Immobilization of arsenate in a sandy loam soil using starch-stabilized magnetite nanoparticles

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 271, Issue , 2014, Pages 16-23

  Liang, Qiqi ^a   Zhao, Dongye ^a,b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Arsenic; Groundwater remediation; Magnetite; Metal immobilization; Nanoparticle; Soil remediation; Starch stabilization

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTION COEFFICIENT; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; INJECTION FLOW RATE; METAL IMMOBILIZATION; NANOPARTICLE SUSPENSION; NATURAL GROUNDWATER; SOIL REMEDIATION; TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURES;

ARSENIC; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MAGNETITE; NANOPARTICLES; SOIL CONDITIONERS; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; STABILIZATION; STARCH; WATER TREATMENT;

MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES;

ARSENIC ACID; GROUND WATER; IRON; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; STARCH; WATER; ARSENIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTANT;

ARSENATE; GROUNDWATER FLOW; IMMOBILIZATION; MAGNETITE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SANDY LOAM; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION; SORPTION; STABILIZATION; STARCH;

ARTICLE; FLOW RATE; IMMOBILIZATION; LEACHING; SANDY LOAM; ADSORPTION; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; PROCEDURES; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTANT;

ADSORPTION; ARSENATES; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; STARCH; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84896840202     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.055     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berg M., Tran H.C., Nguyen T.C., Pham H.V., Schertenleib R., Giger W. Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: a human health threat. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:2621-2626.
2. Welch A.H., Westjohn D.B., Helsel D.R., Wanty R.B. Arsenic in ground water of the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water 2000, 38:589-604.
3. deLemos J.L., Bostick B.C., Renshaw C.E., Sturup S., Feng X.H. Landfill-stimulated iron reduction and arsenic release at the Coakley Superfund Site (NH). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:67-73.
4. Kapaj S., Peterson H., Liber K., Bhattacharya P. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning - a review. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A 2006, 41:2399-2428.
5. Abernathy C.O., Liu Y.P., Longfellow D., Aposhian H.V., Beck B., Fowler B., Goyer R., Menzer R., Rossman T., Thompson C., Waalkes M. Arsenic: health effects, mechanisms of actions, and research issues. Environ. Health Persp. 1999, 107:593-597.
6. Dixit S., Hering J.G. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:4182-4189.
7. Smedley P.L., Kinniburgh D.G. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17:517-568.
8. Masscheleyn P.H., Delaune R.D., Patrick W.H. Effect of reodx potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25:1414-1419.
9. Deuel L.E., Swoboda A.R. Arsenic solubility in a reduced environment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1972, 36:276-278.
10. Yean S., Cong L., Yavuz C.T., Mayo J.T., Yu W.W., Kan A.T., Colvin V.L., Tomson M.B. Effect of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate. J. Mater. Res. 2005, 20:3255-3264.
11. Gimenez J., Martinez M., de Pablo J., Rovira M., Duro L. Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 141:575-580.
12. Jang M., Min S.H., Kim T.H., Park J.K. Removal of arsenite and arsenate using hydrous ferric oxide incorporated into naturally occurring porous diatomite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:1636-1643.
13. Raven K.P., Jain A., Loeppert R.H. Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32:344-349.
14. 4 nanocrystals. Science 2006, 314:964-967.
15. Guo X.J., Du Y.H., Chen F.H., Park H.S., Xie Y.N. Mechanism of removal of arsenic by bead cellulose loaded with iron oxyhydroxide (beta-FeOOH): EXAFS study. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2007, 314:427-433.
16. Manning B.A., Hunt M.L., Amrhein C., Yarmoff J.A. Arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) reactions with zerovalent iron corrosion products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:5455-5461.
17. Kanel S.R., Manning B., Charlet L., Choi H. Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:1291-1298.
18. An B., Liang Q.Q., Zhao D.Y. Removal of arsenic(V) from spent ion exchange brine using a new class of starch-bridged magnetite nanoparticles. Water Res. 2011, 45:1961-1972.
19. Su C.M., Puls R.W. In situ remediation of arsenic in simulated groundwater using zerovalent iron: laboratory column tests on combined effects of phosphate and silicate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:2582-2587.
