A better route to tech standards

Science

Volumn 343, Issue 6174, 2014, Pages 972-973

  Lerner, Josh ^a   Tirole, Jean ^b  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; POLICY MAKING; PRICE DYNAMICS; STATE ROLE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; STANDARDIZATION; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84896735848     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1246439     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Lemley and Shapiro (2) suggest that these disputes be settled via arbitration, making adjudication more expedient, better informed, and overall more consistent.
2. M. A. Lemley, C. Shapiro, Berkeley Technol. Law J. 28, 1135 (2013).
3. J. Lerner, J. Tirole, "Standard-essential patents" (Working paper no. 19664, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2013).
4. D. P. Majoras, "Recognizing the procompetitive potential of royalty discussions in standard setting," Standardization and the Law, Stanford University, 23 September 2005; www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public- statements/recognizing-procompetitive-potential-royalty-discussions-standard- setting/050923stanford. pdf.
5. National Academy of Sciences, Patent Challenges for Standard-Setting in the Global Economy: Lessons From Information and Communications Technology (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2013).
6. T.O. Barnett, "Business Review Letter: VITA," Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 30 October 2006.
7. J. L. Contreras, Jurimetrics 53, 163 (2013).