When beech strikes back: How strict nature conservation reduces herb-layer diversity and productivity in Central European deciduous forests

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 319, Issue , 2014, Pages 51-61

  Mölder, Andreas ^a,b   Streit, Mario ^b   Schmidt, Wolfgang ^b  

^a Section Forest Conservation and Natural Forest Research   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem engineer; Ecosystem functioning; Fagus sylvatica; Forest plant species; Silviculture; Unmanaged vs. managed forests

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM ENGINEER; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING; FAGUS SYLVATICA; MANAGED FOREST; PLANT SPECIES; SILVICULTURE;

COASTAL ZONES; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; ENGINEERS; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRODUCTIVITY; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

DECIDUOUS FOREST; ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HERB; LOGGING (TIMBER); NATURE CONSERVATION; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; SILVICULTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WOODLAND;

CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; FORESTS; PLANTS; PRODUCTIVITY;

GERMANY; HAINICH NATIONAL PARK; THURINGIA;

EID: 84896895355     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.049     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Albert K., Ammer C. Biomasseproduktivität ausgewählter europäischer Mittel- und Niederwaldbestände - Ergebnisse einer vergleichenden Metaanalyse. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2012, 183:225-237.
2. Altman J., Hédl R., Szabó P., Mazůrek P., Riedl V., Müllerová J., Kopecký M., Doležal J. Tree-tings mirror management legacy: dramatic response of standard oaks to past coppicing in Central Europe. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e55770. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055770.
3. Aubert M., Bureau F., Alard D., Bardat J. Effect of tree mixture on the humic epipedon and vegetation diversity in managed beech forests (Normandy, France). Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34:233-248. 10.1139/x03-205.
4. Augusto L., Ranger J., Binkley D., Rothe A. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann. For. Sci. 2002, 59:233-253. 10.1051/forest:2002020.
5. Augusto L., Dupouey J.-L., Ranger J. Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60:823-831. 10.1051/forest:2003077.
6. Axmanová I., Chytrý M., Zelený D., Li C., Vymazalová M., Danihelka J., Horsák M., Kočí M., Kubešová S., Lososová Z., Otýpková Z., Tichý L., Martynenko V.B., Baisheva E.Z., Schuster B., Diekmann M. The species richness-productivity relationship in the herb layer of European deciduous forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21:657-667. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00707.x.
7. Barbier S., Gosselin F., Balandier P. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved - a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2008, 254:1-15. 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038.
8. Bartels S.F., Chen H.Y.H. Interactions between overstorey and understorey vegetation along an overstorey compositional gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 24:543-552. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01479.x.
9. Birks H.J.B. Mind the gap: how open were European primeval forests? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:154-156. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.001.
10. BfN, 2013. WISIA - Wissenschaftliches Informationssystem zum Internationalen Artenschutz. (accessed 15.10.13). http://www.wisia.de.
11. BLE, 2013. Datenbank Naturwaldreservate in Deutschland. (accessed 15.10.13). http://www.naturwaelder.de.
12. BMEL, 2014. Bundeswaldinventur2 - Alle Ergebnisse und Berichte. (accessed 17.01.14). http://www.naturwaelder.de.
13. Boch S., Prati D., Müller J., Socher S., Baumbach H., Buscot F., Gockel S., Hemp A., Hessenmöller D., Kalko E.K.V., Linsenmair K.E., Pfeiffer S., Pommer U., Schöning I., Schulze E.-D., Seilwinder C., Weisser W.W., Wells K., Fischer M. High plant species richness indicates management-related disturbances rather than the conservation status of forests. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2013, 14:496-505. 10.1016/j.baae.2013.06.001.
14. Bolte A. Biomasse- und Elementvorräte der Bodenvegetation auf Flächen des forstlichen Umweltmonitorings in Rheinland-Pfalz (BZE, EU Level II). Ber. Forschzent. Waldökosyst. (Reihe B) 2006, 72:1-29.
15. Borchsenius F., Nielsen P.K., Lawesson J.E. Vegetation structure and diversity of an ancient temperate deciduous forest in SW Denmark. Plant Ecol. 2004, 175:121-135. 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048095.29961.c5.
