Negotiating risky bodies: Childbirth and constructions of risk

Health, Risk and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 68-83

  Chadwick, Rachelle Joy ^a   Foster, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

childbirth; elective Caesarean section; embodiment; home birth; risk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MATERNAL CARE; PREGNANT WOMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; SNOWBALL SAMPLE; SOCIAL CLASS; TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANT; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 84896720496     PISSN: 13698575     EISSN: 14698331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2013.863852     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Annandale, E., 1988. How midwives accomplish natural birth: managing risk and balancing expectation. Social problems, 35 (2), 95-110.
2. Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
3. Bogg, L., et al., 2010. Dramatic increase of Cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Social science & medicine, 70, 1544-1549.
4. Boucher, D., et al., 2009. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 54, 119-126.
5. Bourdieu, P., 2005. Habitus. In: J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, eds. Habitus: a sense of place. Aldershot: Ashgate, 43-52.
6. Bradby, B., 1998. Like a video: the sexualisation of childbirth in Bolivia. Reproductive health matters, 6 (12), 50-56.
7. Bryant, J., et al., 2007. Caesarean birth: consumption, safety, order and good mothering. Social science & medicine, 65, 1192-1201.
8. Chadwick, R. and Foster, D., 2013. Technologies of gender and childbirth choices: home birth, elective caesarean and white femininities in South Africa. Feminism & psychology, 23 (3), 317-338.
9. Cheyney, M., 2008. Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qualitative health research, 18, 254-267.
10. Cheyney, M., 2011. Reinscribing the birthing body: homebirth as ritual performance. Medical anthropology quarterly, 25 (4), 519-542.
11. Davis-Floyd, R., 2003. Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12. Davis-Floyd, R. and Sargent, C., eds., 1997. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13. Denham, A., 2012. Shifting maternal responsibilities and the trajectory of blame in northern Ghana. In: L. Fordyce and A. Maraesa, eds. Risk, reproduction, and narratives of experience. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 173-189.
14. Diniz, S. and Chacham, A., 2004. 'The cut above' and 'the cut below': the abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in São Paulo, Brazil. Reproductive health matters, 12, 100-110.
15. Douché, J. and Carryer, J., 2011. Caesarean section in the absence of need: a pathologising paradox for public health? Nursing inquiry, 18 (2), 143-153.
16. Edwards, N., 2005. Birthing autonomy: women's experiences of planning home births. London: Routledge.
17. Edwards, N. and Murphy-Lawless, J., 2006. The instability of risk: women's perspectives on risk and safety in childbirth. In: A. Symon, ed. Risk and choice in maternity care: an international perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, 35-50.
18. Fenwick, J., Staff, L., and Creedy, D., 2010. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery, 26, 394-400.
19. Fox, B. and Worts, D., 1999. Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth: a contribution to the sociology of birth. Gender & society, 13 (3), 326-346.
20. Grosz, E., 1989. Sexual subversions: three French feminists. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
21. Hausman, B., 2005. Risky business: framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of medical humanities, 26 (1), 23-38.
22. Helén, I., 2004. Technics over life: risk, ethics and the existential condition in high-tech antenatal care. Economy & society, 33 (1), 28-51.
23. Jordan, B., 1997. Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: R. Davis-Floyd and C. Sargent, eds. Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: cross-cultural perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 55-79.
24. Karlström, A., et al., 2011. Behind the myth - few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of obstetrical factors. Midwifery, 27 (5), 620-627.
25. Kelhä, M., 2009. Too old to become a mother? Risk constructions in 35+ women's experiences of pregnancy, child-birth, and postnatal care. Nordic journal of feminist & gender research, 17 (2), 89-103.
26. Kingdon, C., et al., 2003. Who's choosing caesarean section? British journal of midwifery, 11 (6), 391.
27. Klassen, P., 2001. Blessed events: religion and home birth in America. Princeton University Press.
28. Knaak, S., 2010. Contextualising risk, constructing choice: breastfeeding and good mothering in risk society. Health, risk & society, 12 (4), 369-383.
29. Kornelsen, J., 2005. Essences and imperatives: an investigation of technology in childbirth. Social science & medicine, 61, 1495-1504.
30. Lankshear, G., Ettore, E., and Mason, D., 2005. Decision-making, uncertainty and risk: exploring the complexity of work processes in NHS delivery suites. Health, risk & society, 7 (4), 361-377.
31. Law, J., 2000. The politics of breastfeeding: assessing risk, dividing labor. Signs, 25 (2), 407-450.
32. Lawrie, T., de Jager, M., and Hofmeyr, J., 2001. High cesarean section rates for pregnant medical practitioners in South Africa. International journal of gynecology & obstetrics, 72 (1), 71-73.
33. Lee, E., 2007a. Health, morality and infant feeding: British mothers experiences of formula milk use in the early weeks. Sociology of health & illness, 29 (7), 1075-1090.
