The Incredible Complexity of Being? Degrees of Influence, Coercion, and Control of the "Autonomy" of Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa Patients: Commentary on "Anorexia Nervosa: The Diagnosis: A Postmodern Ethics Contribution to the Bioethics Debate on Involuntary Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa" by Sacha Kendall

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 41-42

  Carney, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Coercion into treatment; Medical ethics; Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa; Social construction

Indexed keywords

ANOREXIA NERVOSA; BENEFICENCE; HUMAN; MENTAL CAPACITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

ANOREXIA NERVOSA; BENEFICENCE; COERCION; HUMANS; MENTAL COMPETENCY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 84896920670     PISSN: 11767529     EISSN: 18724353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-013-9506-z     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Brookbanks, W. 2001. Therapeutic jurisprudence: Conceiving an ethical framework. Journal of Law and Medicine 8(3): 328-341.
2. Kendall, S. 2014. Anorexia nervosa: The diagnosis: A postmodern ethics contribution to the bioethics debate on involuntary treatment for anorexia nervosa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(1). doi: 10. 1007/s11673-013-9496-x.
3. Touyz, S. W., and T. Carney. 2010. Compulsory (involuntary) treatment for anorexia nervosa. In The treatment of eating disorders: A clinical handbook, ed. C. M. Grilo and J. E. Mitchell, 212-224. New York: The Guilford Press.