Uterine artery embolization using a transradial approach: Initial experience and technique

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 443-447

  Resnick, Neil J ^a   Kim, Edward ^a   Patel, Rahul S ^a   Lookstein, Robert A ^a   Nowakowski, F Scott ^a   Fischman, Aaron M ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEIOMYOMA; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896808311     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: 15357732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Spies, and J.P. Pelage Uterine artery embolization and gynecologic embolotherapy 2005 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia
2. J.H. Ravina, D. Herbreteau, and N. Ciraru-Vigneron et al. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata Lancet 346 1995 671 672
3. C. Gonsalves Uterine artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic fibroids Semin Intervent Radiol 25 2008 369 377
4. M.J. Bratby, N. Ramachandran, N. Sheppard, J. Kyriou, G.M. Munneke, and A.M. Belli Prospective study of elective bilateral versus unilateral femoral arterial puncture for uterine artery embolization Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 2007 1139 1143
5. M. Costantino, J. Lee, M. McCullough, H. Nsouli-Maktabi, and J.B. Spies Bilateral versus unilateral femoral access for uterine artery embolization: results of a randomized comparative trial J Vasc Interv Radiol 21 2010 829 835
6. S.S. Jolly, S. Amlani, and S. Harmon et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials Am Heart J 157 2009 132 140
7. S.S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, and J. Cairns et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial Lancet 377 2011 1409 1420
8. Y. Louvard, T. Lefevre, and A. Allain et al. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 52 2001 181 187
9. C.J. Cooper, R.A. El-Shiekh, and D.J. Cohen et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison Am Heart J 138 1999 430 436
10. D.N. Feldman, R.V. Swaminathan, and L.A. Kaltenbach et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012) Circulation 127 2013 2295 2306
11. L. Campeau Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 16 1989 3 7
12. F. Kiemeneij, and G.J. Laarman Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 30 1993 173 178
13. C. Frangos, and S. Nobel How to transform you into a radialist: literature review Cardiovasc Med 14 2011 277 282
14. S.C. Goodwin, S.C. Bonilla, and D. Sacks et al. Members of the Reporting Standards for Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) Subcommittee, the Members of the UAE Task Force Standards Subcommittee, and the Members of the Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee. Reporting Standards for Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomata J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 suppl 2003 S467 S476
15. G.R. Barbeau, F. Arsenault, L. Dugas, S. Simard, and M.M. Lariviere Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients Am Heart J 147 2004 489 493
16. T. Vuurmans, and D. Hilton Brewing the right cocktail for radial intervention Indian Heart J 62 2010 221 225
17. M. Hamon, S. Gomes, M.R. Clergeau, S. Fradin, R. Morello, and M. Hamon Risk of acute brain injury related to cerebral microembolism during cardiac catheterization performed by right upper limb arterial access Stroke 38 2007 2176 2179
18. A. Pacchioni, F. Versaci, and A. Mugnolo et al. Risk of brain injury during diagnostic coronary angiography: comparison between right and left radial approach Int J Cardiol 167 2012 3021 3026
19. K. Ratib, M.A. Mamas, H.C. Routledge, P.F. Ludman, D. Fraser, and J. Nolan Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention Am Heart J 165 2013 317 324
20. S. Pancholy, J. Coppola, T. Patel, and M. Roke-Thomas Prevention of radial artery occlusion - patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 72 2008 335 340
21. R.F. Tranbaugh, K.R. Dimitrova, and P. Friedmann et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention Circulation 11 suppl 2012 S170 S175