Diagnostic accuracy of coronary ct angiography: Comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 179-184

  Wang, Rui ^a   Schoepf, U Joseph ^b   Wu, Runze ^c   Nance, John W ^d   Lv, Biao ^a   Yang, Hua ^e   Li, Fang ^a   Lu, Dongxu ^a   Zhang, Zhaoqi ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c SIEMENS LTD   (China)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HEBEI UNITED UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT); Coronary arteries; Image reconstruction; Radiation dose

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS; HEART; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; ITERATIVE METHODS;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST-TO-NOISE RATIO; CORONARY ARTERIES; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; SINOGRAMS; STRENGTH FACTOR;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION RESPONSE; RR INTERVAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SINOGRAM AFFIRMED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84897051712     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique - Comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2130-2138
2. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3141-3145
3. Renker M, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ, et al. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CTA angiography: Comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology. 2011;260:390-399
4. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: Assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:649-654
5. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:764-771
6. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: Effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:134-141
7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51(suppl 4):5-40
8. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:592-599
9. Schultz K, George E, Mullen KM, et al. Reduced radiation exposure for face transplant surgical planning computed tomography angiography. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063079
10. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:627-635
11. Wang R, Schoepf UJ, Wu R, et al. CT coronary angiography: Image quality with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:272-278
12. Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, et al. Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:1167-1175
13. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:202-210
14. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:126-131
15. Fuchs TA, Fiechter M, Gebhard C, et al. CT coronary angiography: Impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:719-724
16. Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2932-2937.