Impact of micropapillary histological variant on survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 531-537

  Masson Lecomte, Alexandra ^a   Colin, Pierre ^b   Bozzini, Gregory ^b   Nison, Laurent ^b   de La Taille, Alexandre ^a   Comperat, Eva ^c   Zerbib, Marc ^d   Rozet, François ^e   Cathelineau, Xavier ^e   Valeri, Antoine ^f   Ruffion, Alain ^g   Guy, Laurent ^h   Droupy, Stéphane ⁱ   Cussenot, Olivier ^j,k   Rouprêt, Morgan ^c,k  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^e INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

^f BREST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^h SERVICE DE RHUMATOLOGIE   (France)

ⁱ NÎMES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^j HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^k INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Renal pelvis; Surgery; Survival; Ureter; Urothelial carcinoma

Indexed keywords

AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KIDNEY PELVIS; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIPLE CANCER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA; URETER; URETER TUMOR; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; KIDNEY PELVIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; NEPHRECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; URETER; URETERAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84897033399     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1141-0     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Munoz JJ, Ellison LM (2000) Upper tract urothelial neoplasms: incidence and survival during the last 2 decades. J Urol 164: 1523-1525.
2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63: 11-30.
3. Jeldres C, Sun M, Isbarn H, Lughezzani G, Budaus L, Alasker A et al (2010) A population-based assessment of perioperative mortality after nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology 75: 315-320.
4. Drouin SJ, Yates DR, Hupertan V, Cussenot O, Roupret M (2013) A systematic review of the tools available for predicting survival and managing patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and of the upper tract in a curative setting. World J Urol 31: 109-116.
5. Roupret M, Hupertan V, Seisen T, Colin P, Xylinas E, Yates DR et al (2013) Prediction of cancer specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: development of an optimized postoperative nomogram using decision curve analysis. J Urol 189: 1662-1669.
6. Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester R, Burger M et al (2013) European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update. Eur Urol 63: 1059-1071.
7. Cha EK, Shariat SF, Kormaksson M, Novara G, Chromecki TF, Scherr DS et al (2012) Predicting clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol 61: 818-825.
8. Amin MB, Ro JY, El-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG et al (1994) Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 18: 1224-1232.
9. Oh YL, Kim KR (2000) Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the ureter. Pathol Int 50: 52-56.
10. Vang R, Abrams J (2000) A micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma arising in the ureter. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124: 1347-1348.
11. Holmang S, Thomsen J, Johansson SL (2006) Micropapillary carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. J Urol 175: 463-466; discussion 466-467.
12. Perez-Montiel D, Hes O, Michal M, Suster S (2006) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: clinicopathologic study of five cases. Am J Clin Pathol 126: 86-92.
13. Munakata S, Tahara H, Kojima K, Kishimoto T (2007) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: report of a case and review of the literature. Med Sci Monit 13: CS47-CS52.
14. Guo CC, Tamboli P, Czerniak B (2009) Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract: a clinicopathologic study of 11 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133: 62-66.
15. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E et al (2009) Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer 115: 1224-1233.
16. Ariane MM, Colin P, Ouzzane A, Pignot G, Audouin M, Cornu JN et al (2012) Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 301-308.
17. Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Kobayashi H, Miyazaki Y et al (2013) Patient characteristics and outcomes in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: the experience of Japanese multi-institutions. BJU Int 112: E28-E34.
18. Rink M, Robinson BD, Green DA, Cha EK, Hansen J, Comploj E et al (2012) Impact of histological variants on clinical outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 188: 398-404.
19. Hurel S, Roupret M, Ouzzane A, Rozet F, Xylinas E, Zerbib M et al (2013) Impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. BJU Int 111: 1199-1207.
20. Colin P, Ouzzane A, Yates DR, Francois A, Pignot G, Arvin-Berod A et al (2012) Influence of positive surgical margin status after radical nephroureterectomy on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma survival. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 3613-3620.
21. Wang JK, Boorjian SA, Cheville JC, Kim SP, Tarrell RF, Thapa P et al (2012) Outcomes following radical cystectomy for micropapillary bladder cancer versus pure urothelial carcinoma: a matched cohort analysis. World J Urol 30: 801-806.
22. Fairey AS, Daneshmand S, Wang L, Schuckman A, Lieskovsky G, Djaladat H et al (2013) Impact of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma variant histology on survival after radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. doi: 10. 1016/j. urolonc. 2012. 04. 020.
23. Xylinas E, Rink M, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Bensalah K, Shariat SF et al (2012) Histologic variants of upper tract urothelial carcinoma do not affect response to adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy. Eur Urol 62: e25-e26.
24. Sangoi AR, Beck AH, Amin MB, Cheng L, Epstein JI, Hansel DE et al (2010) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 34: 1367-1376.
25. Shah RB, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Kunju LP (2012) Variant (divergent) histologic differentiation in urothelial carcinoma is under-recognized in community practice: impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large referral hospital. Urol Oncol. doi: 10. 1016/j. urolonc. 2012. 04. 009.
26. Comperat E, Roupret M, Yaxley J, Reynolds J, Varinot J, Ouzaid I et al (2010) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological analysis of 72 cases. Pathology 42: 650-654.
27. Gaya JM, Palou J, Algaba F, Arce J, Rodriguez-Faba O, Villavicencio H (2010) The case for conservative management in the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma without carcinoma in situ. Can J Urol 17: 5370-5376.
28. Perez-Montiel D, Wakely PE, Hes O, Michal M, Suster S (2006) High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants. Mod Pathol 19: 494-503.