Segregation, gentrification, and residualisation: From public housing to market-driven housing allocation in inner city Stockholm

International Journal of Housing Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 3-29

  Andersson, Roger ^a,b   Turner, Lena Magnusson ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORWEGIAN SOCIAL RESEARCH NOVA   (Norway)

Author keywords

gentrification; public housing; segregation; Stockholm; Sweden; tenure conversions

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; DECISION MAKING; GENTRIFICATION; HOUSING POLICY; INNER CITY AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; TENURE SYSTEM; URBAN HOUSING;

STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

EID: 84896731218     PISSN: 14616718     EISSN: 14733269     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2013.872949     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersson, R. (2013). Reproducing and reshaping ethnic residential segregation in Stockholm: The role of selective migration moves. Geografiska Annaler B, 95(2), 163-187. doi:10.1111/geob.12015
2. Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å., & Holmqvist, E. (2010). Counteracting segregation: Swedish policies and experiences. Housing Studies, 25(2), 237-256.
3. Andersson, R., & Kährik, A. (in press). Widening gaps: Segregation dynamics during two decades of economic and institutional change in Stockholm. In T. Tammaru, M. van Ham, & S. Musterd (Eds.), New perspectives on social segregation in European cities.
4. Bengtsson, B. (2012, June). Path dependence or historical juncture? The Swedish housing regime before and after adjustment to the European competition policy. Paper presented at the ENHR 2012 Conference 'Housing: Local Welfare and Local Markets in a Globalised World', Lillehammer, Norway.
5. Bergsten, Z. (2010). Bättre framtidsutsikter? Blandade bostadsområden och grannskapseffekter: En analys av visioner och effekter av blandat boende [Better prospects through social mix? Mixed neighbourhoods and neighbourhood effects: An analysis of the purpose and effects of social mix policy]. Uppsala: Geografiska regionstudier 85, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.
6. Bergsten, Z., & Holmqvist, E. (2013). Possibilities of building a mixed city - evidence from Swedish cities. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13(3), 288-311.doi:10.1080/14616718.2013.809211
7. Borgegård, L.-E., & Murdie, R. (1993). Sociodemographic impacts of economic restructuring on Stockholm's inner-city. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(4), 269-280.
8. Boverket. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.boverket.se/Global/Webbokhandel/Dokument/2011/BME-2011-2012.pdf
9. Christophers, B. (2013). A monstrous hybrid: The political economy of housing in early-twenty-first-century Sweden. New Political Economy, 18(6), 885-911.
10. Elander, I. (1991). Good dwellings for all: The case of social rented housing in Sweden. Housing Studies, 6(1), 29-43.
11. Fahey, T., & Norris, M. (2011). Housing in the welfare state: Rethinking the conceptual foundations of comparative housing policy analysis. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(4), 439-452.
12. Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1988). Selling the welfare state: The privatisation of public housing. London: Routledge.
13. Geosweden. (2010). Database owned by the Institute of Housing and Urban Research. Uppsala University.
14. Glaeser, E.L., & Shapiro, J.M. (2003). Urban growth in the 1990s: Is city living back? Journal of Regional Science, 43(1), 139-165.
15. Gruis, V., Elsinga, M., Wolters, A., & Priemus, H. (2005). Tenant empowerment through innovative tenures: An analysis of Woonbron-Maasoevers' client's choice programme. Housing Studies, 20(1), 127-147.
16. Hamnett, C. (1994). Socio-economic change in London: Professionalization not polarisation. Built Environment, 20(3), 192-203.
17. Harloe, M. (1995). The people's home? Social rented housing in Europe and America. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Hedin, K., Clark, E., Lundholm, E., & Malmberg, G. (2012). Neoliberalization of housing in Sweden: Gentrification, filtering and social polarization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(2), 443-463.
19. Holmqvist, E. (2009). Politik och planering för ett blandat boende och minskad boendesegregation: Ett mål utan medel? [Policy and planning for social and housing mix and decreased housing segregation: A goal without means?]. Uppsala: Geografiska regionstudier 79, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.
20. Holt Brook, J., Kinver, A., & Strachen, V. (2006). Views and experiences of the right to buy amongst tenants and purchasers. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.
21. Jager, M. (1986). Class definition and the esthetics of gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification of the city (pp. 78-91). Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
22. Joakim Larsson Blog. (2012). Retrieved from http://moderaterna.net/joakim/category/bostadspolitik/
23. Jones, C., & Murie, A. (2006). The right to buy: Analysis & evaluation of a housing policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
24. Kemeny, J. (1995). Swedish social renting in comparative perspective. In E. Brunsdon & M. May (Eds.), Swedish welfare: Policy and provision. London: Social Policy Association.
25. Kleinhans, R.J., & Elsinga, M. (2010). 'Buy your home and feel in control' does home ownership achieve the empowerment of former tenants of social housing? International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 41-61.
26. Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E.K. (2010). The gentrification reader. London: Routledge.
27. Ley, D. (1996). The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Lind, H., & Lundström, S. (2007). Bostäder på marknadens villkor [Housing on market terms]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
29. Lindbom, A. (2001). Dismantling Swedish housing policy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(4), 503-526.
30. Magnusson, L. (2006). Gentrification - the prospect of European cities? Open House International, 30(3), 54-60.
31. Magnusson, L., & Andersson, R. (2008). Socioekonomiska och demografiska konsekvenser av ombildningen av hyresrätter till bostadsrätter i Stockholms stad 1995-2004 [Socioeconomic and demographic effects of conversion from rented to cooperative housing in Stockholm city, 1995-2004]. Research report (in Swedish). Uppsala: Institute for housing and urban research, Uppsala University.
32. Magnusson, L., & Turner, B. (2008). Municipal housing companies in Sweden - social by default. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(4), 275-296.
33. Malpass, P. (1990). Reshaping housing policy: Subsidies, rents and residualization. London: Routledge.
34. Meusen, H., & van Kempen, R. (1995). Towards residual housing? A comparison of Britain and the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 10(3), 239-258.
35. Millard-Ball, A. (2000). Moving beyond the gentrification gaps: Social change, tenure change and gap theories in Stockholm. Urban Studies, 37(9), 1673-1693.
36. Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W., & McKenzie, R.D. (Eds.). (1925). The city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(3), 462-465.
38. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
39. Turner, B. (1994). Rental housing in Sweden - why is it not residualised? In R.N. Sharma (Ed.), Indo-Swedish perspectives on affordable housing (pp. 168-194). Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
40. Turner, B. (1997). Housing cooperatives in Sweden: The effects of financial deregulation. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 15(2), 193-217.
41. Turner, B., & Whitehead, C. (2002). Reducing housing subsidy: Swedish housing policy in an international context. Urban Studies, 39(2), 201-217.
42. van Kempen, R., & Priemus, H. (2002). Revolution in social housing in the Netherlands: Possible effects of new housing policies. Urban Studies, 39(2), 237-253.
43. Whitehead, C., & Scanlon, K. (Eds.). (2007). Social housing in Europe. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.