National multi-institutional comparison of 30-day postoperative complication and readmission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using NSQIP

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 430-436

  Pilecki, Matthew A ^a   Mcguire, Barry B ^a   Jain, Umang ^a   Kim, John Y S ^a   Nadler, Robert B ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DATA BASE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DYSPNEA; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SMOKING; UNITED STATES; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VERY ELDERLY; WOUND COMPLICATION; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84897000531     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0656     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Walsh PC. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. J Urol 2005;174:1291
2. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1117-1123
3. Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 2009;98:76
4. Rau J. Hospitals face pressure to avert readmissions. New York Times. November 26, 2012. Available at www .nytimes.com/2012/11/27/health/hospitals- face-pressure-frommedicare- To-Avert-readmissions.html?.-r = 0 (last accessed December 24, 2013
5. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Pub L No. 111-148
6. Jencks SF. Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program (vol 360, pg 1418, 2009). N Engl J Med 2011;364:1582
7. Readmissions Reduction Program. Available at http://cms .gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/Acute InpatientPPS/Readmissions- Reduction-Program.html/ (last accessed January 5, 2013
8. Hofer MD, Meeks JJ, Cashy J, et al. Impact of increasing prevalence of minimally invasive prostatectomy on open prostatectomy observed in the national inpatient sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement program. J Endourol 2013;27:102-107
9. Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Jr., Steeger JE, et al. Toward robust information: Data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210:6-16
10. American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use Data File [Internet]. Available at http://site.acsnsqip .org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2011-User-Guide-Final .pdf (last accessed April 8, 2013
11. Rowell KS, Turrentine FE, Hutter MM, et al. Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:1293-1300
12. Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207: 777-782
13. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Available at www.acsnsqip.org (last accessed January 2013
14. American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use File [NSQIP Online User Guide]. Available at http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/03/2011-User-Guide-Final.pdf (last accessed March 10, 2013
15. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Hall BL. Interpretation of the C-statistic in the context of ACS-NSQIP models. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18 Suppl 3:S295; author reply S296, 2011
16. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, et al. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: Morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208: 1009-1016
17. Paul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow, S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med 2013;32:67-80
18. Froehner M, Novotny V, Koch R, et al. Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: Open versus robotassisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int 2013;90:312-315
19. Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, et al. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urology 2013;82: 579-583
20. Chung SD, Kelle JJ, Huang CY, et al. Comparison of 90- day re-Admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). BJU Int 2012;110:E966-E971
21. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007;177:929-931
22. Pierorazio PM, Mullins JK, Ross AE, et al. Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): A 20-year institutional experience. BJU Int 2013; 112:45-53
23. Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, et al. Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008;179:1811-1817
24. Kowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF, et al. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: Results from the 100% Medicare sample. Eur Urol 2012;61:803-809
25. Yu X, Elliott SP, Wilt TJ, et al. Practice patterns in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical therapy: The dramatic increase in minimally invasive technologies. J Urol 2008; 180:241-245
26. Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 2010;24:270-276
27. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302:1557-1564
28. Skarecky DW. Robotic-Assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: Surgical evolution or new paradigm. ISRN Urol 2013;2013:157379
29. Tan TW, Kalish JA, Hamburg NM, et al. Shorter duration of femoral-popliteal bypass is associated with decreased surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:512-518
30. Evangelista LS, Doering LV, Dracup K. Usefulness of a history of tobacco and alcohol use in predicting multiple heart failure readmissions among veterans. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1339-1342.