Application strategies for neuroscience in information systems design science research

Journal of Computer Information Systems

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1-13

  Vom Brocke, Jan ^a   Riedl, René ^b   Léger, Piere Majorique ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN   (Liechtenstein)

^b JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^c HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Affective computing; Design science research; EEG; FMRI; Neuroergonomics; Neuroscience

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTATION THEORY; DESIGN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; TAXONOMIES;

AFFECTIVE COMPUTING; DESIGN-SCIENCE RESEARCHES; FMRI; NEUROERGONOMICS; NEUROSCIENCE;

NEUROLOGY;

EID: 84896997031     PISSN: 08874417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645627     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Agarwal R.; Venkatesh V.: Assessing a firm's Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability, Information Systems Research, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 168-186 (2002).
2. Antonenko, P., Paas, F., Grabner, R., van Gog, T.: Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load, Educational Psychology Review, Publisher: Springer Netherlands, pp.: 425-438 22(4) (2010).
3. Arazy, O., Kumar, N., Shapira, B.: A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems: 9(11), Article 2. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol11/iss9/2 (2010).
4. Ariely D., Berns G.S. Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature Review Neuroscience, 11:284-92 (2010).
5. Bandara, W., Gable, G.G., Rosemann, M.: Factors and Measures of Business Process Modelling: Model Building through a Multiple Case Study. European Journal of Information Systems 14(4), 347-360 (2005).
6. Bar, M., & Neta, M.: Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645-648 (2006).
7. Bar M. & Neta, M: Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45(10):2191-2200.
8. Baskerville, R.L., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V., Straub, D., A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum, European Journal of Information Systems 20, 11-15 (2011).
9. Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory Design Theory, Business & Information Systems Engineering: 2(5), 271-282 (2010).
10. Batra, D., & Marakas, G.M.: Conceptual Data Modeling in Theory and Practice. European Journal of Information Systems 4(3), 185-193 (1995).
11. Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (1999). A spelling device for the paralyzed. Nature, 398, 297-298.
12. Brad S.M.; Michael S.F.: FEATURE: Neuroscience and the future of human-computer interaction. interactions 16, 2 (March 2009), pp. 70-75 (2009).
13. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Larsen, J. T., Poehlmann, K.M., & Ito, T.A.: The psychophysiology of emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 173-191). New York: Guilford Press (2000).
14. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G.: Handbook of psychophysiology, 3rd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press (2007).
15. Camerer C; Loewenstein G; Prelec D.: Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), pp.: 9-64 (2005).
16. Carroll, J.M: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000).
17. Davis, F. D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, pp. 319-339 (1989).
18. Dimoka, A., Banker, R.D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F.D., Dennis, A.R., Dimoka, A., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A., Kenning, P., Müller-Putz, G., Pavlou, P.A., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Weber, B.: On the Use of Neurophysiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly, Volume 36, Number 3, 2021, 679-702.
19. Dimoka, A., Davis, F. D.: Where Does TAM Reside in the Brain? The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Technology Adoption. ICIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper 169 (2008).
20. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., Davis, F. D.: NeuroIS: The Potential of Cognitive Neuroscience for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 22(4), pp. 687-702 (2011).
21. Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P.A., Davis, F.D.: NEURO-IS: The Potential of Cognitive Neuroscience for Information Systems Research, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-20 (2007).
22. Dimoka, A.: What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study. MIS Quarterly 34 (2), pp. 373-396 (2010).
23. Ericsson, K. A., Simon, H. A.: Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251 (1980).
24. Evermann J.; Wand, Y.: Ontological modeling rules for UML: An empirical assessment, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Volume 46, pp. 14-29 (2006).
25. Fagan, M.H.; Neill S.; Wooldridge, B.R.: Exploring the intention to use computers: An empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp. 31-37 (2008).
26. Fischer, G.: User Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1-2), 65-86 (2001).
