Meta-Analysis of protocolized goal-directed hemodynamic optimization for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Wira, Charles R ^a,b   Dodge, Kelly ^a   Sather, John ^a   Dziura, James ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergency Medicine; Goal directed therapy; Sepsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MORTALITY; PATIENT CARE; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; META ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SHOCK, SEPTIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SEPSIS; SHOCK, SEPTIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84896706287     PISSN: 1936900X     EISSN: 19369018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2013.7.6828     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Friedman G, Silva E, Vincent JL. Has the mortality of septic shock changed with time" Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2078-2086.
2. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 1546-1554.
3. Fromm R, Gibbs L, McCallum W, et al. Critical care in the emergency department: a time based study. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:970-976.
4. Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, et al. National Estimates of Severe Sepsis in United States Emergency Departments. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35:1928-1936.
5. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303-1310.
6. Opal SM, Cross AS. Clinical trials for severe sepsis: past failures, and future hopes. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1999;13:285-297.
7. Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, et al. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1025-1032.
8. Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, et al. Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 1994;330: 1717-1722.
9. Connors AFJ, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996;276:889-897.
10. Haupt MT. Goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy [letter; comment]. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:799.
11. Hinds C, Watson D. Manipulating hemodynamics and oxygen transport in critically ill patients [letter; comment]. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1074-1075.
12. Shoemaker WC. Goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy [letter; comment]. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:799-800.
13. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: 1368-1377.
14. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283:2008-2012.
15. Van Tulder MW, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28:1290-1299.
16. Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination: does this patient have an abdominal aortic aneurysm" JAMA. 1999;28:77-82.
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
18. Wira CR, Becker J, Martin G, et al. Anti-arrhythmic and vasopressor medications for the treatment of ventricular fibrillation in severe hypothermia: a systematic review of the literature. Resuscitation. 2008; 78:21-29.
19. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, et al. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2, Biostat, Englewood NJ (2005).
20. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, et al. The impact of compliance with 6-h and 24-h sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2005;9:764-770.
21. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Abate NL, et al. Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department. Chest. 2006; 129:225-232.
22. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, et al. Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1025-1032.
23. Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, et al. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2707-2713.
24. Jones AE, Focht A, Horton JM, et al. Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department-based early goaldirected therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 2007;132:425-432.
25. Nguyen HB, Corbett SW, Steele R, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2007;35: 1105-1112.
26. Sebat F, Musthafa AA, Johnson D, et al. Effect of a rapid response system for patients in shock on time to treatment and mortality during 5 years. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2568-2575.
27. El Sohl AA, Morohunfolu EA, Leith NA, et al. Outcome of septic shock in older adults after implementation of the sepsis bundle. J AmGeriatr Soc. 2008;56:272-278.
28. Puskarich MA, Marchick MR, Kline JA, et al. One year mortality of patients treated with an emergency department based early goal directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock: a before and after study. Critical Care. 2009;13:e167.
29. Crowe CA, Mistry CD, Rzechula K, et al. Evaluation of a modified early goal-directed therapy protocol. Amer J of Emerg Med. 2010;28:689-693.
30. MacRedmond R, Hollohan K, Stenstrom R, et al. Introduction of a comprehensive management protocol for severe sepsis is associated with sustained improvements in timeliness of care and survival. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e46.
31. Patel GW, Roderman N, Gehring H, et al. Assessing the Effect of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Treatment Guidelines on Clinical Outcomes in a Community Hospital. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1733-1738.
32. Coba V, Whitmill M, Mooney R, et al. Resuscitation Bundle Compliance in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock : Improves Survival, Is Better Late than never. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26:e304.
33. Sivayoham N, Rhodes A, Jaiganesh T, et al. Outcomes from implementing early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock: a 4-year observational cohort study. Eur J Emerg Med 2011;00: 000-000.
34. Tanios MA, Zabow M, Epstein SK. The impact of implementing severe sepsis management guidelines on mortality in a community basedteaching hospital. Chest. 2007;132:494a.
35. Gaieski D, McCoy J, Zeserson E, et al. Mortality benefit after implementation of early goal directed therapy protocol for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(3 Suppl 1): 4.
36. Armstrong R, Salfen SJ. Results of implementing a rapid response team approach in treatment of shock in a community hospital. In: 43rd Annual Meeting Abstract Book. Infectious Disease Society of America 2005, p. 154.
37. Ikeda D, Hayatdavoudi S, Winchell J, et al. The impact of using a standard protocol for the surviving sepsis 6 and 24 h bundles in septic patients on total ICU risk adjusted mortality. Crit Care Med. 2006;34: A108.
38. Kinsella MT, Biltoft JM, Marez H, et al. Improving mortality from severe sepsis by implementation of surviving sepsis guidelines at a community teaching hospital. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:A109.
39. Mullon J, Subramanian S, Haro L, et al. Sepsis order set improves adherence to evidence-based practices. Scientific highlights: Abstracts of Original Investigations and Case Reports. Chest. 2006;130S:134S- 135S.
40. Stenstrom RJ, Hollohan K, Nebre R, et al. Impact of a sepsis protocol for the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. JCMU. 2006;8:S16.
41. Antro C, Merico F, Scalabrino E, et al. Implementation of the survival sepsis campaign for severe sepsis and septic shock in the ED. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(S):S67.
42. Cannon, CM. Improving outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: results of a prospective multicenter collaborative. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:A164.
43. Gunaga, S, Kella V, Walker J, et al. Implementation of a sepsis quality initiative in a community hospital and its impact on morbidity and mortality in septic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:S55.
44. Sebat F, Johnson D, Musthafa AA, et al. A multidisciplinary community hospital program for early and rapid resuscitation of shock in nontrauma patients. Chest. 2005;127:1729-1743.
45. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Intens Care Med. 2004;30:536-555.
46. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. Intens Care Med. 2004;30:536-555.
47. Jones A, Shapiro N, Roshon M. Implementing Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Emergency Setting: The challenges and experiences of translating research innovations into clinical reality in academic and community settings. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:1072-1078.