Revisiting surrogate consent for ventricular assist device placement

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 747-749

  Bruce, Courtenay R ^a,b   Bhimaraj, Arvind ^b,c   Smith, Martin L ^d  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CASE REPORT; CONTINUOUS HEMODIALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DRUG MEGADOSE; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY; KIDNEY FAILURE; LIVING WILL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESPIRATORY TRACT INTUBATION; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;

HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;

EID: 84896821101     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.039     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. T.M. Pope Legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making Chest 141 2012 1074 1081
2. L.A. Allen, L.W. Stevenson, and K.L. Grady et al. Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 125 2012 1928 1952
3. D.M. Dudzinski Ethics guidelines for destination therapy Ann Thorac Surg 81 2006 1185 1188
4. A.G. Rizzieri, J.L. Verheijde, M.Y. Rady, and J.L. McGregor Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as destination therapy Philos Ethics Humanit Med 3 2008 20 35
5. J.K. Kirklin, D.C. Naftel, and R.L. Kormos et al. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients J Heart Lung Transplant 32 2013 141 156
6. J.W. Entwistle, R.M. Sade, and R.J. Petrucci The ethics of mechanical support: the need for new guidelines Ann Thorac Surg 92 2011 1939 1942
7. D.I. Shalowitz, E. Garrett-Mayer, and D. Wendler The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review Arch Intern Med 166 2006 493 497
8. D.P. Sulmasy, K. Haller, and P.B. Terry More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments Am J Med 96 1994 432 438
9. R.J. Petrucci, L.A. Benish, and B.L. Carrow et al. Ethical considerations for ventricular assist device support: a 10-point model ASAIO J 57 2011 268 273
10. L.B. McCullough, J.W. Jones, and B.A. Brody Informed consent L.B. McCullough, J.W. Jones, B.A. Brody, Surgical ethics 1998 Oxford University Press New York 15 36
11. C.R. Bruce, M.L. Smith, and L.B. McCullough Clarification of the intent of ventricular assist devices before patient consent J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145 2013 1423 1425
12. P.S. Mueller, K.M. Swetz, and M.R. Freeman et al. Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support Mayo Clin Proc 85 2010 791 797
13. Medicare Final Rule. Conditions of participation: human resources. 42 C.F.R. §482.98(d); 2007.
14. T.E. Quill, and R. Holloway Time-limited trials near the end of life JAMA 306 2011 1483 1484
15. Coulter A, Kryworuchko J, Mullen P, et al. 2012 updated chapter A: using a systematic development process, 2012. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration; Available at: http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS- Chapter-A.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2013.
16. D. Stacey, C.L. Bennett, and M.J. Barry et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 CD001431