Where are the global rankings leading us? An analysis of recent methodological changes and new developments

European Journal of Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 29-44

  Rauhvargers, Andrejs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA   (Latvia)

Author keywords

Indicators; Methodology changes; Rankings' impact; Reputation survey; University rankings; University responses

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896704353     PISSN: 01418211     EISSN: 14653435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12066     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L. & Fernández, M. (2008) Webometric ranking of world universities: introduction, methodology, and future developments, Higher Education in Europe, 33, pp. 234-244.
2. Baty, P. (2012a) Rankings without reason, Inside Higher Education, 31 May. www.insidehighered.com/views/2012/05/31/essay-danger-countries-setting-policy-based-university-rankings
3. Baty, P. (2012b) Rankings don't tell the whole story - Handle them with care, University World News Global Edition, Issue 227, 26 June. www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20120626171938451
4. Baty, P. (2012c) The essential elements in our world-leading formula, Times Higher Education, 4 October. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/world-ranking/methodology
5. Chan, S. (2012) Enhancing Global Competitiveness: University Ranking Movement in Asia, The Academic Rankings and Advancement of Higher Education: Lessons from Asia and Other Regions. Proceedings, IREG-6 Conference (Taipei, Taiwan, 19-20 April), Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, pp. 125-142.
6. Espeland, W. N. & Saunder, M. (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds, American Journal of Sociology, 113, pp. 1-40.
7. Forslöw, B. (2012), Rankings and competitive metrics from a university perspective. Presentation, NUAS Conference (Stockholm, Sweden, August 12-14, 2012) www.webforum.com/nuasconference/getfile.ashx?cid=331413&cc=3&refid=149
8. Hazelkorn, E. (2011) Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. The Battle for World-Class Excellence (New York, Palgrave Macmillan)
9. Hwung, H. H. & Huey-Jen Su, J. (2012) How NCKU uses ranking as a benchmarking tool to promote its internal quality and international visibility: a case study, The Academic Rankings and Advancement of Higher Education: Lessons from Asia and Other Regions. Proceedings, IREG-6 Conference (Taipei, Taiwan, 19-20 April), Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, pp. 301-308.
10. IHEP (2009) Impact of College Rankings on Institutional Decision Making: Four Country Case Studies. (Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP)). www.ihep.org/publications/publications-detail.cfm?id=126
11. IBNLive (2012) UGC to allow only top 500 foreign universities to enter India, IBN Live. http://content.ibnlive.in.com/article/03-Jun-2012india/ugc-to-allow-only-top-500-foreign-univs-in-india-263954-3.html
12. Jaschik, S. (2007) The Mobile International Student, Inside Higher Ed, 10 October.
13. Milot, B. (2012) University rankings and system benchmarking reach similar results, University World News, Issue No. 238, 9 September. http://test.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2012090414311572
14. Miyairi, N. & Chang, H-W. (2012) Methods and Examples of Applying Data to Different Levels' Research Excellence, Proceedings, 2012 HEEACT pre-conference workshop 'Using data in research excellence and institutional strategic plan', pp. 86-95
15. Morphew, C. C. & Swanson, C. (2011) On the efficacy of raising your university's rankings, in: J. Shin, R. Toutkoushian & U. Teichler (Eds) University Rankings: theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education, pp. 185-199 (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York; Springer).
16. Netherlands Immigration and Naturalisation Office (2012) A highly educated migrant seeking employment. Netherlands Immigration and Naturalisation Office, pp. 1.
17. Olds, K. (2012) The Business Side of World University Rankings. globalhighered.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/the-business-side-of-world-university-rankings/
18. Olds, K. & Robertson, S. L. (2012) Towards a global common data set for world university rankers, Global Higher Ed Wordpress, 4 June.
19. O'Leary, J. (2012) QS Best student cities: responding to global demand, Topuniversities. www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/qs-best-student-cities/qs-best-student-cities-responding-global-demand
