Endothelial repair process and its relevance to longitudinal neointimal tissue patterns: Comparing histology with in silico modelling

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 11, Issue 94, 2014, Pages

  Tahir, Hannan ^a   Bona Casas, Carles ^a   Narracott, Andrew James ^b   Iqbal, Javaid ^b   Gunn, Julian ^b   Lawford, Patricia ^b   Hoekstra, Alfons G ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c ITMO UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Computer modelling; Endothelial cells; In stent restenosis; Neointimal patterns; Re endothelialization

Indexed keywords

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HISTOLOGY; REPAIR;

COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; COMPUTER MODELLING; ENDOTHELIAL PROGENITOR CELLS; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; HISTOLOGICAL SECTION; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; NEOINTIMAL PATTERNS; RE-ENDOTHELIALIZATION;

STENTS;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL REGENERATION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY STENT; ENDOTHELIAL PROGENITOR CELL; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HISTOLOGY; IN VIVO STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; NEOINTIMA; NONHUMAN; SIMULATION; SWINE; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE SECTION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; METABOLISM; NEOINTIMAL PATTERNS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RE-ENDOTHELIALIZATION; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM;

COMPUTER MODELLING; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; NEOINTIMAL PATTERNS; RE-ENDOTHELIALIZATION;

ANIMALS; CORONARY VESSELS; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; NEOINTIMA; SWINE;

