Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 232, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1293-1307

  Federico, Paolo ^a   Mirabella, Giovanni ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c IRCCS NEUROMED   (Italy)

Author keywords

Countermanding task; Proactive control; Probability bias; Reaching movements; Volitional inhibition; Voluntary movements

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE INHIBITION; RESPONSE READINESS; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; YOUNG ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897021456     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3846-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Band GP, van der Molen MW, Logan GD (2003) Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol (Amst) 112:105-142
2. Boucher L, Palmieri TJ, Logan GD, Schall JD (2007) Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychol Rev 114:376-397
3. Bryden MP (1977) Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15:617-624
4. Cavina-Pratesi C, Bricolo E, Pellegrini B, Marzi CA (2004) At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic? Exp Brain Res 155:220-230
5. Chikazoe J, Jimura K, Hirose S, Yamashita K, Miyashita Y, Konishi S (2009) Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task. J Neurosci 29:15870-15877
6. Colonius H (1990) A note on the stop-signal paradigm, or how to observe the unobservable. Psychol Rev 97:309-312
7. Eickhoff SB, Pomjanski W, Jakobs O, Zilles K, Langner R (2011) Neural correlates of developing and adapting behavioral biases in speeded choice reactions: an FMRI study on predictive motor coding. Cereb Cortex 21:1178-1191
8. Jahfari S, Stinear CM, Claffey M, Verbruggen F, Aron AR (2010) Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms? J Cogn Neurosci 22:1479-1492
9. Jahfari S, Verbruggen F, Frank MJ, Waldorp LJ, Colzato L, Ridderinkhof KR, Forstmann BU (2012) How preparation changes the need for top-down control of the basal ganglia when inhibiting premature actions. J Neurosci 32:10870-10878
10. Laming DJR (1969) Subjective probability in choice-reaction experiments. J Math Psychol 6:80-121
11. Lansbergen MM, Schutter DJ, Kenemans JL (2007) Subject impulsivity and baseline EEG in relation to stopping performance. Brain Res 1148:161-169
12. Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467-477
13. Li CS, Krystal JH, Mathalon DH (2005) Fore-period effect and stopsignal reaction time. Exp Brain Res 167:305-309
14. Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 189-239
15. Logan GD, Burkell J (1986) Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: a comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:549-563
16. Logan GD, Cowan WB (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295-327
17. Lungu OV, Wächter T, Liu T, Willingham DT, Ashe J (2004) Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning. Exp Brain Res 159:135-150
18. Marzi CA, Bisiacchi P, Nicoletti R (1991) Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a metaanalysis. Neuropsychologia 29:1163-1177
19. Mattia M, Spadacenta S, Pavone L, Quarato P, Esposito V, Sparano A, Sebastiano F, Di Gennaro G, Morace R, Cantore G, Mirabella G (2012) Stop-event-related potentials from intracranial electrodes reveal a key role of premotor and motor cortices in stopping ongoing movements. Front Neuroeng 5:12
20. Miller J (1998) Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1521-1534
21. Mirabella G, Pani P, Parè M, Ferraina S (2006) Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 174:240-255
22. Mirabella G, Pani P, Ferraina S (2008) Context influence on the preparation and execution of reaching movements. Cog Neuropsychol 25:996-1010
23. Mirabella G, Pani P, Ferraina S (2009) The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process. Exp Brain Res 192:199-209
24. Mirabella G, Iaconelli S, Romanelli P, Modugno N, Lena F, Manfredi M, Cantore G (2012) Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nuclei affects arm response inhibition in Parkinson's patients. Cereb Cortex 22:1124-1132
25. Mirabella G, Iaconelli S, Modugno N, Giannini G, Lena F, Cantore G (2013) Stimulation of subthalamic nuclei restores a near normal planning strategy in Parkinson's patients. PLoS ONE 8:e62793
26. Montagnini A, Chelazzi L (2009) Dynamic interaction between "go" and "stop" signals in the saccadic eye movement system: new evidence against the functional independence of the underlying neural mechanisms. Vis Res 49:1316-1328
27. Osman A, Kornblum S, Meyer DE (1986) The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:243-258
28. Osman A, Kornblum S, Meyer DE (1990) Does motor programming necessitate response execution? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:183-198
29. Ramautar JR, Kok A, Ridderinkhof KR (2004) Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain Cogn 56:234-252
30. Stevenson SA, Elsley JK, Corneil BD (2009) A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task. J Neurophysiol 101:580-590
31. Swann NC, Cai W, Conner CR, Pieters TA, Claffey MP, George JS, Aron AR, Tandon N (2012) Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity. Neuroimage 59:2860-2870
32. van den Wildenberg WP, van der Molen MW, Logan GD (2002) Reduced response readiness delays stop signal inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 111:155-169
33. van den Wildenberg WP, van Boxtel GJ, van der Molen MW (2003) The duration of response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm varies with response force. Acta Psychol (Amst) 114:115-129
34. Velay JL, Benoit-Dubrocard S (1999) Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transfer in reaching programming. Neuropsychologia 37:895-903
35. Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2009) Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:835-854
36. Zandbelt BB, Vink M (2010) On the role of the striatum in response inhibition. PLoS ONE 5:e13848
37. Zandbelt BB, Bloemendaal M, Neggers SFW, Kahn RS, Vink M (2012) Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control. Hum Brain Mapp. doi:10.1002/hbm.22047