16. Both S., Fang T., Böhnke M., Bruelheide H., Geißler C., Kühn P., Scholten T., Trogisch S., Erfmeier A. Lack of tree layer control on herb layer characteristics in a subtropical forest, China. J. Veg. Sci. 2011, 22:1120-1131. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01324.x.
17. Brunet J., Falkengren-Grerup U., Tyler G. Herb layer vegetation of south Swedish beech and oak forests - effects of management and soil acidity during one decade. For. Ecol. Manage. 1996, 88:259-272. 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03845-5.
18. Burton J.I., Mladenoff D.J., Clayton M.K., Forrester J.A. The roles of environmental filtering and colonization in the fine-scale spatial patterning of ground-layer plant communities in north temperate deciduous forests. J. Ecol. 2011, 99:764-776. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01807.x.
19. Canham C.D., Denslow J.S., Platt W.J., Runkle J.R., Spies T.A., White P.S. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Can. J. For. Res. 1990, 20:620-631. 10.1139/x90-084.
20. Chávez V., Macdonald S.E. The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixedwood forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:1067-1075. 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.013.
21. Chávez V., Macdonald S.E. Understory species interactions in mature boreal mixedwood forests. Botany 2010, 88:912-922. 10.1080/11263500802410934.
22. Diekmann M. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology - a review. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 4:493-506. 10.1078/1439-1791-00185.
23. Dufrêne M., Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67:345-366.
24. Durak T. Changes in diversity of the mountain beech forest herb layer as a function of the forest management method. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 276:154-164. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.027.
25. Ellenberg, H., Leuschner, C., 2010. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht, Ulmer; Stuttgart.
26. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr. Geobot. 2001, 18:1-264.
27. Ermert R. Die Dynamik der Flora und Vegetation im Naturwald "Hünstollen", Diploma thesis 2003, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen.
28. Ewald J., Jehl H., Braun L., Lohberger E. Die Vegetation des Nationalparks Bayerischer Wald als Ausdruck von Standort und Walddynamik. Tuexenia 2011, 31:9-38.
29. Fischer C., Parth A., Schmidt W. Vegetationsdynamik in Buchen-Naturwäldern. Ein Vergleich aus Süd-Niedersachsen. Hercynia 2009, 42:45-68.
30. Garve E. Rote Liste und Florenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in Niedersachsen und Bremen. Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen 2004, 24:1-76.
31. Geb M., Schmidt W., Meyer P. Das Mittelwaldprojekt Liebenburg - Entwicklung der Bestandesstruktur. Forst Holz 2004, 59:567-573.
32. Gilliam F.S. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 2007, 57:845-858. 10.1641/B571007.
33. Gilliam F.S., Roberts M.S. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America 2003, 38-90. Oxford University Press, New York. F.S. Gilliam, M.R. Roberts (Eds.).
34. Gilliam F.S., Turrill N.L., Adams M.B. Herbaceous-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecol. Appl. 1995, 5:947-955. 10.2307/2269345.
35. Goodall D.W. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot. 1954, 2:304-324.
36. Hagemeier M. Funktionale Kronenarchitektur mitteleuropäischer Baumarten am Beispiel von Hängebirke, Waldkiefer, Traubeneiche, Hainbuche, Winterlinde und Rotbuche. Diss. Bot. 2002, 361:1-154.
37. Härdtle W., von Oheimb G., Westphal C. The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 182:327-338. 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00091-4.
38. Heinrichs S., Schmidt W. Windwurf und Eisbruch im Buchenwald: Eine Chance für Eiche und andere Baumarten? Ergebnisse aus vier Naturwaldreservaten. Forstarchiv 2013, 84:181-197. 10.4432/0300-4112-84-181.
39. Heinrichs S., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Schmidt W. The estimation of aboveground biomass and nutrient pools of understorey plants in closed Norway spruce forests and on clearcuts. Eur. J. For. Res. 2010, 129:613-624. 10.1007/s10342-010-0362-7.
40. Heinrichs S., Winterhoff W., Schmidt W. Vegetation dynamics of beech forests on limestone in central Germany over half a century - effects of climate change, forest management, eutrophication or game browsing?. Biodivers. Ecol. 2012, 4:49-61. 10.7809/b-e.00059.
41. Heiri C., Wolf A., Rohrer L., Bugmann H. Forty years of natural dynamics in Swiss beech forests: structure, composition, and the influence of former management. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19:1920-1934. 10.1890/08-0516.1.
42. Hermy M., Honnay O., Firbank L., Grashof-Bokdam C., Lawesson J.E. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol. Conserv. 1999, 91:9-22. 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00045-2.
43. Hill M.O., Gauch H.G. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 1980, 42:47-58.
