A Fuzzy-based Methodology for an Aggregative Environmental Risk Assessment of Restored Soil

Pedosphere

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 220-231

  Wang, Shi Zhong ^a   Zhao, Zhi Hao ^a   Xia, Bing ^a   Qiu, Hao ^a   Morel, J L ^b   Qiu, Rong Liang ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b LABORATOIRE SOLS ET ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Fuzzy set theory; Heavy metals; Remediated; Risk assessment; Weight distribution

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; GROWTH RATE; HEAVY METAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH WORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SOIL AMENDMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84896818750     PISSN: 10020160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60008-4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adriaenssens V., De Baets B., Goethals P.L.M., De Pauw N. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 319:1-12.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard guide for risk-based corrective action. E2081-00 2000, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
3. Ball D.F. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareous soils. J. Soil Sci. 1964, 15:84-92.
4. Barona A., Aranguiz I., Elías A. Metal associations in soils before and after EDTA extractive decontamination: implications for the effectiveness of further cleanup procedures. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 113:79-85.
5. Bettinelli M., Beone G.M., Spezia S., Baffi C. Determination of heavy metals in soils and sediments by microwave-assisted digestion and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2000, 424:289-296.
6. Blake G.R., Hartage K.H. Bulk density. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Agronomy series 1986, 363-375. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. A. Klute (Ed.).
7. Davidson C.M., Duncan A.L., Littlejohn D., Ure A.M., Garden L.M. A critical evaluation of the three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure to assess the potential mobility and toxicity of heavy metals in industrially-contaminated land. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1998, 363:45-55.
8. Di Palma L., Ferrantelli P. Copper leaching from a sandy soil: Mechanism and parameters affecting EDTA extraction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 122:85-90.
9. Fairbrother A., Wenstel R., Sappington K., Wood W. Framework for metals risk assessment. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2007, 68:145-227.
10. Fryer M., Collins C.D., Ferrier H., Colvile R.N., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Human exposure modelling for chemical risk assessment: a review of current approaches and research and policy implications. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2006, 9:261-274.
11. Genske D.D., Heinrich K. A knowledge-based fuzzy expert system to analyse degraded terrain. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:2459-2472.
12. Gérard E., Echevarria G., Sterckeman T., Morel J.L. Cadmium availability to three plant species varying in cadmium accumulation pattern. J. Environ. Qual. 2000, 29:1117-1123.
13. Kaufmann M., Tobias S., Schulin R. Quality evaluation of restored soils with a fuzzy logic expert system. Geoderma. 2009, 151:290-302.
14. Lee H.-M. Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 1996, 79:323-336.
15. Lee S.W., Kim J.Y., Lee J.U., Ko I., Kim K.W. Removal of arsenic in tailings by soil flushing and the remediation process monitoring. Environ. Geochem. Hlth. 2004, 26:403-409.
16. Li W.X., Zhang X.X., Wu B., Sun S.L., Chen Y.S., Pan W.Y., Zhao D.Y., Cheng S.P. A comparative analysis of environmental quality assessment methods for heavy metal-contaminated soils. Pedosphere. 2008, 18:344-352.
17. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) Identification Standards for Hazardous Wastes-Identification for Extraction Toxicity (in Chinese). GB 5085.3-2007 2009, China Standards Press, Beijing.
18. Neilson J.W., Artiola J.F., Maier R.M. Characterization of lead removal from contaminated soils by nontoxic soil-washing agents. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:899-908.
19. Oomen A.G., Rompelberg C.J.M., Bruil M.A., Dobbe C.J.G., Pereboom D.P.K.H., Sips A.J.A.M. Development of an in vitro digestion model for estimating the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Arch. Environ. Con. Tox. 2003, 44:281-287.
20. Peters R.W. Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 1999, 66:151-210.
21. Poggio L., Vrščaj B., Schulin R., Hepperle E., Marsan F.A. Metals pollution and human bioaccessibility of topsoils in Grugliasco (Italy). Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:680-689.
22. Pueyo M., Sastre J., Hernández E., Vidal M., López-Sánchez J.F., Rauret G. Prediction of trace element mobility in contaminated soils by sequential extraction. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:2054-2066.
23. Qian J., Wang Z.J., Shan X.Q. Progress in the investigation on plant availability of soil trace metals. Chin. J. Environ. Sci. (in Chinese) 1995, 16:73-75. 78.
24. 2EDTA and oxalate. J. Soil. Sediment. 2010, 10:45-53.
25. Reddy K.R., Chinthamreddy S. Comparison of extractants for removing heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils. Soil Sediment Contam. 2000, 9:449-462.
26. Sadiq R., Husain T. A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: A case study of drilling waste. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20:33-46.
27. Sadiq R., Kleiner Y., Rajani B. Water quality failures in distribution networks-Risk analysis using fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning. Risk anal. 2007, 27:1381-1394.
28. Shi X., Zhu A.X., Burt J.E., Qi F., Simonson D. A case-based reasoning approach to fuzzy soil mapping. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68:885-894.
29. Shomar B.H., Müller G., Yahya A. Geochemical features of top soils in the Gaza Strip: Natural occurrence and anthropogenic inputs. Environ. Res. 2005, 98:372-382.
30. Sun B., Zhao F.J., Lombi E., McGrath S.P. Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils using EDTA. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 113:111-120.
31. Tsang D.C.W., Zhang W.H., Lo I.M.C. Copper extraction effectiveness and soil dissolution issues of EDTA-flushing of artificially contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2007, 68:234-243.
32. Udovic M., Lestan D. EDTA leaching of Cu contaminated soils using ozone/UV for treatment and reuse of washing solution in a closed loop. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007, 181:319-327.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Remediation case studies: Thermal desorption, soil washing, and in-situ vitrification. EPA-542-R-95-005 1995, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington D.C., USA.
34. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure. Method 1312 1995, USEPA, Washington D.C., USA.
35. Van Reeuwijk L.P. Procedures for Soil Analysis 1992, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen.
36. Voegelin A., Barmettler K., Kretzschmar R. Heavy metal release from contaminated soils: Comparison of column leaching and batch extraction results. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:865-875.
37. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control. 1965, 8:338-353.
38. Zhang H., Zhao F.J., Sun B., Davison W., McGrath S.P. A new method to measure effective soil solution concentration predicts copper availability to plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35:2602-2607.
39. Zhang T., Liu J.M., Huang X.F., Xia B., Su C.Y., Luo G.F., Xu Y.W., Wu Y.X., Mao Z.W., Qiu R.L. Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils using new selective EDTA derivatives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262:464-471.
40. Zhang T., Wu Y.X., Huang X.F., Liu J.M., Xia B., Zhang W.H., Qiu R.L. Simultaneous extraction of Cr(VI) and Cu(II) from humic acid with new synthesized EDTA derivatives. Chemosphere. 2012, 88:730-735.
41. Zhu A.X., Hudson B., Burt J., Lubich K., Simonson D. Soil mapping using GIS, expert knowledge, and fuzzy logic. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65:1463-1472.
42. Zou Z.L., Qiu R.L., Zhang W.H., Dong H.Y., Zhao Z.H., Zhang T., Wei X.G., Cai X.D. The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:229-236.