Editorial: Do you see what i see?: Quality, reliability, and reproducibility in biomedical research

Molecular Endocrinology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 277-280

  Lee Kraus, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA POLYMERASE;

CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONFIRMATION BIAS; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; ENDOCRINE SYSTEM; ENDOCRINOLOGIST; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENE CONTROL; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NATURAL SCIENCE; PEER REVIEW; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIST; SOCIOLOGY; STUDY DESIGN; TRAINING; TRUST;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84896834024     PISSN: 08888809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1210/me.2014-1036     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge, London. 1963: 216.
2. Alberts B. Written Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Research, U. S. House of Representatives Hearing on "Scientific Integrity and Transparency. " March 5, 2013.
3. Swanson E. Americans have little faith in scientists, science journalists: poll. HuffingtonPost. December 23, 2013. http: //www. huffingtonpost. com/2013/12/21/faith-in-scientists_n_4481487. html.
4. Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012; 483: 531-533.
5. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011; 10: 712.
6. Singer N. Duke suspends researcher and halts cancer studies. New York Times. July 20, 2010: http: //prescriptions. blogs. nytimes. com/2010/07/20/ duke-suspends-researcher-halts-cancer-studies/?_php_true&_ type_blogs&_r_0.
7. Anonymous. Misconduct in science: an array of errors. The Economist. September 10, 2011.
8. Anonymous. Howscience goes wrong. The Economist. October 19, 2013: 13.
9. Anonymous. Trouble at the lab. The Economist. October 19, 2013: 26-30.
10. Sagan C. Broca's Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York, NY: Random House; 1979: 62.
11. Kirschner M. A perverted view of "impact. " Science. 2013; 340: 1265.
12. Zoghbi HY. The basics of translation. Science. 2013; 339: 250.