44. Howard L.F., Lee T.D. Temporal patterns of vascular plant diversity in southeastern New Hampshire forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 185:5-20. 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00243-3.
45. Huss J., Butler Manning D. Entwicklungsdynamik eines buchendominierten "Naturwald"-Dauerbeobachtungsbestands auf Kalk im Nationalpark Hainich/Thüringen. Waldökol. onl. 2006, 3:67-81.
46. Huston M.A. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Jacob M., Viedenz K., Polle A., Thomas F.M. Leaf litter decomposition in temperate deciduous forest stands with a decreasing fraction of beech (Fagus sylvatica). Oecologia 2010, 164:1083-1094. 10.1007/s00442-010-1699-9.
48. Job H. Welche Nationalparke braucht Deutschland?. Raumforsch. Raumordn. 2010, 68:75-89. 10.1007/s13147-010-0013-y.
49. Jolls C.L. Populations of and threats to rare plants of the herb layer: more challenges and opportunities for conservation biologists. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America 2003, 105-159. Oxford University Press, New York. F.S. Gilliam, M.R. Roberts (Eds.).
50. Jones C.G., Lawton J.H., Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69:373-386. 10.2307/3545850.
51. Kompa T., Schmidt W. Zur Verjüngungssituation in südniedersächsischen Buchen-Windwurfgebieten nach einem lokalen Orkan von 1997. Forstarchiv 2006, 77:3-19.
52. Korsch H., Westhus W. Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta) Thüringens. Naturschutzreport 2011, 26:366-390.
53. Küchler-Krischun J., Walter A.M. National Strategy on Biological Diversity 2007, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), Berlin.
54. Lambertz B. Vegetation und Vegetationsdynamik im Naturwald "Hünstollen", Diploma thesis 1993, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen.
55. Langenbruch C., Helfrich M., Flessa H. Effects of beech (Fagus sylvatica), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and lime (Tilia spec.) on soil chemical properties in a mixed deciduous forest. Plant Soil 2012, 352:389-403. 10.1007/s11104-011-1004-7.
56. Leuschner C., Jungkunst H.F., Fleck S. Functional role of forest diversity: pros and cons of synthetic stands and across-site comparisons in established forests. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2009, 10:1-9. 10.1016/j.baae.2008.06.001.
57. Mabry C.M., Gerken M.E., Thompson J.R. Seasonal storage of nutrients by perennial herbaceous species in undisturbed and disturbed deciduous hardwood forests. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2008, 11:37-44. 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2008.tb00202.x.
58. Magurran A.E. Measuring Biological Diversity 2004, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
59. Martin K.L., Hix D.M., Goebel P.C. Coupling of vegetation layers and environmental influences in a mature, second-growth Central Hardwood forest landscape. For. Ecol. Manage. 2011, 261:720-729. 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.001.
60. McCune, B., Mefford, M.J., 2006. PC-ORD (multivariate analysis of ecological data), version 5.12. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
61. McEwan R.W., Muller R.N. Dynamics, diversity, and resource gradient relationships in the herbaceous layer of an old-growth Appalachian forest. Plant Ecol. 2011, 212:1179-1191. 10.1007/s11258-011-9896-0.
62. Meesenburg H., Brumme R., Jacobsen C., Meiwes K.J., Eichhorn J. Soil properties. Ecol. Stud. 2009, vol. 208:33-47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. R. Brumme, P.K. Khanna (Eds.).
63. Mölder A., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Schmidt W. Forest ecosystem research in Hainich National Park (Thuringia): first results on flora and vegetation in stands with contrasting tree species diversity. Waldökol. onl. 2006, 3:83-99.
64. Mölder A., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Schmidt W. Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech?. For. Ecol. Manage. 2008, 256:272-281. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012.
65. Mölder A., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Leuschner C., Schmidt W. Zur Bedeutung der Winterlinde (Tilia cordata Mill.) in mittel- und nordwestdeutschen Eichen-Hainbuchen-Wäldern. Tuexenia 2009, 29:9-23.
66. Mölder A., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Schmidt W. Vielfältige Baumschicht - reichhaltige Verjüngung? Zur Naturverjüngung von artenreichen Laubwäldern im Nationalpark Hainich. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2009, 180:76-87.
67. Mölder I., Leuschner C., Leuschner H.H. δ13C signature of tree rings and radial increment of Fagus sylvatica trees as dependent on tree neighborhood and climate. Trees 2011, 25:215-229. 10.1007/s00468-010-0499-5.
68. Nadrowski K., Wirth C., Scherer-Lorenzen M. Is forest diversity driving ecosystem function and service?. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 2010, 2:75-79. 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003.