27. Frank M. J., Cohen M. X., Sanfey A. G.: Multiple Systems in Decision Making: A Neurocomputational Perspective, Current Directions In Psychological Science, 18 (2), pp. 73-77 (2009).
28. Friedman, D., Leeb, R., Guger, C., Steed, A., Pfurtscheller, G., Slater, M.: Navigating Virtual Reality by Thought: What Is It Like? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2007 16:1, 100-110 (2007).
29. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., Steven, M. S.: Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (3rd Ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company (2009).
30. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model, MIS Quarterly (27), pp. 51-90 (2003).
31. Gökcay, D., Yildirim, G. (Eds.). Affective Computing and Interaction: Psychological, Cognitive and Neuroscientific Perspectives (Chapter 14, pp. 308-324). Hershey, PA.: Information Science Reference (2011).
32. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the AIS 8(5), 312-335 (2007).
33. Haier, R.J., Siegel, B.V., MacLachlan, A., Soderling, E., et al.: Regional Glucose Metabolic Changes After Learning a Complex Visuospatial/Motor Task: A Positron Emission Tomographic Study", Brain Research (570), pp. 134-143 (1992).
34. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75-105 (2004).
35. Holzinger, A.: Usability Engineering for Software Developers: Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 71-74 (2005).
36. IBM (2011), http://asmarterplanet.com/blog/2011/12/thenext-5-in-5-mind- reading-is-no-longer-science-fiction.html (access: 27.03.2012).
37. Iske, P.: Mirror of Emotions. Rationalizer emotion awareness for online investor, http://www.design.philips.com/philips/shared/assets/design-assets/pdf/ rationalizer/Leaflet.pdf (access: 27.03.2012).
38. Kahneman, D.: A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, Vol 58(9), Sep 2003, pp. 697-720 (2003).
39. Lee, J.C., Tan, D.S., Using a low-cost electroencephalograph for task classification in HCI research, Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, New York 2006, pp. 81-90 (2006).
40. Lee, S.M.; Chen L.: The Impact of Flow on Online Consumer Behaviour, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp. 1-10 (2010).
41. Leeb, R., Settgast, V., Fellnerb, D., Pfurtschellera, G.: Selfpaced exploration of the Austrian National Library through thought, International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, Vol. 9, No.4, pp. 237-244, (2007).
42. Liapis, C., Chatterjee, S.: On a NeuroIS Design Science Model. In: H. Jain, A.P. Sinha, and P. Vitharana (Eds.): DESRIST 2011, LNCS 6629, 440-451, 2011 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2011).
43. Lieberman, M.D.: Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes, Annual Review of Psychology (58), pp. 259-289 (2007).
44. Lo, A., Repin, D.: The psychophysiology of real-time financial risk processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14, 323-339 (2002).
45. Loos, P., Riedl, R., Müller-Pütz, G.R., vom Brocke, J., Davis, F.D., Banker, R.D., Léger, P.-M.: NeuroIS: Neuroscientific Approaches in the Investigation and Development of Information Systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering 2(6), 395-491 (2010).
46. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251-266 (1995).
47. Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergente knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179-212 (2002).
48. Mauri M., Cipresso P., Balgera, A., et al.: Why Is Facebook So Successful? Psychophysiological Measures Describe a Core Flow State While Using Facebook, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Volume: 14 Issue: 12 Pages: 723-731 (2011).
49. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 48-63 (2007).
50. Mineau, G.W., Missaoui, R., Godinx, R.: Conceptual Modeling for Data and Knowledge Management. Data & Knowledge Engineering 33(2), 137-168 (2000).
51. Moore, M.M., Storey, V.C., Randolph, A.B.: User Profiles for Facilitating Conversations with Locked-in Users, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Las Vegas, pp. 11-24, December 10-14, (2005).
52. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Boston (1993).
53. Ortiz de Guinea, A., Markus, M.L.: Why Break the Habit of a Lifetime? Rethinking the Roles of Intention, Habit, and Emotion in Continuing Information Technology Use, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33 (3), pp. 433-444 (2009).
54. Palmer J.W.: Web site usability, design, and performance metrics, Information Systems Research, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 151-167 (2002).
55. Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M.: Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2008).
56. Parasuraman, R., Wilson, G.F.: Putting the brain to work: Neuroergonomics past, present, and future. Human Factors, 50, pp. 468-474 (2008).
57. Parsons, J, Wand, Y.: Using Cognitive Principles to Guide Classification in Information Systems Modeling, MIS Quarterly 32(4), pp. 839-868 (2008).
58. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45-77 (2008).
59. Picard, R.W.: Affective Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge (1997).
60. Picard, R.W.: Affective Computing: Challenges, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 59, Issues 1-2, July 2003, pp. 55-64 (2003).
