New approaches in project performance evaluation techniques

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 435-444

  Bower, Douglas C ^a,b   Finegan, Andrew D ^c  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Project evaluation; Project management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897029611     PISSN: 17538378     EISSN: 17538386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17538370910971072     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bower, D.C. (2004a), “Assured value analysis: earned value extended”, paper presented at the PMI Global Congress North America 2004, Anaheim, CA, October.
2. Bower, D.C. (2004b), “Assured value analysis: EVM meets procurement”, paper presented at the 16th Annual International Integrated Program Management Conference, Tysons Corner, VA, November 14-17.
3. Bower, D.C. (2005), “Phase earned value analysis”, paper presented at the PMI Global Congress North America, Toronto, September.
4. Bower, D.C. (2006a), “Phase earned value analysis: a proposal for simplifying yet enhancing EVM”, paper presented at the PMI Research Conference 2006, Montreal, July 16-19.
5. Bower, D.C. (2006b), “Phase earned value analysis: a proposal to simplify yet enhance EVM”, paper presented at the Business Performance and Project Management Summit, London, April 27.
6. Bower, D.C. (2007), “New directions in project performance and progress evaluation”, unpublished research, RMIT University, Melbourne.
7. Bower, D.C. and Walker, D.H.T. (2007), “Planning knowledge for phased rollout projects”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 45-60.
8. Cicmil, S. (2006), “Understanding project management practice through interpretive and critical research perspectives”, Project Management Journal, June, pp. 27-37.
9. Cicmil, S. and Hodgson, D. (2006a), Making Projects Critical, Palgrave, New York, NY.
10. Cicmil, S. and Hodgson, D. (2006b), “Making projects critical: an introduction”, in Cicmil, S. and Hodgson, D. (Eds), Making Projects Critical, Palgrave, New York, NY, pp. 1-28.
11. Evans, K.S. (2005), Improving Information Technology (IT) Project Planning and Execution, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, Memorandum.
12. Fleming, Q.W. and Koppelman, J.M. (2004), “If EVM is so good … Why isn't it used on all projects?”, The Measurable News, Spring.
13. Hillson, D. (2004), “Earned value management and risk management: a practical synergy”, paper presented at the PMI Global Congress North America, Anaheim, CA, October.
14. Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. (1995), The Active Interview, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
15. Morris, P.W.G. (1994), The Management of Projects: A New Model, Thomas Telford, London.
16. Morris, P.W.G. (2000), “Researching the unanswered questions of project management”, paper presented at the PMI Research Conference, London.
17. NDIA (1998), ANSI/EIA-748 Guide: Earned Value Management System (Standard), American National Standard Institute/Electronic Industry Association, Washington, DC.
18. PMI (2005), Practice Standard for Earned Value Management, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.
19. Williams, T. (2005), “Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 497-508.
20. Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P.W.G. and Cicmil, S. (2006), “Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government-funded research network”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, pp. 638-49.
21. Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.