emissions Trading System. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1718-1730.
3. Burtraw D., Palmer K., Bharvurkar R., Paul A. The effect of allowance allocation on the cost of carbon emissions trading. Resources for the Future Discussion Papers 2001, 1-3.
4. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 1960, 3:1-44.
5. Considine T.J., Mount T.D. The use of linear logit models for dynamic input demand systems. Review of Economics and Statistics 1984, 66:443.
6. Cramton P., Kerr S. Tradable carbon permit auctions: how and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy 2002, 30:333-345.
7. Ellerman A.D., Convery F.J., Perthuis C.D. Pricing Carbon: the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme 2010, Cambridge University Press.
8. European Parliament and Council Directive 2009/29/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme of the Community 2009.
9. Ferris M.C., Munson T.S. Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 2000, 24:165-188.
10. García-Alcalde A., Ventosa M., Rivier M., Ramos A., Relaño G. Fitting Electricity Market Models. A Conjectural Variations Approach. Proceedings 14th PSCC Conference 2002.
11. Hepburn C., Grubb M., Neuhoff K., Matthes F., Tse M. Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why?. Clim. Pol. 2006, 6:137-160.
12. Kim S.D., Ha J.W., Park J.B. Probabilistic impact analysis of the power generation of wind farms on peak electricity demand. Korean Appl. Econ. 2007, 9:39-59.
13. Korea Electric Power Corporation Statistics of Electric Power in Korea 2010, 79.
14. Lee S.Y., Lim D.S., Lee H.J. Study on NAP for greenhouse gas mitigation II. Korea Environment Institute Working Papers 2009, 9-10.
15. Linares P., Santos F.J., Ventosa M. Impacts of the European emission trading scheme directive and permits assignment methods on the Spanish electricity sector. Energy J. 2006, 27:47-66.
16. 2 emissions trading and green certificates into a power generation expansion model. Automatica 2008, 44:1608-1620.
17. Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea The 5th basic plan of long term electricity supply and demand. Public Release 2010/490 2010.
18. Neuhoff K., Martinez K.K., Sato M. Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emission allowance allocations to electricity sector. Clim. Pol. 2006, 6:73-91.
19. Reinaud J. Emission Trading and its Possible Impacts on Investment Decisions in the Power Sector 2003, IEA Information Paper, Paris.
20. Rogge K., Linden C. Comparison of Allocation Rules of EU Member States (2008-2012) for the Power Sector 2008, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe.
21. Rutherford T.F. Extensions of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 1995, 19:1-8.
22. 2 cost pass through and windfall profits in the power sector. Clim. Pol. 2006, 6:49-72.
23. 2 market's trial period: what does the CITL reveal?. Climate Report 13, Mission Climat Caisse des Depots 2008.
24. Ventosa M., Denis R., Redondo C. Expansion planning in electricity markets. Two different approaches. Proceedings 14th PSCC Conference Seville 2002, 1-8.
25. Wolfram C.D. Measuring duopoly power in the British electricity spot market. Am. Econ. Rev. 1999, 89:805-826.