69. Neufeld H.S., Young D.R. Ecophysiology of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystems. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America 2003, 38-90. Oxford University Press, New York. F.S. Gilliam, M.R. Roberts (Eds.).
70. Paillet Y., Bergès L., Hjältén J., Odor P., Avon C., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Bijlsma R.-J., De Bruyn L., Fuhr M., Grandin U., Kanka R., Lundin L., Luque S., Magura T., Matesanz S., Mészáros I., Sebastià M.-T., Schmidt W., Standovár T., Tóthmérész B., Uotila A., Valladares F., Vellak K., Virtanen R. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:101-112.
71. Panferov O., Kreilein H., Meesenburg H., Eichhorn J., Gravenhorst G. Climatic condition at three beech forest sites in Central Germany. Ecol. Stud. 2009, vol. 208:13-32. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. R. Brumme, P.K. Khanna (Eds.).
72. Pautasso M., Aas G., Queloz V., Holdenrieder O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback - a conservation biology challenge. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 158:37-49. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.026.
73. Peterken G.F. Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
74. Pickett S.T.A. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. Long-Term Studies in Ecology 1989, 110-135. Springer, New York. G.E. Likens (Ed.).
75. Preutenborbeck J. Landnutzungswandel und Biodiversität - eine historisch-ökologische Analyse am Beispiel des Naturraumes Göttinger Wald, Dissertation 2009, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen.
76. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org.
77. Schmidt W. Herb layer species as indicators of biodiversity of managed and unmanaged beech forests. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 2005, 79:111-125.
78. Schmidt W. Vegetation. Ecol. Stud. 2009, vol. 208:65-86. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. R. Brumme, P.K. Khanna (Eds.).
79. Schmidt W., Streit M. Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Diversität der Baumschicht und der Bodenvegetation? - Untersuchungen in Buchen-Edellaubholz-Mischwäldern des Göttinger Waldes (Süd-Niedersachsen, Deutschland). Waldökol. Landsch.forsch. Natursch. 2009, 7:5-19.
80. Schmidt I., Leuschner C., Mölder A., Schmidt W. Structure and composition of the seed bank in monospecific and tree species-rich temperate broad-leaved forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257:695-702. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.052.
81. Schmidt M., Kriebitzsch W.-U., Ewald J. Waldartenlisten der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen, Moose und Flechten Deutschlands. BfN-Skripten 2011, 299:1-111.
82. Schulze I.-M., Bolte A., Schmidt W., Eichhorn J. Phytomass, litter and net primary production of herbaceous layer. Ecol. Stud. 2009, vol. 208:155-181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. R. Brumme, P.K. Khanna (Eds.).
83. Spiecker H., Hein S., Makkonen-Spiecker K., Thies M. Valuable Broadleaved Forests in Europe 2009, Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
84. ter Braak C.J.F., Prentice I.C. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1988, 18:271-317.
85. Vilà M., Inchausti P., Vayreda J., Barrantes O., Gracia C., Ibáñez J.J., Mata T. Confounding factors in the observational productivity-diversity relationship in forests. Ecol. Stud. 2005, vol. 176:65-86. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. M. Scherer-Lorenzen, C. Körner, E.-D. Schulze (Eds.).
86. Vockenhuber E.A., Scherber C., Langenbruch C., Meißner M., Seidel D., Tscharntke T. Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany's largest connected deciduous forest. Perspect. Plant. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 13:111-119. 10.1016/j.ppees.2011.02.004.
87. Wäldchen J., Schulze E.D., Mund M., Winkler B. Der Einfluss politischer, rechtlicher und wirtschaftlicher Rahmenbedingungen des 19. Jahrhunderts auf die Bewirtschaftung der Wälder im Hainich-Dün-Gebiet (Nordthüringen). Forstarchiv 2011, 82:35-47. 10.4432/0300-4112-82-35.
88. Welch W.J., Gutierrez L.G. Robust permutation tests for matched-pairs designs. J. Am. Stat. Assn. 1988, 83:450-455.
89. Wildmann S., Engel F., Meyer P., Spellmann H., Schultze J., Gärtner S., Reif A., Bauhus J. Wälder mit natürlicher Entwicklung in Deutschland - Definition und Flächen. AFZ/Wald 2014, 69:28-30.
90. Wisskirchen, R., Haeupler, H., 1998. Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
91. Wulf M. Preference of plant species for woodlands with differing habitat continuities. Flora 2003, 198:444-460. 10.1078/0367-2530-00118.
92. Yarie J. The role of understory vegetation in the nutrient cycle of forested ecosystems in the Mountain Hemlock Biogeoclimatic Zone. Ecology 1980, 61:1498-1514. 10.2307/1939057.