Comparison of in vitro and in vivo bioactivity: Cuttlefish-bone-derived hydroxyapatite and synthetic hydroxyapatite granules as a bone graft substitute

Biomedical Materials (Bristol)

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Kim, Beom Su ^a,b   Kang, Hyo Jin ^b   Yang, Sun Sik ^a   Lee, Jun ^a  

^a Wonkwang University   (South Korea)

^b Bonecell Biotech Inc   (South Korea)

Author keywords

bone graft substitute; cuttlefish bone; hydrothermal reaction; hydroxyapatite

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); GRANULATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOLLUSCS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHELLFISH; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

BONE DEFECT HEALING; BONE GRAFT MATERIALS; BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES; CUTTLEFISH BONES; HYDROTHERMAL REACTION; HYDROXYAPATITE (HAP); OSTEOCONDUCTIVE PROPERTIES; SYNTHETIC HYDROXYAPATITE;

BONE;

CUTTLEFISH BONE DERIVED HYDROXYAPATITE; HYDROXYAPATITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BONE GRAFT; BONE MASS; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL VIABILITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DNA CONTENT; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; FRACTURE HEALING; HISTOLOGY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NECROSIS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DECAPODIFORMES; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; RABBITS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84896852919     PISSN: 17486041     EISSN: 1748605X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/2/025004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Goulet J A, Senunas L E, DeSilva G L and Greenfield M L 1997 Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 339 76-81
2. Heise U, Osborn J F and Duwe F 1990 Hydroxyapatite ceramics as a bone substitute Int. Orthop. 14 329-38
3. Ackley M A and Monroe E 1980 Alumina as a filler for bone cement: a feasibility study Biomaterials 1 217-21
4. Stanic V et al 2002 Osteointegration of bioactive glass-coated zirconia in healthy bone: an in vivo evaluation Biomaterials 23 3833-41
5. Holmes R E, Bucholz R W and Mooney V 1987 Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in diaphyseal defects: a histometric study J. Orthop. Res. 5 114-21
6. Pilliar R M, Filiaggi M J, Wells J D, Grynpas M D and Kandel R A 2001 Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications - in vitro characterization Biomaterials 22 963-72
7. Chang B S, Lee C K, Hong K S, Youn H J, Ryu H S, Chung S S and Park K W 2000 Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations Biomaterials 21 1291-8
8. Boyde A, Corsi A, Quarto R, Cancedda R and Bianco P 1999 Osteoconduction in large macroporous hydroxyapatite ceramic implants: evidence for a complementary integration and disintegration mechanism Bone 24 579-89
9. Weissenboeck M, Stein E, Undt G, Ewers R, Lauer G and Turhani D 2006 Particle size of hydroxyapatite granules calcified from red algae affects the osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro Cells Tissues Organs 182 79-88
10. Park J W, Bae S R, Suh J Y, Lee D H, Kim S H, Kim H and Lee C S 2008 Evaluation of bone healing with eggshell-derived bone graft substitutes in rat calvaria: a pilot study J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87 203-14
11. Tran C T, Gargiulo C, Thao H D, Tuan H M, Filgueira L and Michael Strong D 2011 Culture and differentiation of osteoblasts on coral scaffold from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Cell Tissue Bank 12 247-61
12. Roy D M and Linnehan S K 1974 Hydroxyapatite formed from coral skeletal carbonate by hydrothermal exchange Nature 247 220-2
13. Manoli F and Dalas E 2000 Calcium carbonate crystallization on xiphoid of the cuttlefish J. Cryst. Growth 217 422-8
14. Birchall J D and Thomas N L 1983 On the architecture and function of cuttlefish bone J. Mater. Sci. 18 2081-6
15. Ivankovic H, Gallego Ferrer G, Tkalcec E, Orlic S and Ivankovic M 2009 Preparation of highly porous hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone J. Mater. Sci., Mater. Med. 20 1039-46
16. Rocha J H, Lemos A F, Agathopoulos S, Kannan S, Valerio P and Ferreira J M 2006 Hydrothermal growth of hydroxyapatite scaffolds from aragonitic cuttlefish bones J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 77 160-8
17. Kim B S, Kim J S, Sung H M, You H K and Lee J 2012 Cellular attachment and osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on natural cuttlefish bone J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100 1673-9
18. Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J and Ning C 2008 Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics Biomaterials 29 2588-96
19. Ivankovic H, Tkalcec E, Orlic S, Ferrer G G and Schauperl Z 2010 Hydroxyapatite formation from cuttlefish bones: kinetics J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21 2711-22
20. Ingber D E, Prusty D, Sun Z, Betensky H and Wang N 1995 Cell shape, cytoskeletal mechanics, and cell cycle control in angiogenesis J. Biomech. 28 1471-84
21. Jun I K, Koh Y H, Lee S H and Kim H E 2007 Novel hydroxyapatite (HA) dual-scaffold with ultra-high porosity, high surface area, and compressive strength J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18 1071-7
22. Liu H, Slamovich E B and Webster T J 2006 Increased osteoblast functions among nanophase titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composites of the highest nanometer surface roughness J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 78 798-807
23. Xu C, Yang F, Wang S and Ramakrishna S 2004 In vitro study of human vascular endothelial cell function on materials with various surface roughness J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 71 154-61
24. de Bruijn J D, van Blitterswijk C A and Davies J E 1995 Initial bone matrix formation at the hydroxyapatite interface in vivo J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29 89-99
25. Park J W, Kim Y J, Jang J H and Song H 2010 Osteoblast response to magnesium ion-incorporated nanoporous titanium oxide surfaces Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21 1278-87
26. Zreiqat H, Howlett C R, Zannettino A, Evans P, Schulze-Tanzil G, Knabe C and Shakibaei M 2002 Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 62 175-84
27. Gerstenfeld L C, Chipman S D, Glowacki J and Lian J B 1987 Expression of differentiated function by mineralizing cultures of chicken osteoblasts Dev. Biol. 122 49-60
28. Li Z, Zhou Z, Yellowley C E and Donahue H J 1999 Inhibiting gap junctional intercellular communication alters expression of differentiation markers in osteoblastic cells Bone 25 661-6
29. Miramand P, Bustamante P, Bentley D and Koueta N 2006 Variation of heavy metal concentrations (Ag, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, V, and Zn) during the life cycle of the common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis Sci. Total Environ. 361 132-43
30. Mourino V, Cattalini J P and Boccaccini A R 2012 Metallic ions as therapeutic agents in tissue engineering scaffolds: an overview of their biological applications and strategies for new developments J. R. Soc. Interface 9 401-19
31. Garcia-Enriquez S, Guadarrama H E, Reyes-Gonzalez I, Mendizabal E, Jasso-Gastinel C F, Garcia-Enriquez B, Rembao-Bojorquez D and Pane-Pianese C 2010 Mechanical performance and in vivo tests of an acrylic bone cement filled with bioactive Sepia officinalis cuttlebone J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 21 113-25
32. Ghanaati S et al 2010 Influence of beta-tricalcium phosphate granule size and morphology on tissue reaction in vivo Acta Biomater. 6 4476-87
33. Shirakata Y, Oda S, Kinoshita A, Kikuchi S, Tsuchioka H and Ishikawa I 2002 Histocompatible healing of periodontal defects after application of an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement. A preliminary study in dogs J. Periodontol. 73 1043-53