Ovarian volume and antral follicle count assessed by MRI and transvaginal ultrasonography: A methodological study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 248-256

  Leonhardt, Henrik ^a   Gull, Berit ^a   Stener Victorin, Elisabet ^b   Hellström, Mikael ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Antral follicle count; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ovarian morphology; Ovarian volume; Three dimensional imaging; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES; METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES; OVARIAN VOLUME; POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME; REFERENCE STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ESTIMATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ADULT; ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT; INTRAOBSERVER AGREEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OVARIAN VOLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; THREE DIMENSIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; YOUNG ADULT;

ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARIAN MORPHOLOGY; OVARIAN VOLUME; THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGAN SIZE; OVARIAN FOLLICLE; POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896759171     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113495835     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Barber TM, Alvey C, Greenslade T, et al. Patterns of ovarian morphology in polycystic ovary syndrome: a study utilising magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2010;20: 1207-1213.
2. Yoo RY, Sirlin CB, Gottschalk M, et al. Ovarian imaging by magnetic resonance in obese adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2005;84: 985-995.
3. Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha TM, et al. ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 2010;20: 25-35.
4. Hauth EA, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ovaries of healthy women: determination of normal values. Acta Radiol 2006;47: 986-992.
5. Outwater EK, Mitchell DG. Normal ovaries and functional cysts: MR appearance. Radiology 1996;198: 397-402.
6. Hauth EA, Umutlu L, Libera H, et al. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome]. Rofo 2009;181: 543-548.
7. Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S, et al. Polycystic ovaries: implications of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201: 549-552.
8. Mitchell DG, Gefter WB, Spritzer CE, et al. Polycystic ovaries: MR imaging. Radiology 1986;160: 425-429.
9. Deb S, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, et al. Quantitative analysis of antral follicle number and size: a comparison of two-dimensional and automated three-dimensional ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35: 354-360.
10. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2002;77: 328-336.
11. Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril 2013;99: 963-969.
12. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004;19: 41-47.
13. Dewailly D, Gronier H, Poncelet E, et al. Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): revisiting the threshold values of follicle count on ultrasound and of the serum AMH level for the definition of polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod 2011;26: 3123-3129.
14. Lujan ME, Jarrett BY, Brooks ED, et al. Updated ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: reliable thresholds for elevated follicle population and ovarian volume. Hum Reprod 2013;28: 1361-1368.
15. Leonhardt H, Gull B, Kishimoto K, et al. Uterine morphology and peristalsis in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Radiol 2012;53: 1195-1201.
16. Manneras-Holm L, Leonhardt H, Kullberg J, et al. Adipose tissue has aberrant morphology and function in PCOS: enlarged adipocytes and low serum adiponectin, but not circulating sex steroids, are strongly associated with insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:E304-E311.
17. Deb S, Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33: 477-483.
18. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86: 420-428.
19. Lam PM, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Threedimensional ultrasound features of the polycystic ovary and the effect of different phenotypic expressions on these parameters. Hum Reprod 2007;22: 3116-3123.