34. Lee, E., 2007b. Infant feeding in risk society. Health, risk & society, 9 (3), 295-309.
35. Lee, E., 2008. Living with risk in the age of 'intensive motherhood': maternal identity and infant feeding. Health, risk & society, 10 (5), 467-477.
36. Lindgren, H., et al., 2008. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery, 26, 163-172.
37. Lupton, D., 1999a. Risk. London: Routledge.
38. Lupton, D. ed., 1999b. Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press.
39. Lupton, D., ed., 1999c. Risk and the ontology of pregnant embodiment. In Risk and sociocultural theory. Cambridge University Press, 59-85.
40. Lupton, D., 2008. You feel so responsible': australian mothers' concepts and experiences related to promoting the health and development of their young children. In: H. Zoller and M. Dutta, eds. Emerging perspectives in health communication: meaning, culture, and power. New York: Routledge, 113-128.
41. Lupton, D., 2011. 'The best thing for the baby': mothers' concepts and experiences related to promoting their infants' health and development. Health, risk & society, 13 (7-8), 637-651.
42. Lupton, D., 2012. 'Precious cargo': foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical public health, 22 (3), 329-340.
43. Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 1998. The adolescent 'unfinished body': reflexivity and HIV/AIDS risk. Body & society, 4 (2), 19-34.
44. Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 2002a. 'Life would be pretty dull without risk': voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, risk & society, 4 (2), 113-124.
45. Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J., 2002b. Risk is part of your life': risk epistemologies among a group of Australians. Sociology, 36 (2), 317-334.
46. Lyerly, A., 2006. Shame, gender, birth. Hypatia, 21 (1), 101-118.
47. Macdonald, M., 2006. Gender expectations: natural bodies and natural births in the new midwifery in Canada. Medical anthropology quarterly, 20 (2), 235-256.
48. Mackenzie Bryers, H. and van Teijlingen, E., 2010. Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery, 26 (5), 488-496.
49. Martin, E., 1987. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
50. McCourt, C., Bick, D., and Weaver, J., 2004. Caesarean section: perceived demand. British journal of midwifery, 12 (7), 412-413.
51. McDonald, K., Amir, L., and Davey, M., 2011. Maternal bodies and medicines: a commentary on risk and decision-making of pregnant and breastfeeding women and health professionals. BMC public health, 11 (5), S5.
52. Miller, A. and Shriver, T., 2012. Women's childbirth preferences and practices in the United States. Social science & medicine, 75, 709-716.
53. Munro, S., Kornelsen, J., and Hutton, E., 2009. Decision-making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories. Journal of midwifery & women's health, 54 (4), 373-379.
54. Murphy, E., 2003. Expertise and forms of knowledge in the government of families. Sociology of health & illness, 51 (4), 433-462.
55. Murphy, E., 2004. Risk, maternal ideologies, and infant feeding. In: J. Germov and L. Williams, eds. A sociology of food and nutrition. Oxford University Press, 242-258.
56. Naidoo, N. and Moodley, J., 2009. Rising rates of caesarean sections: an audit of caesarean sections in specialist private practice. South African family practice, 51 (3), 254-258.
57. Parker, I., 1992. Discourse dynamics: critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
58. Possamai-Inesedy, A., 2006. Confining risk: choice and responsibility in childbirth in a risk society. Health sociology review, 15, 406-414.
59. Potter, J., 1997. Discourse and critical social psychology. In: T. Ibanez and L. Iniguez, eds. Critical social psychology. London: Sage, 55-66.
60. Root, R. and Browner, C., 2001. Practices of the pregnant self: compliance with and resistance to prenatal norms. Culture, medicine & psychiatry, 25, 195-223.
61. Rothberg, A. and Macleod, H., 2005. Private-sector caesarean sections in perspective. South African medical journal, 95 (4), 257-260.
62. Rothman, B., 1982. In labor: women and power in the birthplace. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
63. Ruhl, L., 1999. Liberal governance and prenatal care: risk and regulation in pregnancy. Economy & society, 28 (1), 95-117.
64. Scamell, M., 2011. The swan effect in midwifery talk and practice: a tension between normality and the language of risk. Sociology of health & illness, 33 (7), 987-1001.
65. Scamell, M. and Alaszewski, A., 2012. Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth. Health, risk & society, 14 (2), 207-221.
66. Seibold, C., et al., 2010. 'Lending the space': midwives perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management. Midwifery, 26, 526-531.
67. Smith-Oka, V., 2012. Bodies of risk: constructing motherhood in a Mexican public hospital. Social science and medicine, 75, 2275-2282.
68. Smith, V., Devane, D., and Murphy-Lawless, J., 2012. Risk in maternity care: a concept analysis. International journal of childbirth, 2 (2), 126-135.
69. South African Demographic and Health Survey. 2003, 2007. Department of Health, Medical Research Council. Pretoria: Department of Health.
70. Tshibangu, K., et al., 2002. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector - 3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital. South African medical journal, 92 (12), 956-959.
71. Tulloch, J. and Lupton, D. eds., 2003. Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.
72. Viisainen, K., 2000. The moral dangers of home birth: parents' perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland. Sociology of health & illness, 22 (6), 792-814.