20. Proulx, R. (2012) Using World University Ranking Systems to Inform and Guide Strategic Policy and Decision Making How to Benchmark Rather Than Rank Performance with Application to Canadian Research Universities. The Academic Rankings and Advancement of Higher Education: Lessons from Asia and Other Regions, Proceedings, IREG-6 Conference (Taipei, Taiwan, 19-20 April), Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, pp. 187-209.
21. QS (2011a) How do we classify institutions? www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/qs-classifications/
22. QS (2011b) QS Stars Rating System: shining a light on excellence, recognizing diversity in higher education. http://qsiu.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/qs-stars_fall_11_foremail1.pdf
23. QS (2011c) World University Rankings. Subject Tables Methodology. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Education/documents/2011/09/02/METHODOLOGY2011.pdf
24. QS (2011d), QS World University Rankings. Subject tables methodology, version 3. http://content.qs.com/wur/qs-world-university-rankings-by-subject-methodology.pdf
25. QS (2012a) QS University Rankings: Top 50 Under 50. www.topuniversities.com/top-50-under-50
26. QS (2012b) QS Stars ratings system Shining a Light on Excellence. Recognizing Diversity in Higher Education. www.iu.qs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/QS-Stars-Brochure_2012.pdf
27. QS (2012c) QS World University Rankings by Subject. www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/
28. QS (2012d) What Makes a Top Student City? www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings-articles/qs-best-student-cities/what-makes-top-student-city
29. QS (2013) QS World University Rankings by Subject 2013 www.topuniversities.com/subject-rankings
30. Rauhvargers, A. (2011) Global University Rankings and their Impact (Brussels, European University Association) www.eua.be/pubs/Global_University_Rankings_and_Their_Impact.pdf
31. Rauhvargers, A. (2013) Global University Rankings and their Impact (Brussels, European University Association). www.eua.be/pubs/Global_University_Rankings_and_Their_Impact.pdf
32. SRC ARWU (2012a) Macedonian HEIs Ranking. www.shanghairanking.com/Macedonian_HEIs_Ranking/index.html
33. SRC ARWU (2012b) Greater China University Ranking Methodology. www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater-China-ranking-Methodology-2011.html
34. THE (2013a) Times Higher Education 100 Under 50. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013/one-hundred-under-fifty
35. THE (2013b) Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings. www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013/reputation-ranking/range/01-50
36. Thomson Reuters (2010) Global opinion survey. New outlooks on institutional profiles. ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/Global_Opinion_Survey.pdf
37. Thomson Reuters (2012a) Global Institutional Profiles Project. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/globalprofilesproject/
38. Thomson Reuters (2012b) Institutional Profiles Indicator group descriptions. http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/researchanalytics/m/pdfs/ip_indicator_groups.pdf
39. Thomson Reuters (2012c) Global Institutional Profiles Project, Institutional Data Collection. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/globalprofilesproject/gpp-datacollection/
40. van Raan, T., van Leeuwen, T. & Visser, M. (2011) Non-English papers decrease rankings, Nature, 469, p. 34.
41. van Raan, T., van Leeuwen, T. & Visser, M. (2010) Germany and France are wronged in citation-based ranking. www.cwts.nl/pdf/LanguageRanking22122010.pdf
42. van Vught, F. & Ziegele, F. (Eds.) (2012) Multi-dimensional ranking: the design and development of U-Multiran (Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York, Springer).
43. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, N. C., Tijssen, R. J. & Wouters, P. (2012) The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1202/1202.3941.pdf
44. WEBOMETRICS (2013) Methodology. www.webometrics.info/en/Methodology
45. Williams, R., Rassenfosse, G., Jensen, P. & Marginson, S. (2012) U21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems. www.universitas21.com/RelatedFile/Download/279
46. Williams, R., Rassenfosse, G., Jensen, P. & Marginson, S. (2013) U21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems. www.universitas21.com/article/projects/details/152/u21-ranking-of-national-higher-education-systems
47. Yonezawa, A. (2012) Rankings and Information on Japanese Universities. Proceedings, IREG-6 Conference (Taipei, Taiwan, 19-20 April) (Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, pp. 149-163).