EID: 84896977002     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0022     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Serruys PW et al. 1991 Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. N. Engl. J. Med. 324, 13-17. (doi:10.1056/NEJM199101033240103)
2. Iqbal J, Gunn J, Serruys PW. 2013 Coronary stents: historical development, current status and future directions. Br. Med. Bull. 106, 193-211. (doi:10.1093/bmb/ldt009)
3. Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R. 2010 In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J. Am. College Cardiol. 56, 1897-1907. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.028)
4. Iqbal J, Sumaya W, Tatman V, Parviz Y, Morton A, Grech E, Campbell S, Storey RF, Gunn J. 2013 Incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis: a single-centre study of 5,833 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting. Eurointervention 9, 62-69. (doi:10.4244/EIJV9I1A10)
5. Clopath P, Müller K, Stäubli W, Bürk R. 1979 In vivo and in vitro studies on endothelial regeneration. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 8, 149-157. (doi:10.1159/000214307)
6. Schwartz S, Haudenschild CC, Eddy E. 1978 Endothelial regneration. I. Quantitative analysis of initial stages of endothelial regeneration in rat aortic intima. Lab Invest. 38, 568.
7. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. 1999 Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ. Res. 85, 221-228. (doi:10.1161/01.RES.85.3.221)
8. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. 1997 Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275, 964-966. (doi:10.1126/science. 275.5302.964)
9. Hagensen MK, Vanhoutte PM, Bentzon JF. 2012 Arterial endothelial cells: still the craftsmen of regenerated endothelium. Cardiovasc. Res. 95, 281-289. (doi:10.1093/cvr/cvs182)
10. Siddique A, Shantsila E, Lip GY, Varma C. 2010 Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist? Vasc. Cell 2, 6.
11. Itoh Y, Toriumi H, Yamada S, Hoshino H, Suzuki N. 2010 Resident endothelial cells surrounding damaged arterial endothelium reendothelialize the lesion. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30, 1725-1732. (doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA. 110.207365)
12. Tahir H, Bona-Casas C, Hoekstra AG. 2013 Modelling the effect of a functional endothelium on the development of in-stent restenosis. PLoS ONE 8, e66138. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066138)
13. Morton AC, Arnold ND, Crossman DC, Gunn J. 2004 Response of very small (2 mm) porcine coronary arteries to balloon angioplasty and stent implantation. Heart 90, 324-327. (doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.015305)
14. Morton AC, Arnold ND, Gunn J, Varcoe R, Francis SE, Dower SK, Crossman D. 2005 Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist alters the response to vessel wall injury in a porcine coronary artery model. Cardiovasc. Res. 68, 493-501. (doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.06.026)
15. Malik N, Gunn J, Holt C, Shepherd L, Francis S, Newman C, Crossman DC, Cumberland DC. 1998 Intravascular stents: a new technique for tissue processing for histology, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Heart 80, 509-516. (Pubitemid 28535543)
16. Caiazzo A et al. 2011 A complex automata approach for in-stent restenosis: two-dimensional multiscale modelling and simulations. J. Comput. Sci. 2, 9-17. (doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.09.002)
17. Evans DJW et al. 2008 The application of multiscale modelling to the process of development and prevention of stenosis in a stented coronary artery. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 3343-3360. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0081)
18. Tahir H, Hoekstra AG, Lorenz E, Lawford PV, Hose DR, Gunn J, Evans DJW. 2011 Multi-scale simulations of the dynamics of in-stent restenosis: impact of stent deployment and design. Interface Focus 1, 365-373. (doi:10.1098/rsfs.2010. 0024)
19. Hegewald J, Krafczyk M, Tölke J, Hoekstra A, Chopard B. 2008 An agent-based coupling platform for complex automata, pp. 227-233. Berlin, Germany: Springer Computational Science-ICCS.
20. Hegewald J. 2010 The multiscale coupling library and environment (MUSCLE). See http://muscle.berlios.de/.
21. Borgdorff J, Falcone J-L, Lorenz E, Bona-Casas C, Chopard B, Hoekstra AG. 2013 Foundations of distributed multiscale computing: formalization, specification, and analysis. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 73, 465-483. (doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2012.12.011)
22. Borgdorff J, Mamonski M, Bosak B, Groen D, Belgacem MB, Kurowski K, Hoekstra AG. 2013 Multiscale computing with the multiscale modeling library and runtime environment. Proc. Comput. Sci. 18, 1097-1105. (doi:10.1016/j.procs. 2013.05.275)
23. Gunn J, Arnold N, Chan K, Shepherd L, Cumberland D, Crossman D. 2002 Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima. Heart 88, 401-405. (doi:10.1136/heart.88.4.401)
24. Johnson KL, Johnson KKL. 1987 Contact mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Popov VL. 2010 Contact mechanics and friction: physical principles and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
26. Pathmanathan P, Cooper J, Fletcher A, Mirams G, Murray P, Osborne J, Pitt-Francis J, Walter A, Chapman SJ. 2009 A computational study of discrete mechanical tissue models. Phys. Biol. 6, 036001. (doi:10.1088/1478-3975/6/3/ 036001)
27. Breton M, Berrou E, Brahimi-Horn M, Deudon E, Picard J. 1986 Synthesis of sulfated proteoglycans throughout the cell cycle in smooth muscle cells from pig aorta. Exp. Cell Res. 166, 416-426. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(86)90487-8)
28. Harnek J, Zoucas E, Carlemalm E, Cwikiel W. 1999 Differences in endothelial injury after balloon angioplasty, insertion of balloon-expanded stents or release of self-expanding stents: an electron microscopic experimental study. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 22, 56-61. (doi:10.1007/s002709900329)
29. de Prado AP et al. 2011 Time course of reendothelialization of stents in a normal coronary swine model. Vet. Pathol. Online 48, 1109-1117. (doi:10.1177/0300985811400446)
30. Guo X, Kassab G. 2009 Role of shear stress on nitrite and NOS protein content in different size conduit arteries of swine. Acta Physiol. 197, 99-106. (doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01999.x)
31. Nakazawa G et al. 2010 Anti-CD34 antibodies immobilized on the surface of sirolimus-eluting stents enhance stent endothelialization. JACC Interv. 3, 68. (doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.09.015)
32. Tsuzuki M. 2009 Bone marrow-derived cells are not involved in reendothelialized endothelium as endothelial cells after simple endothelial denudation in mice. Basic Res. Cardiol. 104, 601-611. (doi:10.1007/s00395-009- 0021-7)
33. Hagensen MK, Shim J, Thim T, Falk E, Bentzon JF. 2010 Circulating endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to plaque endothelium in murine atherosclerosis. Circulation 121, 898-905. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109. 885459)
34. Hagensen MK, Raarup MK, Mortensen MB, Thim T, Nyengaard JR, Falk E, Bentzon JF. 2012 Circulating endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to regeneration of endothelium after murine arterial injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 93, 223-231. (doi:10.1093/cvr/cvr278)
35. Ando J, Nomura H, Kamiya A. 1987 The effect of fluid shear stress on the migration and proliferation of cultured endothelial cells. Microvasc. Res. 33, 62-70. (doi:10.1016/0026-2862(87)90007-0)
36. Simmers MB, Pryor AW, Blackman BR. 2007 Arterial shear stress regulates endothelial cell-directed migration, polarity, and morphology in confluent monolayers. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293, H1937-H1946. (doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00534.2007)
37. Kassab GS, Berkley J, Fung Y-CB. 1997 Analysis of pig's coronary arterial blood flow with detailed anatomical data. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25, 204-217. (doi:10.1007/BF02738551)
38. Berk BC. 2008 Atheroprotective signaling mechanisms activated by steady laminar flow in endothelial cells. Circulation 117, 1082-1089. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.720730)