메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 262-266

Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency lesioning for trigeminal neuralgia: Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain improvement for patient-reported outcomes

Author keywords

Barrow neurological institute pain scale; Facial pain; Minimum clinically important difference; Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency lesioning; Trigeminal neuralgia; Visual analog scale

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BARROW NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE PAIN SCALE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH TRANSITION INDEX; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROSURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RATING SCALE; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRIGEMINUS NEURALGIA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84896723115     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000262     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (12)

References (14)
  • 1
    • 79952632450 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The measurement of pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia
    • Chen HI, Lee JY. The measurement of pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurosurg. 2010;57:129-133.
    • (2010) Clin Neurosurg , Issue.57 , pp. 129-133
    • Chen, H.I.1    Lee, J.Y.2
  • 2
    • 80053576727 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical rhizotomy for refractory trigeminal neuralgia
    • Tang CT, Chang SD, Tseng KY, Liu MY, Ju DT. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical rhizotomy for refractory trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18(11):1449-1453.
    • (2011) J Clin Neurosci , vol.18 , Issue.11 , pp. 1449-1453
    • Tang, C.T.1    Chang, S.D.2    Tseng, K.Y.3    Liu, M.Y.4    Ju, D.T.5
  • 3
    • 79953190029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia after a minimum 3-year follow-up
    • Park SH, Hwang SK. Outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia after a minimum 3-year follow-up. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(5):645-648.
    • (2011) J Clin Neurosci , vol.18 , Issue.5 , pp. 645-648
    • Park, S.H.1    Hwang, S.K.2
  • 4
    • 0034237191 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: The initial experience of the Barrow Neurological Institute
    • Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of the Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(4):1013-1019.
    • (2000) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , vol.47 , Issue.4 , pp. 1013-1019
    • Rogers, C.L.1    Shetter, A.G.2    Fiedler, J.A.3    Smith, K.A.4    Han, P.P.5    Speiser, B.L.6
  • 5
    • 84876733612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Microvascular decompression for classic trigeminal neuralgia: Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain improvement for patient reported outcomes
    • Reddy VK, Parker SL, Patrawala SA, Lockney DT, Su P-F, Mericle RA. Microvascular decompression for classic trigeminal neuralgia: determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain improvement for patient reported outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(5):749-754.
    • (2013) Neurosurgery , vol.72 , Issue.5 , pp. 749-754
    • Reddy, V.K.1    Parker, S.L.2    Patrawala, S.A.3    Lockney, D.T.4    Su, P.-F.5    Mericle, R.A.6
  • 6
    • 0031788970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 1
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther. 1998;78(11):1186-1196.
    • (1998) Phys Ther , vol.78 , Issue.11 , pp. 1186-1196
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2    Riddle, D.L.3    Guyatt, G.H.4
  • 7
    • 0024852022 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of health status: Ascertaining theminimal clinically important difference
    • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining theminimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407-415.
    • (1989) Control Clin Trials , vol.10 , Issue.4 , pp. 407-415
    • Jaeschke, R.1    Singer, J.2    Guyatt, G.H.3
  • 8
    • 79955761307 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis
    • Wright AA, Cook CE, Baxter GD, Dockerty JD, Abbott JH. A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(5):319-327.
    • (2011) J Orthop Sports Phys Ther , vol.41 , Issue.5 , pp. 319-327
    • Wright, A.A.1    Cook, C.E.2    Baxter, G.D.3    Dockerty, J.D.4    Abbott, J.H.5
  • 9
    • 34748883705 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods
    • Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7(5):541-546.
    • (2007) Spine J , vol.7 , Issue.5 , pp. 541-546
    • Copay, A.G.1    Subach, B.R.2    Glassman, S.D.3    Polly Jr., D.W.4    Schuler, T.C.5
  • 10
    • 79955638763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    • Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, et al. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):598-604.
    • (2011) J Neurosurg Spine , vol.14 , Issue.5 , pp. 598-604
    • Parker, S.L.1    Adogwa, O.2    Paul, A.R.3
  • 11
    • 77952412409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Neck disability index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: The minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion
    • Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(6):469-474.
    • (2010) Spine J , vol.10 , Issue.6 , pp. 469-474
    • Carreon, L.Y.1    Glassman, S.D.2    Campbell, M.J.3    Anderson, P.A.4
  • 12
    • 54449084430 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36 and pain scales
    • Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008;8(6):968-974.
    • (2008) Spine J , vol.8 , Issue.6 , pp. 968-974
    • Copay, A.G.1    Glassman, S.D.2    Subach, B.R.3    Berven, S.4    Schuler, T.C.5    Carreon, L.Y.6
  • 14
    • 28444439082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trigeminal neuralgia: Definition and classification
    • Eller JL, Raslan AM, Burchiel KJ. Trigeminal neuralgia: definition and classification. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(5):E3.
    • (2005) Neurosurg Focus , vol.18 , Issue.5
    • Eller, J.L.1    Raslan, A.M.2    Burchiel, K.J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.