Optimized extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from pristine and carded hemp fibres

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 56, Issue , 2014, Pages 175-186

  Luzi, F ^a   Fortunati, E ^a   Puglia, D ^a   Lavorgna, M ^c   Santulli, C ^b   Kenny, J M ^a,d   Torre, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMERINO   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE POLÍMEROS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanocrystals; Chemical procedures; Enzymatic treatment; Hemp fibres; Natural fibres

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; EXTRACTION; HEMP; HEMP FIBERS; HYDROLYSIS; NATURAL FIBERS; OPTIMIZATION; REMOVAL; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CELLULOSE CRYSTALLITES; CELLULOSE NANO-CRYSTALS; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTAL (CNC); CHEMICAL PROCEDURES; CHEMICAL TREATMENTS; ENZYMATIC TREATMENTS; HYDROLYSIS METHODS; PRETREATMENT METHODS;

FIBERS;

CELLULOSE; DECOMPOSITION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

ALGORITHMS; ALKALINITY; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; EXTRACTION; HEMP; HYDROLYSIS; NATURAL FIBERS; OPTIMIZATION; TEXTILES; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84897003542     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrahama E., Deepaa B., Pothana L.A., Jacobc M., Thomasb S., Cvelbard U., Anandjiwalac R. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohyd. Polym. 2011, 86:1468-1475.
2. Akin D.E., Foulk J.A., Dodd R.B., McAlister D.D. Enzyme-retting of flax and characterization of processed fibers. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 89:193-203.
3. Alemdar A., Sain M. Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibres: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68:557-565.
4. Besbes I., Vilar M.R., Boufi S. Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohyd. Polym. 2011, 84:975-983.
5. Chen H., Ferrari C., Angiuli M., Yao J., Raspi C., Bramanti E. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of wood samples by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82:772-778.
6. Collet F., Achchaq F., Djellab K., Marmoret L., Beji H. Water vapor properties of two hemp wools manufactured with different treatments. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25:1079-1085.
7. Corgié S.C., Smith H.M., Walker L.P. Enzymatic transformations of cellulose assessed by quantitative high-throughput Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (QHT-FTIR). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011, 108:1509-1520.
8. Croxford J.L., Pryce G., Jackson S.J., Ledent C., Giovannoni G., Pertwee R.G., Yamamura T., Baker D. Cannabinoid-mediated neuroprotection, not immunosuppression, may be more relevant in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008, 193:120-129.
9. Dai D., Fan M., Collins P. Fabrication of nanocelluloses from hemp fibers and their application for the reinforcement of hemp fibers. Ind. Crop Prod. 2013, 44:192-199.
10. Fisher T., Hajaligol M., Waymack B., Kellogg D. Pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of biomass derived materials. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2002, 62:331-349.
11. Fortunati E., Puglia D., Monti M., Peponi L., Santulli C., Kenny J.M., Torre L. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from Phormium tenax fibres. J. Polym. Environ. 2012, 21:319-328.
12. Fortunati E., Armentano I., Zhou Q., Iannoni A., Saino E., Visai L., Berglund L.A., Kenny J.M. Multifunctional bionanocomposite films of poly(lactic acid), cellulose nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012, 87:1596-1605.
13. Fortunati E., Puglia D., Monti M., Santulli C., Maniruzzaman M., Kenny J.M. Cellulose nanocrystals extracted from okra fibres in PVA nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 128:3220-3230.
14. Fortunati E., Puglia D., Monti M., Peponi L., Santulli C., Kenny J.M., Torre L. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from phormium tenax fibres. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21:319-328.
15. Fortunati E., Puglia D., Luzi F., Santulli C., Torre L., Kenny J.M. Binary PVA bio-nanocomposites containing cellulose nanocrystals extracted from different natural sources: Part I. Carbohyd. Polym. 2013, 97:825-836.
16. Gandolfi S., Ottolina G., Riva S., Pedrocchi Fantoni G., Patel I. Complete chemical analysis of carmagnola hemp hurds and structural features of its components. Bioresources 2013, 8:2641-2656.
17. Gnanasambandam R., Proctor A. Preparation of soy hull pectin. Food Chem. 1999, 65:461-467.
18. Henriksson M., Henriksson G., Berglund L.A., Lindström T. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43:3434-3441.
19. Kabir M.M., Wang H., Lau K.T., Cardona F. Effects of chemical treatments on hemp fibre structure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 276:13-23.
20. Kim U.J., Eom S.H., Wada M. Thermal decomposition of native cellulose: influence on crystallite size. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95:778-781.
21. Kim H.J., Eom Y.G. Thermogravimetric analysis of rice husk flour for a new raw material of lignocellulosic fiber thermoplastic polymer composites. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2001, 20:59-67.
22. Kovur S.K., Schenzel K.C., Grimm E., Diepenbrock W. Characterization of refined hemp fibers using nirftraman micro spectroscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopy. Bioresources 2008, 3:1081-1091.
23. Kumar S., Gupta R., Lee Y.Y., Gupta R.B. Cellulose pretreatment in subcritical water: effect of temperature on molecular structure and enzymatic reactivity. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1337-1347.
24. Laureano-Perez L., Teymouri F., Alizadeh H., Dale B. Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121-124:1081-1099.
25. Li S.Y., Stuart J.D., Li Y., Parnas R.S. The feasibility of converting Cannabis sativa L. oil into biodiesel. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8457-8460.
26. Li X., Tabil L.G., Panigrahia S. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J. Polym. Environ. 2007, 15:25-33.
27. Li Y., Pickering K.L. Hemp fibre reinforced composites using chelator and enzyme treatments. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68:3293-3298.
28. Mandal A., Chakrabarty D. Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohyd. Polym. 2011, 86:1291-1299.
29. Morán J.I., Alvarez V.A., Cyras V.P., Vázquez A. Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 2008, 15:149-159.
30. Mwaikambo L.Y., Ansell M.P. Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 84:2222-2234.
31. Ouajai S., Shanks R.A. Morphology and structure of hemp fibre after bioscouring. Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5:124-134.
32. Pakarinen A., Zhang J., Brock T., Maijala P., Viikari L. Enzymatic accessibility of fiber hemp is enhanced by enzymatic or chemical removal of pectin. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 107:275-281.
33. Thygesen A., Oddershede J., Lilholt H., Thomsen A.B., Stahl K. On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 2005, 12:563-576.
34. Wang N., Ding E., Cheng R. Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 2007, 48:3486-3493.