Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 393-398

  Poniatowski, Lauren H ^a   Wolf, J Stuart ^b   Nakada, Stephen Y ^c   Reihsen, Troy E ^a   Sainfort, François ^d   Sweet, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLACK LIGHT ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; SIMULATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETER; UROLOGIST;

HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; URETER; UROLOGY;

EID: 84896994180     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0678     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2004;240:518-528
2. Soper NJ, Fried GM. The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: Its time has come. Bull Am Coll Surg 2008;93:30-32
3. Sweet RM, Beach R, Sainfort F, et al. Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum. J Endourol 2012;26:190-196
4. Carr MC, Casale P. Anomalies and surgery of the ureter in children. In: Wien AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, et al., eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc., 2012, pp 3217-3221
5. Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, et al. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol 2008;180:1397-1402
6. Raza SJ, Soomroo KQ, Ather MH. ''Latex glove'' laparoscopic pyeloplasty model: A novel method for simulated training. Urol J 2011;8:283-286
7. Ooi J, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DL. Training model for open or laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2006;20:149-152
8. Ramachandran A, Kurien A, Patil P, et al. A novel training model for laparoscopic pyeloplasty using chicken crop. J Endourol 2008;22:725-728
9. Fu B, Zhang X, Lang B, et al. New model for training in laparoscopic dismembered ureteropyeloplasty. J Endourol 2007;21:1381-1385
10. Yang B, Zhang Z, Xiao L, et al. A novel training model for retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2010;24:1345-1349
11. Sweet RM, Hananel D, Lawrenz F. A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training. Arch Surg 2010;145:197-201
12. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: Rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1525-1529
13. Sundaram CP, Grubb RL 3rd, Rehman J, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003;169:2037-2040
14. Matsumoto ED, Cadeddu JA: Laparoscopic reconstructive renal surgery. In: Wetter PA, Kavic MS, Levinson CJ, et al., eds. Prevention and Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications. 2nd ed. Miami: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Inc., 2005, p 491
15. Neulander EZ, Romanowski I, Assali M, et al. Renal pelvis flap-guide for ureteral spatulation and handling during dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 2006;68:1336-1338.