Changing policy and practice: Making sense of national guidelines forosteoarthritis

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 106, Issue , 2014, Pages 101-109

  Ong, Bie Nio ^a   Morden, Andrew ^a   Brooks, Lauren ^a   Porcheret, Mark ^a   Edwards, John J ^a   Sanders, Tom ^a   Jinks, Clare ^a   Dziedzic, Krysia ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical guidelines; Complex interventions; England; Normalisation Process Theory; Osteoarthritis; Primary care; Sense making

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; GUIDELINE; HEALTH POLICY; MEDICINE; PLANNING PRACTICE; POLICY APPROACH; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSULTATION; EXPERT SYSTEM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOLISTIC CARE; HOLISTIC NURSING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING PRACTICE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL GUIDELINES; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; ENGLAND; NORMALISATION PROCESS THEORY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIMARY CARE; SENSE-MAKING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENGLAND; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84896886378     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bamford C., Heaven B., May C., Moynihan P. Implementing nutrition guidelines for older people in residential care homes: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science 2012, 7(106).
2. Crilly T., Jashapara A., Ferlie E. Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: A scoping review of the literature 2010, 08/1801/220, NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme.
3. Currie G., Dingwall R., Kitchener M., Warin G.J. Let's dance: organization studies, medical sociology and health policy. Social Science & Medicine 2012, 74:273-280.
4. Currie G., Waring J., Finn R. The limits of knowledge management for UK public services modernization: the case of patient safety and service quality. Public Administration 2007, 86(2):363-385.
5. Dixon-Woods M., Yeung K., Bosk C.L. Why is U.K. medicine no longer a self-regulating profession? The role of scandals involving "bad apple" doctors. Social Science & Medicine 2011, 73(10):1452-1459.
6. The new public management in action 1996, Oxford University Press. E. Ferlie, A. Pettigrew, L. Ashburner, L. Fitzgerald (Eds.).
7. Freidson E. Changing nature of professional control. Annual Review of Sociology 1984, 10:1-20.
8. Gkeredakis E., Swan J., Powell J., Nicolini D., Scarbrough H., Roginski C., Taylor-Phillips S., Clarke A. Mind the gap. Understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. Journal of Health Organisation and Management 2011, 25(3):298-314.
9. Glasziou P., Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. ACP Journal Club 2005, 142(2):A-8-A-10.
10. Green J., Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research 2004, Sage, London.
11. Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Bate P., Kyriakidou O., Macfarlane F., Peacock R. How to Spread Good Ideas. A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation 2004, NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, London.
12. Ham C. Health policy in Britain 2009, Palgrave, London.
13. Hartley H. The system of alignments challenging physician professional dominance: an elaborated theory of countervailing powers. Sociology of Health and Illness 2002, 24(2):178-207.
14. Howe A. Response to the Department of Health consultation on equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS 2010, Royal College of General Practitioners, London.
15. Iles V. Why reforming the NHS doesn't work: The importance of understanding how good people offer bad care 2011, Reallylearning, London.
16. Jordan K., Kadam U., Hayward R., Porcheret M., Young C., Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010, 11:144.
17. Kennedy A., Chew-Graham C., Blakeman T., Bowen T., Gardner C., Protheore J., et al. Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation. Implementation Science 2010, 5(7).
18. Kitchener M., Mertz E. Professional projects and institutional change inhealthcare: the case of American dentistry. Social Science & Medicine 2012, 74:372-380.
19. Macfarlane A., O'reilly-De Brun M. Using a theory-driven conceptual framework in qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research 2012, 22(5):607-618.
20. May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science 2013, 8:18.
21. May C.R., Finch T. Implementation, embedding and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology 2009, 43(3):535-554.
22. May C., Finch T., Mair F., Ballini L., Dowrick C., Eccles M., et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research 2007, 7:148.
23. May C.R., Mair F., Finch T., Macfarlane A., Dowrick C., Treweek S., et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implementation Science: IS 2009, 4:29.
24. Mcnulty T. Reengineering as knowledge management. Management Learning 2002, 33(4):439-458.
25. Medical Research Council Developing and evaluating complex interventions. New guidance 2008, Medical Research Council, London.
26. Michie S., Van Stralen M.M., West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science: IS 2011, 6:42.
27. Muzio D., Kirkpatrick I. Introduction: professions and organizations - a conceptual framework. Current Sociology 2011, 59(4):384-405.
28. Nancarrow S.A., Borthwick M. Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociology of Health and Illness 2005, 27:897-919.
29. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Osteoarthritis. The care and management of osteoarthritis in adults 2008, NHS NICE, London.
30. Parent R., Roy M., St-Jacques D. Asystems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management 2007, 11(6):81-93.
31. Pettigrew A., Ferlie E., Mckee L. Shaping strategic change. Making change in large organisations: The case of the NHS 1992, Sage, London.
32. Porcheret M., Jordan K., Jinks C., Croft P., with the Primary Care Rheumatology Society Primary care treatment of knee pain a survey in older adults. Rheumatology 2007, 46:1694-1700.
33. Sanders T., Foster N.E., Ong B.N. Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study. BMC Medicine 2011, 9:49.
34. Swan J., Bresnen M., Newell S., Robertson M. The object of knowledge: the role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations 2007, 60(12):1809-1837.
35. Waring J., Dixon-Woods M., Yeung K. Modernising medical regulation: where are we now?. Journal of Health Organisation and Management 2010, 24(6):540-555.