Effect of Chiranjeevi Yojana on institutional deliveries and neonatal and maternal outcomes in Gujarat, India: A difference-in-differences analysis;Effets du programme Chiranjeevi Yojana sur les accouchements en institutions et les résultats néonatals et maternels au Gujarat, en Inde: Une analyse de l'écart des différences

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 187-194

  Mohanan, Manoj ^a   Bauhoff, Sebastian ^b   La Forgia, Gerard ^c   Babiarz, Kimberly Singer ^d   Singh, Kultar ^e   Miller, Grant ^d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c WORLD BANK   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Sambodhi Research and Communications   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDIA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATERNAL WELFARE; NEWBORN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; POVERTY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INDIA; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PUBLIC-PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896830316     PISSN: 00429686     EISSN: 15640604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.13.124644     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hill K, Thomas K, AbouZahr C, Walker N, Say L, Inoue M et al.; Maternal Mortality Working Group. Estimates of maternal mortality worldwide between 1990 and 2005: an assessment of available data. Lancet 2007;370:1311-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61572-4 PMID:17933645
2. Hyder AA, Wali SA, McGuckin J. The burden of disease from neonatal mortality: a review of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG 2003;110:894-901. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02446.x PMID:14550358
3. Pitt C, Greco G, Powell-Jackson T, Mills A. Countdown to 2015: assessment of official development assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health, 2003-08. Lancet 2010;376:1485-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61302-5 PMID:20850869
4. Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J et al. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet 2010;375:2032-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60678-2 PMID:20569843
5. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ; Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet 2006;368:1284-99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1 PMID:17027735
6. Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, James SL, Hogan MC, Gakidou E. India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet 2010;375:2009-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1 PMID:20569841
7. Mazumdar S, Mills A, Powell-Jackson T. Financial incentives in health: new evidence from India's Janani Suraksha Yojana. Oxford: Health Economics Research Centre; 2011. Available from: http://www.herc.ox.ac.uk/people/tpowelljackson/financial%20incentives%20in%20health [accessed 7 November 2013].
8. Singh A, Mavalankar DV, Bhat R, Desai A, Patel SR, Singh PV et al. Providing skilled birth attendants and emergency obstetric care to the poor through partnership with private sector obstetricians in Gujarat, India. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:960-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.060228 PMID:20454488
9. Mavalankar D, Singh A, Patel SR, Desai A, Singh PV. Saving mothers and newborns through an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi scheme of Gujarat, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;107:271-6.
10. Acharya A, McNamee P. Assessing Gujarat's 'Chiranjeevi' scheme. Econ Polit Wkly 2009;44:13-5.
11. Krupp K, Madhivanan P. Leveraging human capital to reduce maternal mortality in India: enhanced public health system or public-private partnership? Hum Resour Health 2009;7:18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-7-18 PMID:19250542
12. Bhat R, Mavalankar DV, Singh PV, Singh N. Maternal healthcare financing: Gujarat's Chiranjeevi scheme and its beneficiaries. J Health Popul Nutr 2009;27:249-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v27i2.3367 PMID:19489419
13. Ramesh M. Innovation award for Gujarat. The Hindu Business Line. 6 November 2006. Available from: http://www.thehindubusinessline.in/bline/2006/11/06/stories/2006110600801500.htm [accessed 7 November 2013].
14. Outcome of Chiranjeevi scheme. Gandhinagar: Gujarat Government Department of Health and Family Welfare; 2013.
15. Health statistics, Gujarat 2009-2010. Gandhinagar: Gujarat Government Vital Statistics Division; 2011. Available from: http://www.gujhealth.gov.in/images/pdf/Health-review-09-10.pdf [accessed 7 November 2003].
16. Sundaram K. On identification of households below the poverty line in the BPL Census 2002: some comments on the proposed methodology. Econ Polit Wkly 2003;38:896-901.
17. Jinyong H, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W. Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 2001;69:201-9.
18. Filmer D, Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data-or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 2001;38:115-32.
19. Neyman J, Scott EL. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 1948;16:1-32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914288
20. Das J, Hammer J, Sánchez-Paramo C. The impact of recall periods on reported morbidity and health seeking behavior. J Dev Econ 2012;98:76-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.07.001
21. Krishna A, Ananthpur K. Globalization, distance and disease: spatial health disparities in rural India. Millennial Asia 2013;4:3-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.10.1177/0976399613480879
22. Chiranjeevi scheme failed to deliver: CAG report. Indian Express. 31 March 2011. Available from: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/chiranjeevi-scheme-failed-to-deliver-cag-report/769645/ [accessed 7 November 2013].
23. Govt scheme to arrest infant mortality fails to deliver. Times of India. 31 March 2011. Available from: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-03-31/ahmedabad/29365735_1_mortality-rate-infant-mortality-govt-scheme [accessed 7 November 2013].