Inclusionary zoning

Housing America: Building Out of a Crisis

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 109-130

  Powell, Benjamin ^a   Stringham, Edward P ^b  

^a SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896944323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203789742-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Association of Bay Area Governments (2001) “Regional Housing Needs Determination for the San Francisco Bay Area. 2001–2006 Housing Element Cycle.” Oakland, CA: Association of Bay Area Governments.
2. Bay Area Economics (2003) “They Bay Area Case Studies, Report to the City of San Jose,” pp. 53–62, in The California Inclusionary Housing Reader. Sacramento: Institute for Local Government.
3. Burchel, Robert and Galley, Catherine (2003) “Inclusionary Zoning: Pros and Cons” pp. 27–31 in The California Inclusionary Housing Reader. Sacramento: Institute for Local Government.
4. Calavita, Nico and Victoria Basolo (2004) “Policy Claims with Weak Evidence: A Critique of the Reason Foundation Study on Inclusionary Housing Policy in the San Francisco Bay Area.” at 11 (Unpublished, June 2004).
5. Calavita, Nico and Kenneth Grimes, (1998) “Inclusionary Housing in California: The Experience of Two Decades” Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 150–169.
6. California Affordable Housing Law Project and Western Center on Law & Poverty (2002) Inclusionary zoning: Policy Considerations and Best Practices. Oakland, CA: California Affordable Housing Law Project.
7. California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California (2003) Inclusionary Housing in California: 30 Years of Innovation. Sacramento, CA: California Coalition for Rural Housing.
8. California Department of Housing and Community Development. (2001) Pay to Play: Residential Development Fees in California Cities and Counties, 1999.
9. California Department of Housing and Community Development. Diet derich Andrew (1996) “An Egalitarian’s Market: The Economics of Inclusionary Zoning Reclaimed,” Fordham Urb. L.J. 24: 22–104.
10. Ellickson, Robert C. (1982) “The Irony of ‘Inclusionary Zoning’” in Resolving the Housing Crisis: Government Policy, Decontrol, and the Public Interest (edited by M. Bruce Johnson), pp. 135–87. San Francisco: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research.
11. Glaeser, Edward L., Joseph Gyourko, Raven Saks (2004) “Why is Manhattan So Expensive? Regulation and the Rise in House Price” NBER Working Paper No. 10124, 2004.
12. Goetz, Edward, Promoting (1991) “Low-Income Housing Through Innovations in Landuse Regulations,” Journal of Urban Affairs 13 (3): 337–351.
13. Green, Richard K., Stephen Malpezzi, and Stephen K. Mayo (1999) “Metropolitan-Specific Estimates of the Price Elasticity of Supply of Housing, and Their Sources” Wisconsin-Madison CULER working papers 99–16, 1999.
14. Hanushek, Eric and John Quigley (1980) “What is the Price Elasticity of Housing Demand?” Rev. Econ. & Statistics 62(3): 449–54.
15. Joseph, Brian “Palm Springs resale restriction pinches residents,” The Desert Sun, June 23, 2003.
16. Kautz, Barbara (2002) “In Defense of Inclusionary Zoning: Successfully Creating Affordable Housing” University of San Francisco Law Review 36: 971–1026.
17. Monterey Staff Report (2003) “How Did We Do? 17 Recommendations for the Monterey County Inclusionary Program,” pp. 63–76. The California Inclusionary Housing Reader. Sacramento: Institute for Local Government.
18. Morgan, Terri “Loosened Rules Lure Developers to Watsonville” San Jose Mercury News, Sat Oct. 18, 2003.
19. Paton, Dean “The equity debate,” The Pinnacle, Vol. 17, No. 52, September 25, 2003.
20. Powell, Benjamin and Stringham, Edward (2003) “‘Affordable’ Housing Laws Make Homes More Expensive” Economic Education Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 12 (December 2003) 1–8.
21. Powell, Benjamin and Stringham, Edward (2004a) “Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work? Evidence from Los Angeles County and Orange County” Reason Foundation Policy Study 320. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute, June 2004, pp. 1-5, pp. 1–26.
22. Powell, Benjamin and Stringham, Edward (2004b) “Supply and Affordability: Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work?” Reason Foundation Policy Study 318. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute, April 2004, pp. 1-5, pp. 1–45.
23. Powell, Benjamin and Stringham, Edward (2006) “The Economics of Inclusionary Zoning Reclaimed: How Effective are Price Controls?” Florida State University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2: 471-499.
24. Quigley, John and Raphael, Steven (2004) “Is housing Unaffordable? Why Isn’t It More Affordable?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18: 191–214.
25. Rawson, Michael et al. (2002) “Inclusionary Zoning: Policy Considerations and Best Practices.” Sacramento, CA: California Affordable Housing Law Project of the Public Interest Law Project.
26. Simon, Ruth (2005) “The Nation’s Least Affordable Housing Markets,” Wall St. J., January 12, 2005: D2.
27. Sharon Simonson (2004) “City eases rules to speed condo construction” Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal, July 23, p.1, p.40.
28. Stoll, Michael (2002) “Mission Bay Takes Shape,” San Francisco Examiner, September 13, 2002.
29. Tetreault, Bernard, (2000) “Arguments Against Inclusionary Zoning You Can Anticipate Hearing.” New Century Housing Vol. 1 No. 2: 17–20.
30. Tucker, William (1990) Zoning, Rent Control, and Affordable Housing, Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
31. Weikel, Dan “Coast Homes Battle Grows” LA Times, December 1, 2003.