To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance

NeuroImage

Volumn 91, Issue , 2014, Pages 228-236

  Cross, Katy A ^a   Iacoboni, Marco ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Imitation; Motor preparation; Motor resonance; Stimulus response compatibility; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR RESONANCE; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; RESPONSE TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STIMULUS RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

IMITATION; MOTOR PREPARATION; MOTOR RESONANCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CUES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; MIRROR NEURONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896725848     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Avenanti A., Bolognini N., Maravita A., Aglioti S.M. Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:2129-2135.
2. Baldissera F., Cavallari P., Craighero L., Fadiga L. Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of hand actions in humans. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 13(1):190-194.
3. Barchiesi G., Cattaneo L. Early and late motor responses to action observation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 8:711-714.
4. Beck S., Hallett M. Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121:98-103.
5. Bertenthal B.I., Longo M.R., Kosobud A. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:210-225.
6. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn. 2000, 44:124-143.
7. Catmur C., Walsh V., Heyes C. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1527-1531.
8. Chartrand T.L., Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 76:893-910.
9. Chong T.T.J., Williams M.A., Cunnington R., Mattingley J.B. Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation. Neuroimage 2008, 40:298-307.
10. Chong T.T., Cunnington R., Williams M.A., Mattingley J.B. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:786-795.
11. Conte A., Gilio F., Iezzi E., Frasca V., Inghilleri M., Berardelli A. Attention influences the excitability of cortical motor areas in healthy humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 182:109-117.
12. Cross K.A., Torrisi S., Losin E.A., Iacoboni M. Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems. Neuroimage 2013, 83:493-504.
13. De Jong R. Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1995, 88:187-207.
14. De Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1994, 20:731-750.
15. De Renzi E., Cavalleri F., Facchini S. Imitation and utilisation behaviour. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1996, 61:396-400.
16. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 1992, 91:176-180.
17. Ehrenstein A., Proctor R.W. Selecting mapping rules and responses in mixed compatibility four-choice tasks. Psychol. Res. 1998, 61:231-248.
18. Eimer, Hommel, Prinz S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1995, 90:301-313.
19. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J. Neurophysiol. 1995, 73:2608-2611.
20. Ferrari P.F., Bonini L., Fogassi L. From monkey mirror neurons to primate behaviours: possible 'direct' and 'indirect' pathways. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:2311-2323.
21. Heister G., Schroeder-Heister P. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1994, 85:15-24.
22. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999, 286:2526-2528.
23. Koch G., Versace V., Bonnì S., Lupo F., Lo Gerfo E., Oliveri M., Caltagirone C. Resonance of cortico-cortical connections of the motor system with the observation of goal directed grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3513-3520.
24. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
25. Leighton J., Bird G., Orsini C., Heyes C. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46:905-910.
26. Lhermitte F., Pillon B., Serdaru M. Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: imitation and utilization behavior: a neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Ann. Neurol. 1986, 19:326-334.
27. Lidierth M. A computer based method for automated measurement of the periods of muscular activity from an EMG and its application to locomotor EMGs. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 64:378-380.
28. Liepelt R., Ullsperger M., Obst K., Spengler S., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. Contextual movement constraints of others modulate motor preparation in the observer. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:268-275.
29. Likowski K.U., Mühlberger A., Seibt B., Pauli P., Weyers P. Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 44:1065-1072.
30. Molenberghs P., Hayward L., Mattingley J.B., Cunnington R. Activation patterns during action observation are modulated by context in mirror system areas. Neuroimage 2012, 59:608-615.
31. Newman-Norlund R.D., van Schie H.T., van Zuijlen A.M.J., Bekkering H. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:817-818.
32. Pearce A.J., Kidgell D.J. Corticomotor excitability during precision motor tasks. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2009, 12:280-283.
33. Press C., Bird G., Walsh E., Heyes C. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions. Brain Cogn. 2008, 67:44-50.
34. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:169-192.
35. Rösler K.M., Petrow E., Mathis J., Arányi Z., Hess C.W., Magistris M.R. Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:1680-1687.
36. Shaffer L.H. Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. J. Exp. Psychol. 1965, 70:284-288.
37. Spengler S., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:3704-3718.
38. Stefan K., Wycislo M., Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92:66-72.
39. Stoffels E.J. Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: an SR compatibility study. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 1996, 94:227-252.
40. Stürmer B., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2000, 26:1746-1759.
41. van Baaren R.B., Maddux W.W., Chartrand T.L., de Bouter C., van Knippenberg A. It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84:1093-1102.
42. Vu K.P., Proctor R.W. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 2004, 57:539-556.