Disciplinary differences in twitter scholarly communication

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 567-582

  Holmberg, Kim ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL HUMANITIES; HISTORY OF SCIENCE; MICROBLOGGING; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION;

ASTROPHYSICS; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

RESEARCH;

EID: 84896888513     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ash, T.G. (2011). Tunisia's revolution isn't a product of Twitter or Wikileaks. But they do help. Guardian, January 19, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2011 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/19/tunisia-revolutiontwitter-facebook.
2. Borgman, C.L. (2000). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics revisited. In Cronin, B. & Atkins, H.B. (eds.) The web of knowledge - A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS, 2000.
3. Borgman, C. & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-72.
4. Boyd, D., Golder, S. & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2010. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://www.danah.org/papers/TweetTweetRetweet.pdf.
5. Cole, J.R. (2000). A short history of the use of citations as a measure of the impact of scientific and scholarly work. In Cronin, B. & Atkins, H.B. (eds.) The web of knowledge - A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS, 2000.
6. Choi, S., Park, J. & Park, H.W. (2012). Using social media data to explore communication processes within South Korean online innovation communities. Scientometrics, vol. 90, pp. 43-56.
7. Earle, P.S., Bowden, D.C. & Guy, M. (2011). Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world. Annals of Geophysics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 708-715.
8. Ediger, D., Jiang, K., Riedy, J., Bader, D.A., Corley, C., Farber, R. & Reynolds, W.N. (2010). Massive social network analysis: Mining Twitter for social good. In Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~jriedy/papercopies/ICPP10-GraphCT.pdf.
9. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley. ISBN 0-471-26370-2.
10. Forkosh-Baruch, A. & Hershkovitz, A. (2011). A case study of Israeli highereducation institutes sharing scholarly information with the community via social networks. Internet and Higher Education, vol. 15, pp. 58-68.
11. Gruzd, A., Staves, K. & Wilk, A. (2011). Tenure and promotion in the age of online social media. In Proceedings of the ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 9.-12.10.2011, New Orleans, USA.
12. Harlow, S. & Johnson, T.J. (2011). Overthrowing the protest paradigm? How the New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian revolution. International Journal of Communication, vol. 5, pp. 1359-1374.
13. Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S.C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved March 29, 2011 from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/honeycutt.herring.2009.pdf.
14. Hong, S. & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 455-461.
15. Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M. & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, vol. 14, no. 1-5, January 2009. Retrieved June 2, 2011 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2317/2063.
16. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2169-2188.
17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, vol. 33, pp. 159-74.
18. Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J. & Decker, S. (2010) Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, April 26-27, 2010, Raleigh, NC: US. Retrieve January 11, 2013 from http://journal.webscience.org/314/.
19. Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, vol. 159, no. 3810, pp. 56-63.
20. Moed, H.F., De Bruin, R.E. & Van Leeuwen, T.N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance - database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 381-422.
21. Priem, J., & Costello, K. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
22. Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7-5).
23. Ross, C., Terras, M., Warwick, C. & Welsh, A. (2010). Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists. Journal of Documentation, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 214-237.
24. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N. & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 183-195.
25. Scanfeld, D., Scanfeld, M. & Larson, E.L. (2010). Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics. American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 182-188.
26. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. & Chi, E.H. (2010). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, 2010. Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://web.mac.com/peter.pirolli/Professional/About_Me_files/2010-04-15-retweetability-v18-final.pdf.
27. Weller, K., Dröge, E., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation Analysis in Twitter: Approaches for Defining and Measuring Information Flows within Tweets during Scientific Conferences. In M. Rowe, M. Stankovic, A.-S. Dadzie, & M. Hardey (Eds.), Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011), Workshop at Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2011), Crete, Greece (pp. 1-12). CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 718. Retrieved January 17, 2013 from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-718/paper_04.pdf
28. Weller, K., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Twitter for Scientific Communication: How Can Citations/References be Identified and Measured? In Proceedings of the Poster Session at the Web Science Conference 2011 (WebSci11), Koblenz, Germany. Retrieved January 17, 2013 from http://journal.webscience.org/500/1/153_paper.pdf.
29. Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar. How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic, UK.