Generation of a 3D printed temporal bone model with internal fidelity and validation of the mechanical construct

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 150, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 448-454

  Hochman, Jordan B ^a   Kraut, Jay ^a   Kazmerik, Katrice ^a   Unger, Bertram J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

mechanical properties; rapid prototype; temporal bone

Indexed keywords

CYANOACRYLATE; HYDROQUINONE;

ACOUSTICS; ANATOMIC MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE PLATE; BONE STRUCTURE; CADAVER; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL BONE; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; NONHUMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENT; SHEEP; SURGICAL APPROACH; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRABECULAR BONE; VIBRATION; YOUNG MODULUS;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; RAPID PROTOTYPE; TEMPORAL BONE;

ANIMALS; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHEEP; TEMPORAL BONE;

EID: 84896815333     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813518008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 ; 5: 335-341
2. Webb PA. A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector. J Med Eng Technol. 2000 ; 24: 149-153
3. McGurk M, Amis AA, Potamianos P, et al. Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 ; 79: 169-174
4. George AP, and De R. Review of temporal bone dissection teaching: how it was, is and will be. J Laryngol Otol. 2010 ; 124: 119-125
5. Begall K, Vorwerk U. Artificial petrous bone produced by stereolithography for microsurgical dissecting exercises. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1998 ; 60: 241-245
6. Torgerson C, Brydges R, Chen J, et al. Low fidelity simulation of temporal bone drilling leads to improved but suboptimal outcomes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007 ; 125: 470-472
7. Jackson A, John NW, Thacker NA, et al. Developing a virtual reality environment in Petrous bone surgery: a state-of-the-art review. Otol Neurotol. 2002 ; 23: 111-121
8. Suzuki M, Ogawa Y, Kawano A, et al. Rapid prototyping of temporal bone for surgical training and medical education. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 ; 124: 400-402
9. Nicholas J, Mankovich AMC, Noel G, et al. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imaging. 1990 ; 3: 200-203
10. Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, et al. Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 ; 31: 23-32
11. Silva DN, Gerhardt de Oliveira M, Meurer E, et al. Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 ; 36: 443-449
12. Mori K, Yamamoto T, Oyama K, et al. Modified three-dimensional skull base model with artificial dura mater, cranial nerves, and venous sinuses for training in skull base surgery: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008 ; 48: 582-588
13. Pettigrew Temporal Bones. http://www.temporal-bone.com/
14. Lorensen WE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graphics. 1987 ; 21: 163-169
15. Choi K, Kuhn JL, Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA. The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J Biomech. 1990 ; 23: 1103-1113
16. Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Yeh OC Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering and Design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill ; 2004 :