INSPM: An interactive evolutionary multi-objective algorithm with preference model

Information Sciences

Volumn 268, Issue , 2014, Pages 202-219

  Pedro, Luciana R ^a   Takahashi, Ricardo H C ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Evolutionary computation; Interactive algorithm; Multi objective optimization; Progressive preference; RBF network; Utility function model

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; QUERY PROCESSING; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

DYNAMIC CROWDING DISTANCES; EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-OBJECTIVE ALGORITHMS; INTERACTIVE ALGORITHMS; INTERACTIVE METHODS; NON-DOMINATED SORTING ALGORITHMS; PARETO-OPTIMAL FRONT; PROGRESSIVE PREFERENCE; UTILITY-FUNCTION MODEL;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84897033871     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.045     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA II IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6 2 2002 182 197
2. K. Deb, A. Sinha, P.J. Korhonen, and J. Wallenius An interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization method based on progressively approximated value functions Trans. Evol. Comput. 14 5 2010 723 739
3. K. Deb, J. Sundar, Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, in: GECCO, 2006, pp. 635-642.
4. C.M. Fonseca, and P.J. Fleming An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization Evol. Comput. 7 3 1995 205 230
5. The MathWorks Inc. Matlab - Version 6.9.0 (R2009b). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, 2009.
6. R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs 1976 J. Wiley New York
7. M.G. Kendall A new measure of rank correlation Biometrika 30 1/2 1938 81 93
8. J.D. Knowles, D.W. Corne, M-paes: a memetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization, in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2000, pp. 325-332.
9. D.E. Knuth The Art of Computer Programming second ed. Sorting and Searching vol. 3 1998 Addison-Wesley pp 158-168
10. M. Köksalan, and I. Karahan An interactive territory defining evolutionary algorithm: iTDEA Trans. Evol. Comput. 14 5 2010 702 722
11. B. Luo, J. Zheng, J. Xie, and J. Wu Dynamic crowding distance - a new diversity maintenance strategy for MOEAs Proceedings of the 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation - vol. 01, ICNC '08 2008 IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA 580 585
12. L.R. Pedro, R.H.C. Takahashi, Modeling decision-maker preferences through utility function level sets, in: 6th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, vol. 1, 2011.
13. L.R. Pedro, R.H.C. Takahashi, Decision-maker preference modeling in interactive multiobjective optimization, in: 7th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, vol. 7811, 2013.
14. E. Zitzler, K. Deb, and L. Thiele Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results Evol. Comput. 8 2000 173 195
15. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, SPEA 2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithms, in EUROGEN 2001, Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, 2002, pp. 95-100.