Measuring the academic impact of researchers by combined citation and collaboration impact

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 1177-1187

  Ding, Jielan ^a   Yang, Liying ^a   Liu, Qing ^a  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER PATHS; CITATION IMPACT; CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; TWO-DIMENSION;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84896866615     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979-980.
2. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102 (46): 16569-16572.
3. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and Practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1): 131-152.
4. Jin, B. H.; Liang, L. M. &Rousseau, R. (2007). The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 52(6): 855-863.
5. Moed, H. F. (2011). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 4(3): 265-277.
6. Leydesdorff, L. &Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated Impact Indicators Compared With Impact Factors: An Alternative Research Design With Policy Implications. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 62(11): 2133-2146.
7. Rousseau, R. (2012). Basic Properties of Both Percentile Rank Scores and the I3 Indicator. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 63(2): 416-420.
8. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A. & Chute, R. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e6022.
9. Levitt, M. J., Thelwall, M., & Levitt, M. (2011). To what extent does the citation advantage of collaboration depend on the citation counting systems? In: (E. Noyons, P. Ngulube & J. Leta, Eds.) Proceedings of ISSI 2011-13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 398-408. Durban: ISSI, Leiden University and University of Zululand.
10. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). "Betweenness Centrality" as an Indicator of the "Interdisciplinarity" of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.
11. Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1462-1480.
12. Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.
13. Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 98(2), 404-409.
14. Rodriguez, M. A. & Pepe, A. (2008). On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 195-201.
15. Yan, E. J. & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 10, 2107-2018.