Membrane Perforation in Sinus Floor Elevation - Piezoelectric Device versus Conventional Rotary Instruments for Osteotomy: An Experimental Study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 867-873

  Seoane, Juan ^a   López Niño, Javier ^a   García Caballero, Lucía ^a   Seoane Romero, Juan Manuel ^a   Tomás, Inmaculada ^a   Varela Centelles, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bone augmentation; Dental implants; Maxillary sinus floor elevation; Membrane perforation; Piezoelectric surgery

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; OSTEOTOMY; SHEEP; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION;

ANIMALS; OSTEOTOMY; SHEEP; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION;

EID: 84897035110     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00447.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS, Chiapasco M, Darby I. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:272-278.
2. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:216-240.
3. Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernández-Barbero JE, etal. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:376-382.
4. Marchetti C, Pieri F, Trasarti S, Corinaldesi G, Degidi M. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:399-407.
5. Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25:261-265.
6. Escoda-Francolí J, Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Application of ultrasound in bone surgery: two case reports. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 16:e902-e905.
7. Karabuda C, Arisan V, Ózyuvaci H. Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in augmented sinus. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1991-1997.
8. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J, Roher MD. Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:413-420.
9. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004; 75:511-516.
10. Torrella F, Pitarch J, Cabanes G, Anitua E. Ultrasonic osteotomy for the surgical approach of the maxillary sinus: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:697-700.
11. Wallace SS, Mazor Z, Froum SJ, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Schneiderian membrane perforation rate during sinus elevation using piezosurgery: clinical results of 100 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27:413-419.
12. Blus C, Szmuckler-Moncler S, Salama M, Salama H, Garber D. Sinus bone grafting procedures using ultrasonic bone surgery: 5-year experience. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28:221-229.
13. Vercelotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21:561-567.
14. Barone A, Santini S, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Gherlone E, Covani U. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs conventional rotative instrumentations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:511-515.
15. Hoffman RR, Shadbolt NR, Burrton AM, Klein G. Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1995; 62:129-158.
16. Ioannou I, Kazmierczak E, Stern L, Smith AC, Wise LZ, Field B. Towards defining dental drilling competence, part 1: a study of bone drilling technique. J Dent Educ 2010; 74:931-940.
17. López-Niño J, García-Caballero L, González-Mosquera A, Seoane-Romero J, Varela-Centelles P, Seoane J. Lamb ex-vivo model for training in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery: a comparative study with human standards. J Periodontol 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
18. Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M. The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64:277-282.
19. Berengo M, Sivolella S, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Endoscopic evaluation of the bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:189-194.
20. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:1128-1132.
21. Maestre-Ferrín L, Carrillo-García C, Galán-Gil S, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa: panoramic radiograph versus computed tomography scan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69:507-511.
22. Yilmaz HG, Tözüm TF. Are gingival phenotype, residual ridge height and membrane thickness critical for the perforation of maxillary sinus? J Periodontol 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
23. Ioannou I, Stern L, Kazmierczak E, Smith AC, Wise LZ. Towards defining dental drilling competence, part 2: a study of cues and factors in bone drilling. J Dent Educ 2010; 74:941-950.
24. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, etal. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005; 330:88.
25. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol 2004; 75:1061-1067.
26. Cho-Lee GY, Naval Gias L, Castrejon-Castrejon S, etal. A 12-year retrospective analytic study of the implant survival rate in 177 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:1019-1027.