The CRITICAL DIFFERENCE in models of speech production: A response to Roelofs and Piai

Cortex

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 123-127

  Mahon, Bradford Z ^a,b   Navarrete, Eduardo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MODEL; NOTE; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTICS; SIMULATION; SPEECH; STROOP TEST; THEORETICAL STUDY; WEAVER++ MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; STROOP TEST;

EID: 84896706926     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.001     Document Type: Note

References (33)

1. Caramazza A., Costa A. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?. Cognition 2000, 75:B51-B64.
2. Caramazza A., Costa A. Set size and repetition in the picture-word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming. Cognition 2001, 80:291-298.
3. Dalrymple-Alford E.C. Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop coloreword tests. Perception and Psychophysics 1972, 11(4):274-276.
4. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 1986, 3:283-321.
5. Dell G.S., Oppenheim G.M., Kittredge A.K. Saying the right word at the right time: syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:583-608.
6. Dell'Acqua R., Sessa P., Peressotti F., Mulatti C., Navarrete E., Grainger J. ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology 2010, 1:a177.
7. Dhooge E., De Baene W., Hartsuiker R.J. A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language 2013, 124:232-237.
8. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:878-891.
9. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2011, 18:116-122.
10. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. Lexical selection and verbal self-monitoring: effects of lexicality, context, and time pressure in picture-word interference. Journal of Memory and Cognition 2012, 66:163-176.
11. Glaser W.R., Glaser M.O. Context effects on Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118(1):13-42.
12. Greenham S.L., Stelmack R.M., Campbell K.B. Effects of attention and semantic relation on event-related potentials in a picture-word naming task. Biological Psychology 2000, 50:79-104.
13. Hirschfeld G., Jansma B., Bölte J., Zwitserlood P. Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials. NeuroReport 2008, 19:1227-1230.
14. Indefrey P. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:255.
15. Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: evidence for the response selection hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:249-256.
16. Kuipers J., La Heij W., Costa A. A further look at semantic context effects in language production: the role of response congruency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2006, 21:892-919.
17. Lupker S.J., Katz A.N. Input, decision, and response factors in picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1981, 7:269-282.
18. Mädebach A., Oppermann F., Hantsch A., Curda C., Jescheniak J.D. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:522-538.
19. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33(3):503-535.
20. Mahon B.Z., Garcea F.E., Navarrete E. Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis: a response to Mulatti and Coltheart. Cortex 2012, 48:373-377.
21. Mulatti C., Coltheart M. Picture-word interference and the response-exclusion hypothesis. Cortex 2012, 48:363-372.
22. Navarrete E., Del Prato P., Mahon B.Z. Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 38:1-15.
23. Navarrete E., Mahon B.Z. A rose by any other name is still a rose: a reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach. Language and Cognitive Processes 2013, 28:701-716.
24. Piai V., Roelofs A., Schriefers H. Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:404-423.
25. Piai V., Roelofs A., Schriefers H. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance. Memory and Cognition 2012, 40:614-627.
26. Piai V., Roelofs A., Van der Meij R. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming. Brain Research 2012, 1450:87-101.
27. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142.
28. Roelofs A. Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition 2001, 80:283-290.
29. Roelofs A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 2003, 110:88-125.
30. Roelofs A. Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: evaluation of WEAVER++. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech 2005, 42-63. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. R.J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, F. Wijnen (Eds.).
31. Roelofs A., Piai V. Associative facilitation in the Stroop task: comment on Mahon etal. (2013). Cortex 2013, 49:1767-1769.
32. Roelofs A., Piai V., Schriefers H. Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:1032-1038.
33. Simon J.R., Sudalaimuthu P. Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:176-187.