Estimating Effects of Tidal Power Projects and Climate Change on Threatened and Endangered Marine Species and Their Food Web

Conservation Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1190-1200

  Busch, D Shallin ^a   Greene, Correigh M ^a   Good, Thomas P ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Acidificaci n oce nica; Energ a renovable; Estudio de riesgo; Interacciones tr ficas; Ocean acidification; Puget Sound; Renewable energy; Risk assessment; Sonda de Puget; Trophic interactions

Indexed keywords

ACIDIFICATION; AQUATIC ORGANISM; ARRAY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOODING; FOOD WEB; POLLUTION EFFECT; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TIDAL POWER; TROPHIC INTERACTION; TURBINE;

PUGET SOUND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ACIDIFICACIÓN OCEÁNICA; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENERGÍA RENOVABLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ESTUDIO DE RIESGO; FOOD CHAIN; INTERACCIONES TRÓFICAS; LEGAL ASPECT; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PUGET SOUND; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SONDA DE PUGET; THEORETICAL MODEL; TROPHIC INTERACTIONS; UNITED STATES; WATER FLOW;

ACIDIFICACIÓN OCEÁNICA; ENERGÍA RENOVABLE; ESTUDIO DE RIESGO; INTERACCIONES TRÓFICAS; OCEAN ACIDIFICATION; PUGET SOUND; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SONDA DE PUGET; TROPHIC INTERACTIONS;

AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POWER PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 84896923365     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12164     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ainsworth, C. H., J. F. Samhouri, D. S. Busch, W. W. L. Chueng, J. Dunne, and T. A. Okey 2011. Potential impacts of climate change on Northeast Pacific marine fisheries and food webs. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68:1217-1229.
2. Amaral, S., N. Perkins, D. Giza, and B. McMahon 2011. Evaluation of fish injury and mortality associated with hydrokinetic turbines. Report 1024569, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
3. Battin, J., M. W. Wiley, M. H. Ruckelshaus, R. N. Palmer, E. Korb, K. K. Bartz, and H. Imaki 2007. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:6720-6725.
4. Boehlert, G. W., and A. B. Gill 2010. Environmental and ecological effects of ocean renewable energy development: a current synthesis. Oceanography 23:68-81.
5. Brown, C. J., et al. 2009. Effects of climate-driven primary production change on marine food webs: implications for fisheries and conservation. Global Change Biology 16:1194-1212.
6. Busch, D. S., C. J. Harvey, and P. McElhany 2013. Potential impacts of ocean acidification on the Puget Sound food web. ICES Journal of Marine Science 70:823-833.
7. Cada, G. F., J. Loar, L. A. Garrison, R. K. Fisher Jr., and D. Neitzel 2006. Efforts to reduce mortality to hydroelectric turbine-passed fish: locating and quantifying damaging shear stresses. Environmental Management 37:898-906.
8. Chamberlain, D. E., M. R. Rehfisch, A. D. Fox, M. Desholm, and S. J. Anthony 2006. The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models. Ibis 148:198-202.
9. Christensen, V., and C. J. Walters 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecosystem Modeling 172:109-139.
10. Cornell, H. 2011. Impacts of natural events and human activities on the ecosystem: climate change. Puget Sound Partnership, Tacoma, Washington.
11. Dadswell, M. J., and R. A. Rulifson 1994. Macrotidal estuaries: a region of collision between migratory marine animals and tidal power development. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 51:93-113.
12. Good, T. P., T. K. Harms, and M. H. Ruckelshaus 2003. Misuse of checklist assessments in endangered species recovery efforts. Conservation Ecology 7:12.
13. Harvey, C. J., et al. 2010. A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-106.
14. Harvey, C. J., G. D. Williams, and P. S. Levin 2012. Food web structure and trophic control in central Puget Sound. Estuaries and Coasts 35:821-838.
15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the 4th assessment report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. Kaplan, I. C., P. S. Levin, M. Burden, and E. A. Fulton 2010. Fishing catch shares in the face of global change: a framework for integrating cumulative impacts and single species management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Science 67:1968-1982.
17. Linkov, I., D. Loney, S. Cormier, F. K. Satterstrom, and T. Bridge 2009. Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Science of the Total Environment 407:5199-5205.
18. McCarthy, M. A., et al. 2004. Comparing predictions of extinction risk using models and subjective judgment. Acta Oecologica 26:67-74.
19. Mote, P. W., A. Petersen, S. Reeder, H. Shipman, and L. W. Binder 2008. Sea level rise in the coastal waters of Washington State. Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle and Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington.
20. NRC (National Research Council). 2010. Ocean acidification: a national strategy to meet the challenges of a changing ocean. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
21. Normandeau Associates. 2009. An estimation of survival and injury of fish passed through the Hydro Green Energy hydrokinetic system, and a characterization of fish entrainment potential at the Mississippi Lock and Dam No. 2 Hydroelectric Project (p-4306), Hastings, Minnesota. Prepared for Hydro Green Energy LLC, Houston, Texas.
22. Polagye, B., B. Van Cleve, A. Copping, and K. Kirkendall 2011. Environmental effects of tidal energy development. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. F/SPO-116:181.
23. Snohomish County Public Utility District. 2011. Admiralty Inlet pilot tidal project (FERC project no. 12690) draft biological assessment. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1. Everett, Washington.
24. Snover, A. K., P. W. Mote, L. W. Binder, A. F. Hamlet, and N. J. Mantua 2005. Uncertain future: climate change and its effects on Puget Sound. Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
25. Wilson, B., R. S. Batty, F. Daunt, and C. Carter 2007. Collision risks between marine renewable energy devices and mammals, fish and diving birds. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland.