Submitting a manuscript for peer review-integrity, integrity, integrity

Journal of Neurochemistry

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 341-343

  Murphy, Sean P ^a   Bulman, Christopher ^a   Shariati, Behnam ^a   Hausmann, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; NEUROCHEMISTRY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RETRACTED ARTICLE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; EDITORIAL; STANDARD;

PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PLAGIARISM; PUBLISHING; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84897019250     PISSN: 00223042     EISSN: 14714159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12644     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barboza D., Bowley G., and, Cox A., (2013) Forging an Art Market in China, in New York Times, October 28.
2. Bohannon J., (2013) Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65.
3. Dirnagl U., and, Lauritzen M., (2010) Fighting publication bias: introducing the Negative Results section. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 30, 1263-1264.
4. Fanelli D., (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4, e5738.
5. Fanelli D., (2013) Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Med. 10, e1001563.
6. Fang F. C., Steen R. G., and, Casadevall A., (2012) Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17028-17033.
7. Grant R., (2011) Neurosurgery resident plagiarized research. Scientist, November 7.
8. Hvistendahl M., (2013) China's publication bazaar. Science 342, 1035-1039.
9. Redman B. K., and, Merz J. F., (2013) Effects of findings of scientific misconduct on post-doctoral trainees. AJOB Primary Res. 4, 64-67.
10. Sala S. D., Grafman J., and, Cubelli R., (2013) I copy, therefore I publish. Cortex 49, 2281-2282.
11. Steen R. G., Casadevall A., and, Fang F. C., (2013) Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoS ONE 8, e68397.
12. Wadman M., (2013) NIH mulls rules for validating key results. Nature 500, 14-16.
13. Wakefield A. J., Murch S. H., Anthony A., et al,. (1998) Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351, 637-641.
14. Yong E., Ledford H., and, Van Noorden R., (2013) Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle. Nature 503, 454-457.