Prognostic implications of atrio-ventricular block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era

Acute Cardiac Care

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-8

  Gómez Talavera, Sandra ^a   Vivas, David ^a   Perez Vizcayno, María Jose ^a   Hernández Antolín, Rosana ^a   Fernández Ortíz, Antonio ^a   Bañuelos, Camino ^a   Escaned, Javier ^a   Jiménez Quevedo, Pilar ^a   Viliani, Dafne ^a   Vilacosta, Isidre ^a   Macaya, Carlos ^a   Alfonso, Fernando ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Heart block; Myocardial infarction; Primary coronary angioplasty; Survival

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; CORONARY CARE UNIT; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIRST DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART REINFARCTION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SECOND DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; SEX DIFFERENCE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; STENTS;

EID: 84896723175     PISSN: 17482941     EISSN: 1748295X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17482941.2013.869343     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berger PB, Ruocco NA Jr, Ryan TJ, Frederick MM, Jacobs AK, Faxon DR Incidence and prognostic implications of heart block complicating inferior myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy: Results from TIMI II. J Am Coil Cardiol. 1992;20:533-40.
2. Berger PB, Ryan TJ. Inferior infarction: High risk subgroups. Circulation 1990;81:401-11.
3. Tans AC, Lie K I, Durrer D. Clinical setting and prognostic significance of high degree atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction: A study of 144 patients. Am Heart J. 1980;99:4-8.
4. Dubois C, Pi? rard LA, Smeets JP, Carlier J, Kulbertus HE. Long-term prognostic significance of atrioventricular block in inferior acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1989;10: 8 16-20.
5. Jones ME, Terry G, Kenmure AC. Frequency and significance of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1977;94:163-7.
6. Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, Wilkinson P, Ranjadayala n K, Timmis AD. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998;19: 893-8.
7. Abidov A, Kaluski E, H od H, Leor J, Vered Z, Gottlieb S, et al., Israel Working Group on Intensive Cardiac Care. Influence of conduction disturbances on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis (results from the ARGAMI-2 study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:76-80.
8. Bhalli MA, Khan MQ, Samore NA, Mehreen S. Frequency and clinical outcome in conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. J Ayub Med Coil Abbotta bad. 2009;21:32-7.
9. Nicod P, Gilpin E, Dittrich H, Polikar R, Henning H, Ross J Jr. Long-term outcome in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and complete atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12:5 89-94.
10. Jurkovicova O, Cag?n S. Supraventricular arrhythmias and disorders of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction in patients with acute myocardial infarction . Bratisl Lek Listy. 1998;99:172-80.
11. Harpaz D, Behar SM, Gottlieb S, Boyko V, Kishon Y, Ekdar M, et al. Complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. J Am Coil Cardiol. 1999;34: 172 1-8.
12. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW, O?Keefe J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Eng Med. 1993;328:673-9.
13. Zijistra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH, Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:680-4.
14. Zijlstra F, Hnnrntje JC, de Boer MJ, Reiffers S, Miedema K, Ottervanger JR et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1413-9.
15. de Boer ML Suryapranata H , Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Liem AL, Miedema K et al. Limitation of infarct size and preservation of left ventricular function after primary coronary angioplasty compa red with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994;90:753-61.
16. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, et al. Comparison of prim ary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:2093-8.
17. Keeley CE, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angi oplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 36 1:13-20.
18. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomst rom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the Eur opean Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909-45.
19. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 g uidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210-47.
20. Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, Garcia E, Mattos LA, Giambartolomei A, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction (Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group). N Engl Med. 1999;341:1949-56.
21. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, Garcia B, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:957-66.
22. Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, Wilkinson P, Ranjadayalan K, Timmis AD. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998;1 9:893-8.
23. Jones ME, Terry G, Kenmure AC. Frequency and significance of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1977;94:163-7.
24. Meine TJ, Al-Khatib SM, Alexander JH, Granger CB, White HD, Kilaru R, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am Hear t J. 2005;149:670-4.
25. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, Zlotikamien B, Chetrit A, Olmer L, et al. Admission clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics predicting in-hospital development of high-degree atrioventricular bloc k in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1134-8.
26. Jim MH, Chan AO, Tse HF, Barold SS, Lau CR Clinical and angiographic findings of complete atrioventricular bl ock in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Ann Ac Ad Med Singapore. 2010;39: 185-90.
27. Harper R, Hunt D, Vohra J, Peter T, Sloman G. His bundle electrogram in patients with acute myocard ial infarction complicated by auriculoventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances. Br Heart J. 1975;37:705-10.
28. Vivas BD, Perez VMJ, Hern?ndez AR, Fern? ndez OA, Banuelos C, Escaned J, et al. Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1276-83.
29. Viliani D, Vivas BD, Chung M, Perez VMJ, Hernandez AR, Ba? uelos C et al. Prognosis of different types of atrial fibrillation in primary angioplastia era. Coron Artery Dis. 2012;23:511-6.