Mortality in patients with hypovolemic shock treated with colloids or crystalloids [1]

JAMA

Volumn 311, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1067-

  Perner, Anders ^a   Haase, Nicolai ^a   Wetterslev, Jørn ^a  

^a Mental Health Services CPH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COLLOID; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; CRYSTALLOID; DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPARISON; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG RESPONSE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HUMAN; HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LETTER; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; SHOCK;

COLLOIDS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; SHOCK;

EID: 84896794742     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.830     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al CRISTAL Investigators. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1809-1817.
2. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(6):429-438.
3. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, et al CHEST Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1901-1911.
4. Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, et al; 6S Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(2):124-134.
5. Zarychanski R, Abou-Setta AM, Turgeon AF, et al; Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(7):678-688.