Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: Results of a multicenter randomized trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 199-205

  Berry, Donna L ^a,b   Hong, Fangxin ^a   Halpenny, Barbara ^a   Partridge, Ann H ^a,b   Fann, Jesse R ^c,d   Wolpin, Seth ^e   Lober, William B ^e   Bush, Nigel E ^f   Parvathaneni, Upendra ^c   Back, Anthony L ^c,d   Amtmann, Dagmar ^c,d   Ford, Rosemary ^d  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEOPLASM; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84897018826     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.6662     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, et al: Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1029-1035, 2011
2. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE 2nd, Wheeler JL, et al: Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: Pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology. J Pain Symptom Manage 37:1027-1038, 2009
3. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al: Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714-724, 2004 (Pubitemid 41095076)
4. Ruland CM, Andersen T, Jeneson A, et al: Effects of an internet support system to assist cancer patients in reducing symptom distress: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs 36:6-17, 2013
5. Carlson LE, Groff SL, Maciejewski O, et al: Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:4884-4891, 2010
6. Mitchell PH, Ferketich S, Jennings BM: Quality health outcomes model: American Academy of Nursing expert panel on quality health care. Image J Nurs Sch 30:43-46, 1998
7. Berry DL, Hong F, Halpenny B, et al: The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: Understanding the results of a randomized trial. Presented at the Oncology Nursing Society Connections Conference, Phoenix, AZ, November 16-18, 2012 (abstr E577)
8. McCorkle R, Cooley M, Shea J: A user's manual for the Symptom Distress Scale. http://fhsson.mcmaster.ca/apn/images/stories/pdfs/Symptom-Distress-Scale- user-manual.pdf
9. Hong F, Bosco JL, Bush N, et al: Patient self-appraisal of change and minimal clinically important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 before and during cancer therapy. BMC Cancer 13:165, 2013
10. Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, et al: Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA 304:163-171, 2010
11. Allen JD, Berry DL: Multi-media support for informed/shared decision-making before and after a cancer diagnosis. Semin Oncol Nurs 27:192-202, 2011
12. Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M, et al: The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF). Cancer 89:1162-1171, 2000
13. Eggly S, Harper FW, Penner LA, et al: Variation in question asking during cancer clinical interactions: A potential source of disparities in access to information. Patient Educ Couns 82:63-68, 2011
14. Krueger JL, Hermansen-Kobulnicky CJ: Patient perspective of medication information desired and barriers to asking pharmacists questions. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 51:510-519, 2011
15. Cáceres I, Orejuela-Hood M, West J: Racial and ethnic health disparities by EOHHS regions in Massachusetts. http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/ dph/research-epi/disparity-report.pdf
16. American College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer: Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/ programstandards2012.pdf
17. Fann JR, Ell K, Sharpe M: Integrating psychosocial care into cancer services. J Clin Oncol 30:1178-1186, 2012