61. Randolph, A.B., Karmakar, S., Moore, J.M., "Toward Predicting Control of a Brain-Computer Interface," Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, December 10-14, (2006).
62. Recker, J.: A Socio-Pragmatic Constructionist Framework for Understanding Quality in Process Modelling. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 14(2), 43-63 (2007).
63. Riedl, R., Banker, R.D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F.D., Dennis, A. R., Dimoka, A., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A., Kenning, P., Müller-Putz, G., Pavlou, P.A., Straub, D.W., vom Brocke, J., Weber, B.: On the Foundations of NeuroIS: Reflections on the Gmunden Retreat 2009. Communications of the AIS 27, 243-264 (2010).
64. Riedl, R., Hubert, M., Kenning, P.: Are There Neural Gender Differences in Online Trust? An fMRI Study on the Perceived Trustworthiness of eBay Offers. MIS Quarterly 34(2), pp. 397-428 (2010).
65. Riedl, R., Javor, A.: The Biology of Trust: Integrating Evidence from Genetics, Endocrinology and Functional Brain Imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 5(2), pp. 63-91 (2012).
66. Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., Javor, A.: Technostress From a Neurobiological Perspective: System Breakdown Increases the Stress Hormone Cortisol in Computer Users. Business & Information Systems Engineering 4(2), pp. 61-69 (2012).
67. Riedl, R.; Randolph, A.B.; vom Brocke, J.; Léger, P.-M.; Dimoka, A.: The Potential of Neuroscience for Human-Computer Interaction Research. SIGHCI 2010 Proceedings. Paper 16 (2010).
68. Satpute, A.B., Lieberman, M. D.: Integrating automatic and controlled processing into neurocognitive models of social cognition. Brain Research, 1079, 86-97 (2006).
69. Scherer, R., Lee, F., Schlogl, A., Leeb, R., Bischof, H., Pfurtscheller, G., Toward Self-Paced Brain-Computer Communication: Navigation Through Virtual Worlds, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Volume: 55 Issue:2, pp: 675-682 (2008).
70. Shaw, M.L.G., Gaines, B.R.: Requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal 11(3), 149-165 (1996).
71. Siau K.; Tan X.: Using cognitive mapping techniques to supplement UML and UP in information requirments determination, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Volume 46, pp. 59-66 (2006).
72. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., Ramakrishnan, T.: Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline, MIS Quarterly, (32: 3) pp.467-482 (2008).
73. Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996).
74. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F.: Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665 (2000).
75. Straub D.W., Burton-Jones A., Veni, vidi, vici: Breaking the TAM logjam, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume: 8 Issue: 4 Pages: 223-229 (2007).
76. Tuunanen, T., Peffers, K., Gengler, C.: Wide Audience Requirements Engineering (WARE). A Practical Method and Case Study. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 4(27) (2004), http://sprouts.aisnet.org/4-27.
77. Van Aken, J.: Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-tested and Grounded Technological Rules, Journal of Management Studies, (41) 2, 219-246 (2004).
78. Venkatesh V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp. 342-365 (2000).
79. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478 (2003)
80. vom Brocke, J., Riedl, R., Léger, P.-M.: Neuroscience in Design-oriented Research: Exploring New Potentials. In: H. Jain, A.P. Sinha, and P. Vitharana (Eds.): DESRIST 2011, LNCS 6629, 427-439, 2011 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2011).
81. Walls J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., El Sawy, O. A., Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36-59 (1992).
82. Wang, S., Wang, H., Towards Innovative Design Research in Information Systems, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 11-18.
83. Whalen P.J.: Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity: Initial neuroimaging studies of the human amygdala, Current Directions in Psychological Science, Volume: 7 Issue: 6 Pages: 177-188 (1998).
84. Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control, Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, volume 113 issue 6, pp. 767-791 (2002).
85. www.desrist.org, Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (access: May 19 2012).
86. www.economist.com/node/21527030, Put your thinking cap on, Consumer electronics: Once the stuff of fables, hoaxes and science fiction, controlling things via thought alone is fast becoming a reality, The economist, Technology Quarterly: Q3 2011 (access: May 19 2012).
87. http://www.neurois.org (access: May 19 2012).
88. Zald D.H.: The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli, Brain Research Reviews Volume: 41 Issue: 1 Pages: 88-123 Article Number: PII S0165-0173(02)00248-5 DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0173(02)00248-5 (2003).
89. Zhai, J., Barreto, A., Chin, C., Li, C.: User stress detection in human-computer interactions. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 41(2): 277-286 (2005).