20. He F., Zhao D.Y., Liu J.C., Roberts C.B. Stabilization of Fe-Pd nanoparticles with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose for enhanced transport and dechlorination of trichloroethylene in soil and groundwater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:29-34.
21. Hristovski K., Baumgardner A., Westerhoff P. Selecting metal oxide nanomaterials for arsenic removal in fixed bed columns: from nanopowders to aggregated nanoparticle media. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147:265-274.
22. Shipley H.J., Yean S., Kan A.T., Tomson M.B. Adsorption of arsenic to magnetite nanoparticles: effect of particle concentration, pH, ionic strength, and temperature. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28:509-515.
23. Liang Q.Q., Zhao D.Y., Qian T.W., Freeland K., Feng Y.C. Effects of stabilizers and water chemistry on arsenate sorption by polysaccharide-stabilized magnetite nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:2407-2418.
24. Xiong Z., He F., Zhao D.Y., Barnett M.O. Immobilization of mercury in sediment using stabilized iron sulfide nanoparticles. Water Res. 2009, 43:5171-5179.
25. Xu Y.H., Zhao D.Y. Reductive immobilization of chromate in water and soil using stabilized iron nanoparticles. Water Res. 2007, 41:2101-2108.
26. Shipley H.J., Engates K.E., Guettner A.M. Study of iron oxide nanoparticles in soil for remediation of arsenic. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13:2387-2397.
27. Kanel S.R., Nepal D., Manning B., Choi H. Transport of surface-modified iron nanoparticle in porous media and application to arsenic(III) remediation. J. Nanopart. Res. 2007, 9:725-735.
28. Gee G.W., Or D. Particle-size analysis: pipette method. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 4): Physical Methods 2002, 272-278. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. J.H. Dane, G.C. Topp (Eds.).
29. Marcano-Martinez E., McBride M.B. Comparison of the titration and ion adsorption methods for surface charge measurement in oxisols. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1989, 53:1040-1045.
30. Yang J.K., Barnett M.O., Jardine P.M., Basta N.T., Casteel S.W. Adsorption, sequestration, and bioaccessibility of As(V) in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:4562-4569.
31. USEPA Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils, Method 3050B. Wastes - Hazardous Waste - Test Methods 1996, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
32. USEPA, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, Method 1311, Washington, DC, 1992.
33. Allison J.D., Allison T.L. Partition coefficients for metals in surface water, soil, and waste. EPA/600/R-05/074 2005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
34. - release stoichiometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33:1179-1184.
35. Ghosh A., Mukiibi M., Ela W. TCLP underestimates leaching of arsenic from solid residuals under landfill conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:4677-4682.
36. Kretzschmar R., Borkovec M., Grolimund D., Elimelech M. Mobile subsurface colloids and their role in contaminant transport. Adv. Agron. 1999, 66:121-193.
37. He F., Zhang M., Qian T.W., Zhao D.Y. Transport of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles in porous media: column experiments and modeling. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2009, 334:96-102.
38. Feinstein D.T., Guo W.X. STANMOD: a suite of Windows-based programs for evaluating solute transport. Ground Water 2004, 42:482-487.
39. Tufenkji N., Elimelech M. Deviation from the classical colloid filtration theory in the presence of repulsive DLVO interactions. Langmuir 2004, 20:10818-10828.
40. Chen J.Y., Ko C.H., Bhattacharjee S., Elimelech M. Role of spatial distribution of porous medium surface charge heterogeneity in colloid transport. Colloid Surf. A 2001, 191:3-15.
41. Liu X.Y., Wazne M., Christodoulatos C., Jasinkiewicz K.L. Aggregation and deposition behavior of boron nanoparticles in porous media. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 330:90-96.
42. Adler J.J., Rabinovich Y.I., Moudgil B.M. Origins of the non-DLVO force between glass surfaces in aqueous solution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 237:249-258.
43. Wenzel W.W., Kirchbaumer N., Prohaska T., Stingeder G., Lombi E., Adriano D.C. Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 436:309-323.
44. An B., Steinwinder T.R., Zhao D.Y. Selective removal of arsenate from drinking water using a polymeric ligand exchanger. Water Res. 2005, 39:4993-5004.
45. Lecoanet H.F., Wiesner M.R. Velocity effects on fullerene and oxide nanoparticle deposition in porous media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:4377-4382.
46. Alley W.M., Reilly T.E., Franke O.L. Sustainability of Ground-Water Resources (U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186) 1999, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado.